Hearts of diabetic individuals are susceptible to ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury. The RNA-binding protein Quaking (QKI) is known to link intracellular signaling to cellular survival and QKI dysregulation may contribute to human diseases. However, the function of QKI in diabetic hearts remains unknown. The current study attempted to identify new molecular mechanisms that potentially contribute to the susceptibility to ischemic injury in diabetic myocardium. Diabetic ob/ob mice or wild-type C57BL/6J mice were subjected to in vivo myocardial I/R. Myocardial infarct size and apoptosis, QKI5 and FoxO1 expression, nitrosative stress (NS) and ER stress were compared. Knockdown of FoxO1 was obtained by intramyocardial injection of FoxO1 specific small interfering RNA (siRNA, 20μg), and upregulation of QKI5 was acquired by injecting adenovirus encoding-QKI5. Obvious NS stress was observed in the myocardium of ob/ob mice represented by elevated iNOS expression, total NO content and nitrotyrosine content. Administration of 1400W or M40401 partly reduced the caspase-3 activity in ob/ob myocardium encountering I/R (P<0.05). Higher ER stress was also observed represented by increased p-PERK, p-eIF2α and expression of CHOP in ob/ob myocardium. ER stress inhibitor did not affect the excessive NS stress, but partially reduced I/R-induced caspase-3 activity in ob/ob hearts (P<0.05). FoxO1 was overactivated in ob/ob myocardium, and knockdown of FoxO1 attenuated both levels of NS stress and ER stress (P<0.05). Furthermore, QKI5 expression was deficient in ob/ob myocardium. Upregulation of QKI5 diminished FoxO1 expression together with NS and ER stress in ob/ob myocardium, further reducing MI/R injury. Finally, QKI5 overexpression destabilized FoxO1 mRNA in cardiomyocytes. These results suggested that QKI5 deficiency contributed to the overactivation of FoxO1 in ob/ob animals and subsequently magnified nitrosative stress and ER stress, which enhances the ischemic intolerance of diabetic hearts.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is an increasingly prevalent arrhythmia with significant health and socioeconomic impact. The underlying mechanism of AF is still not well understood. In this study, we sought to identify hub genes involved in AF, and explored their functions and underlying mechanisms based on bioinformatics analysis. Five microarray datasets in GEO were used to identify the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) by Robust Rank Aggregation (RRA), and hub genes were screened out using protein–protein interaction (PPI) network. AF model was established using a mixture of acetylcholine and calcium chloride (Ach-CaCl2) by tail vein injection. We totally got 35 robust DEGs that mainly involve in extracellular matrix formation, leukocyte transendothelial migration, and chemokine signaling pathway. Among these DEGs, we identified three hub genes involved in AF, of which CXCL12/CXCR4 axis significantly upregulated in AF patients stands out as one of the most potent targets for AF prevention, and its effect on AF pathogenesis and underlying mechanisms were investigated in vivo subsequently with the specific CXCR4 antagonist AMD3100 (6 mg/kg). Our results demonstrated an elevated transcription and translation of CXCL12/CXCR4 axis in AF patients and mice, accompanied with the anabatic atrial inflammation and fibrosis, thereby providing the substrate for AF maintenance. Blocking its signaling via AMD3100 administration in AF model mice reduced AF inducibility and duration, partly ascribed to decreased atrial inflammation and structural remodeling. Mechanistically, these effects were achieved by reducing the recruitment of CD3+ T lymphocytes and F4/80+ macrophages, and suppressing the hyperactivation of ERK1/2 and AKT/mTOR signaling in atria of AF model mice. In conclusion, this study provides new evidence that antagonizing CXCR4 prevents the development of AF, and suggests that CXCL12/CXCR4 axis may be a potential therapeutic target for AF.

Neuropeptide FF (NPFF) belongs to an opioid-modulating peptide family. NPFF has been reported to play important roles in the control of pain and analgesia through interactions with the opioid system. However, very few studies examined the effect of supraspinal NPFF system on analgesia induced by opiates administered at the peripheral level. In the present study, intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) injection of NPFF (1, 3 and 10 nmol) dose-dependently inhibited systemic morphine (0.12 mg, i.p.) analgesia in the mouse tail flick test. Similarly, i.c.v. administration of dNPA and NPVF, two agonists highly selective for NPFF(2) and NPFF(1) receptors, respectively, decreased analgesia induced by i.p. morphine in mice. Furthermore, these anti-opioid activities of NPFF and related peptides were blocked by pretreatment with the NPFF receptors selective antagonist RF9 (10 nmol, i.c.v.). These results demonstrate that activation of central NPFF(1) and NPFF(2) receptors has the similar anti-opioid actions on the antinociceptive effect of systemic morphine.

No abstract