Transvaginal removal of ectopic pregnancy tissue is a new surgical approach for the treatment of CSEP. The efficacy and safety of the approach needs further confirmation.
BackgroundSurgical vaginoplasty is the standard treatment for women suffering from Mayer–Rokitansky–Küster–Hauser (MRKH) syndrome. This study compares the advantages and disadvantages of Luohu I technique or its modification, Luohu II technique.MethodsWomen with MRKH syndrome undergoing laparoscopic peritoneal vaginoplasty using either the Luohu I (N = 145) or Luohu II (N = 155) technique were recruited. We compare the effectiveness of the Luohu II and one of Luohu I. Sexual satisfaction was checked by Female Sexual Function Index.ResultsThere was no significant difference in the mean operation time, volume of intraoperative blood loss, time for the first passage of gas, sexual satisfaction (and hospital stay for patients in either group (P > 0.05). But patients in the Luohu II group had a significantly lower incidence of complications than patients in the Luohu I group. All patients had vaginal depths more than 9 cm over 3 months post-surgery.ConclusionsCompared with the traditional Luohu I laparoscopic peritoneal vaginoplasty, the Luohu II operation is easier to perform and causes less damage to the bladder and rectum. The physiological and anatomical features of the artificial vagina resemble the normal vagina in both techniques.
Background: Ovarian pregnancy (OP) is a rare ectopic pregnancy, in which it is very difficult to achieve preoperative diagnosis. Ovarian blood supply in OP increases which will lead to intra-abdominal bleeding, hazarding women's lives. Surgical exploration should be conducted once cases of OP are suspected. Objective: To investigate clinical characteristics, diagnosis, and therapy of OP. Materials and Methods: A retrospective study was conducted in 95 patients with OP admitted to the present hospital from January 2005 to June 2014. Results: OP accounted for 1.79% of ectopic pregnancy over the same period, of which 68.4% had a history of artificial abortion, 6.3% was treated with intrauterine contraceptive device (IUD), 87.4% had abdominal pain, 84.2% had a history of menopause, and 51.6% had vaginal bleeding. All patients had no preoperative diagnosis and underwent laparoscopic wedge resection of ovary or lesionectomy and were all were cured. Conclusion: Since the cause of OP is still unknown and it has no typical clinical manifestations, the present authors adopt blood β-hCG combined with B-ultrasound to improve the preoperative diagnosis. They prefer laparoscopic wedge resection of ovary or lesionectomy, which induce higher rate of intrauterine pregnancy and lower rates of ectopic pregnancy and infertility in re-pregnancy after surgery.
Objective: To explore the causes of rectal injuries during laparoscopic peritoneal vaginoplasty (Luohu operation) and assess measures that can be taken to increase safety of the operation. Materials and Methods: Data of patients with rectal injuries that occurred during Luohu vaginoplasty were analyzed retrospectively. Results: Three hundred and six patients received Luohu vaginoplasty. Rectal injuries occurred in 13 patients (4.2%). All patients recovered after intraoperative repair or postoperative rectovaginal fistula repair, performed within three to six months. Full display of the anatomical structures at the bottom of the pelvic cavity and successful construction of the vaginal tunnel are the two most important requirements for reducing the risk of rectal injury in laparoscopic vaginoplasty. In repair of fistulae postoperatively, it is important that resection of tissues or scars around the fistulae be avoided in order to reduce the chance of a injuries caused by diverting colostomy or colostomy closure. Conclusion: Laparoscopic vaginoplasty is a generally safe procedure, but rectal injury can occur. Retaining the tissues or scars around the rectovaginal fistula can be successfully repaired, either when they are recognized during the operation or within a few months postoperatively.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.