ObjectiveThe ERK/MAPK signaling pathway regulates cell proliferation and invasion. MAPK kinase 1 (MEK1) is a protein kinase upstream of ERK that can activate the pathway. Expression of microRNA (miR)-16 in lung cancer tissues is decreased. The aim of this study was to determine roles of miR-16 in proliferation and invasion of lung cancer cells.MethodsWe used a luciferase reporter assay to determine a regulatory relationship between miR-16 and MEK1 and assessed expression of MEK1 in normal lung cells and lung cancer cell lines. Plate cloning, flow cytometry, and Transwell experiments demonstrated the proliferation and invasion ability of cells transfected with wild-type and mutant MEK1.ResultsWe confirmed a regulatory relationship between miR-16 and MEK1 mRNA. Expression of miR-16 was decreased and that of MEK1 and p-ERK1/2 were increased in lung cancer cell lines compared with normal cells. Transfection with miR-101 mimic or small interfering (si)-MEK1 significantly downregulated expression of MEK1 and p-ERK1/2 in Anip973 cells.ConclusionsDecreased miR-16 expression may play a role in upregulating expression of MEK1 and promoting proliferation and invasion of lung cancer cells. Overexpression of miR-16 downregulated the ERK/MAPK pathway by inhibiting MEK1 expression, attenuating clone formation and invasion, and inhibiting cell proliferation.

Magnetic resonance-guided microwave ablation (MRI-guided MWA) is a new, minimally invasive ablation method for cancer. This study sought to analyze the clinical value of MRI-guided MWA in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We compared the precision, efficiency, and clinical efficacy of treatment in patients who underwent MRI-guided MWA or computed tomography (CT)-guided microwave ablation (CT-guided MWA). Propensity score matching was used on the prospective cohort (MRI-MWA group, n = 45) and the retrospective observational cohort (CT-MWA group, n = 305). To evaluate the advantages and efficacy of MRI-guided MWA, data including the accuracy of needle placement, scan duration, ablation time, total operation time, length of hospital stay, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were collected and compared between the two groups. The mean number of machine scans required to adjust the needle position was 7.62 ± 1.69 (range 4–12) for the MRI-MWA group and 9.64 ± 2.14 (range 5–16) for the CT-MWA group (p < 0.001). The mean time for antenna placement was comparable between the MRI and CT groups (54.41 ± 12.32 min and 53.03 ± 11.29 min, p = 0.607). The microwave ablation time of the two groups was significantly different (7.62 ± 2.65 min and 9.41 ± 2.86 min, p = 0.017), while the overall procedure time was comparable (91.28 ± 16.69 min vs. 93.41 ± 16.03 min, p = 0.568). The overall complication rate in the MRI-MWA group was significantly lower than in the CT-MWA group (12% vs. 51%, p = 0.185). The median time to progression was longer in the MRI-MWA group than in the CT-MWA group (11 months [95% CI 10.24–11.75] vs. 9 months [95% CI 8.00–9.99], p = 0.0003; hazard ratio 0.3690 [95% CI 0.2159–0.6306]). OS was comparable in both groups (MRI group 26.0 months [95% CI 25.022–26.978] vs. CT group 23.0 months [95% CI 18.646–27.354], p = 0.18). This study provides hitherto-undocumented evidence of the clinical effects of MRI-guided MWA on patients with NSCLC and determines the relative safety and efficiency of MRI- and CT-guided MWA.