This article aims to demonstrate the unconstitutionality of the rule contained in the second part of art. 492, I, “e”, of Law No. 13.964/2019, in which the provisional execution of the sentence is signed after the conviction in the Jury Court for sentences equal to or greater than 15 (fi fteen) years of imprisonment. The problem revolves around the violation of fundamental rights and guarantees established in the Magna Carta and the international treaties to which Brazil is a signatory, as well as the legal uncertainty promoted by the change in the understanding on the subject by the Supreme Court. The research was developed in an exploratory mode, with a bibliographic and jurisprudential survey. In the end, we seek to verify what measures can be adopted to solve the problem of unconstitutionality in the norm in question.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.