Studies on the impact of work-family dynamics on both parenting and children’s outcomes are scarce. The present study addressed this gap by exploring how parents’ negative (conflicting) and positive (enriching) experiencing of work and family roles related to children’s internalizing and externalizing problem behaviors through its association with the quality of parent–child relationships. A sample of 317 dual-earner couples with preschool children was used to conduct a dyadic analysis of both within- and cross-dyad influences of parents’ work-family experiences on child problem behaviors. Our results indicated that the way parents balance work and family is associated with their parent–child relationships, which in turn is differentially linked with their children’s behaviors. We found that mothers’ work-family conflict (WFC) contributed to children’s externalization difficulties through its detrimental associations with their own and with their partners’ parent–child relationship quality. By contrast, mothers’ work-family enrichment (WFE) was negatively linked to children’s externalization difficulties through its positive link with the mother–child relationship. Fathers’ experience of WFC was associated with both children’s internalization and externalization difficulties through its negative association with their own father–child relationship quality. In addition, fathers’ experience of WFE also linked to children’s externalization difficulties, but only indirectly, via its positive association with the quality of their relationship with the child. Further implications of these findings for advancing understanding of the impact of work-family dynamics on intrafamily relationships, as well as for individual and organizational interventions, are discussed.
Work-family balance and child rearing are major social concerns. Few studies, however, have addressed how parents' work-family conflict (WFC) associates with children's emotion regulation. This study proposes the link to occur through parents' psychological availability (PA). In our model we tested both intraindividual and interindividual effects on a sample of 138 dual-earner couples with preschool-aged children. Our results showed that WFC related negatively to PA (actor and partner effects); fathers' and mothers' PA associated negatively with child lability and positively with child emotion regulation. Indirect effects were found for fathers' and mothers' WFC and children's emotion regulation and lability through partners' PA, controlling for child gender and temperament. These findings showed a dyadic pattern among couples' work-family balance, parenting, and children's emotion regulation.European societies have undergone profound changes in family life over the past few decades, and as a consequence, families are developing different ways of dealing with parenthood, child rearing, and work-family balance. Recent data reveal that 51% of
& Matos, P. M. (2016). Preschool children's prosocial behavior: The role of mother-child, fatherchild and teacher-child relationships. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 25(6) Prosocial behavior is considered an important dimension of positive development. Although previous research suggests the quality of children's early relationships may influence prosocial behaviors, the specific contributions of mother, father and teacher to children's prosocial behavior have been less examined. This is a cross-sectional study that investigates (a) the combined associations between mother-, father-and teacher-child relationships, and prosocial behavior in 168 children aged 36 to 72 months, and (b) the mediating role of the teacher-child relationship in the association between the parent-child relationship and prosocial behavior. Results suggested a positive link between the quality of relationships with early caregivers and children's prosocial behavior. The quality of both father-and teacherchild relationships were found to have a direct association with children's prosocial behavior.The quality of the mother-child relationship was indirectly linked to children's prosocial behavior, via the teacher-child relationship. Results suggesting connections between multiple relational contexts were discussed based on the notion of internal working models proposed by attachment theory. Mothers' and fathers' contributions to children's prosocial behavior were also discussed considering differences on relational styles and changing roles of mothers and fathers from dual-earner families.
Workplace family support has been regarded as a factor that helps reduce individuals' work to family conflict (WFC). How this support translates into families' functioning is still to be determined. In this study, we used a systems perspective to examine (a) how perceptions of workplace family support affect parental satisfaction and consequently reduce WFC and (b) how the perception of support affects partners' parental satisfaction and WFC in dual‐earner couples. A two‐wave dyadic data set of dual‐earner couples with preschool‐aged children (N = 90) was used, and the actor‐partner interdependence mediation model (APIMeM) was applied. Results showed that controlling for WFC, working hours, number and age of children, mothers' perceptions of workplace family support (time 1) had indirect effects, through mothers' parental satisfaction (time 1), on their own levels of WFC (time 2) as well as on their partners' levels of WFC (time 2). Fathers' perceptions of workplace family support (time 1) had a direct effect on fathers' parental satisfaction (time 1) and on fathers' WFC (time 2). These results suggest that in addition to boosting parental well‐being, perceptions of a supportive workplace may help reduce the level of WFC for both direct recipients of support and their partners, in particular when support is experienced by mothers, and when these mothers experience heightened parental satisfaction.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.