Introduction Intestinal malrotation is a rare congenital abnormality occurring in 0.2–1% of the population. Adult presentations comprise only 0.2–0.5% of all cases leading to diagnostic challenges and worse outcomes in adults. We present a rare case of chronic/intermittent midgut volvulus with unique anatomic findings in an adult with intestinal malrotation. Presentation of case An 18-year-old Caucasian male presented to a community hospital with abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting. He underwent a CT scan demonstrating concern for small bowel volvulus and subsequently underwent a negative exploratory laparotomy. He was discharged post-operatively with no identified etiology for his presentation. He subsequently had multiple presentations to the ED with recurrent symptoms, review of imaging led to concern for duodenal volvulus resulting in transfer to a tertiary hepatobiliary centre. Repeat CT scan two weeks following initial presentation was consistent with intestinal malrotation with midgut volvulus. Bloodwork was unremarkable and physical exam demonstrated normal vital signs with a tender epigastrium. He underwent an exploratory laparotomy with Ladd's procedure. Intra-operative findings included a midgut volvulus and uniquely positioned Ladd's bands to the transverse colon. Post-operatively he tolerated oral intake and was discharged with three-month follow-up. Discussion Adults with intestinal malrotation suffer from delays in diagnosis and management. In contrast to the neonatal population, adults often present with vague, or chronic symptoms, which obscures the diagnosis. Conclusion The increased morbidity and mortality observed in adults with intestinal malrotation highlights the need for surgeons to appreciate the challenges associated with this diagnosis in the adult population to ensure early recognition and management.
Choosing a surgical specialty can be a hard decision for a medical student. Several studies present data showing that most medical students fear the surgical field and end up switching to another specialty. For cardiovascular surgery, the scenario is very similar. In the last decades, the interest in cardiovascular surgery has been decreasing worldwide and the cardiothoracic surgical societies across the globe have been trying to understand the factors that push away medical students and general surgical residents from the specialty. In this regard, our work aims to focus on describe the access of students to cardiovascular surgery, especially during medical school, as well as to provide a brief report of our current data regarding the specialty.
Objective To investigate whether hybrid repair has supremacy over conventional open repair in aortic arch diseases. Methods A comprehensive search was undertaken in two major databases (PubMed and MEDLINE) to identify all studies comparing the two surgical techniques in five years, up to December 2018, that met the established criteria in this study. The search returned 310 papers, and 305 were selected after removing duplicates. The abstracts of the remaining articles were assessed, resulting in 15 studies that went to full-text analysis. After application of the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 8 papers remained for the final revision. Results Eight studies met the criteria, with the inclusion of 1,837 patients. From a short-term perspective, hybrid repair and conventional open repair had similar outcomes in terms of postoperative mortality and acute neurological events. Hybrid repair was associated with less respiratory complications and risk of new intervention, as well as reduced hospital length of stay. Conventional open repair showed better mid- and long-term outcomes. Conclusion Hybrid repair should be used in selected patients, with a high risk or very high-risk profile for conventional surgery. Finally, since most of the current data were obtained from limited to large samples, with narrow follow-up and had great heterogeneity, the best approach to the aortic arch is still variable. Therefore, the decision of the approach should be individualized and evaluated by the whole Heart Team, considering the expertise of the surgical team.
IntroductionPatient-centred care is valued by patients and providers. As management of cancer becomes increasingly complex, the value of providing care that incorporates an individual’s values and preferences along with demographic and tumour factors is increasingly important. To improve care, patients with cancer need easily accessible information on the outcomes important to them. The patient-centred outcome, days at home (DAH), is based on a construct that measures the time a patient spends alive and out of hospitals and healthcare institutions. DAH is accurately measured from various data sources and has shown construct validity with many patient-centred outcomes. There is significant heterogeneity in terms used and definitions for DAH in cancer care. This scoping review aims to consolidate information on the outcome DAH in cancer care and to review definitions and terms used to date to guide future use of DAH as a patient-centred care, research and policy tool.Methods and analysisThis scoping review protocol has been designed with joint guidance from theJBI Manual for Evidence Synthesisand the expanded framework from Arksey and O’Malley. We will systematically search MEDLINE, Embase and Scopus for studies measuring DAH, or equivalent, in the context of active adult cancer care. Broad inclusion criteria have been developed, given the recent introduction of DAH into cancer literature. Editorials, opinion pieces, case reports, abstracts, dissertations, protocols, reviews, narrative studies and grey literature will be excluded. Two authors will independently perform full-text selection. Data will be extracted, charted and summarised both qualitatively and quantitively.Ethics and disseminationNo ethics approval is required for this scoping review. Results will be disseminated through scientific publication and presentation at relevant conferences.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
334 Leonard St
Brooklyn, NY 11211
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.