No abstract

A high affinity, tridentate metal ion site has been constructed previously by His substitutions in an antagonist binding site located between transmembrane segment (TM)‐V and TM‐VI in the substance P NK‐1 receptor. Here, an attempt is made to probe helix‐helix interactions systematically in the NK‐1 receptor by engineering of bis‐His Zn(II) sites. His residues were introduced at selected positions individually and in combinations in the exterior segments of TM‐II, III and V in both the wild‐type background and after Ala substitution of naturally occurring His residues, and the increase in the affinity for Zn(II) was monitored in competition binding experiments with iodinated substance P or a tritiated non‐peptide antagonist. In this way, two high affinity bis‐His sites were constructed between position 193 in TM‐V (Glu193, G1uV:01) and position 109 in TM‐III (Asn1O9, AsnIII:05) as well as between the neighboring, naturally occurring His108 in TM‐III (HisIII:04) and position 92 in TM‐II (Tyr92, TyrII:24), respectively. Functionally, the coordination of zinc ions at these two sites blocked the receptor as it antagonized the substance P‐induced increase in phosphatidylinositol turnover. It is concluded that the bis‐His zinc sites from the central TM‐III helix to TM‐II and ‐V, respectively, together with the interconnected, previously constructed tridentate site between TM‐V and ‐VI, constitute a basic network of distance constraints for the molecular models of receptors with seven transmembrane segments which, for example, strongly support an anti‐clockwise orientation of the seven helical bundle as viewed from the extracellular space.

Partly due to lack of detailed knowledge of the molecular recognition of ligands the structural basis for partial versus full agonism is not known. In the beta(2)-adrenergic receptor the agonist binding site has previously been structurally and functionally exchanged with an activating metal-ion site located between AspIII:08-or a His residue introduced at this position in transmembrane domain (TM)-III-and a Cys residue substituted for AsnVII:06 in TM-VII. Here, this interhelical, bidentate metal-ion site is without loss of Zn(2+) affinity transferred to the tachykinin NK(1) receptor. In contrast to the similarly mutated beta(2)-adrenergic receptor, signal transduction-i.e., inositol phosphate turnover-could be stimulated by both Zn(2+) and by the natural agonist, Substance P in the mutated NK(1) receptor. The metal-ion acted as a 25% partial agonist through binding to the bidentate zinc switch located exactly one helical turn below the two previously identified interaction points for Substance P in, respectively, TM-III and -VII. The metal-ion chelator, phenantroline, which in the beta(2)-adrenergic receptor increased both the potency and the agonistic efficacy of Zn(2+) or Cu(2+) in complex with the chelator, also bound to the metal-ion site-engineered NK(1) receptor, but here the metal-ion chelator complex instead acted as a pure antagonist. It is concluded that signaling of even distantly related rhodopsin-like 7TM receptors can be activated through Zn(2+) coordination between metal-ion binding residues located at positions III:08 and VII:06. It is suggested that only partial agonism is obtained through this simple well defined metal-ion coordination due to lack of proper interactions with residues also in TM-VI.

Two nonpeptide ligands that differ chemically by only a single methyl group but have agonistic (L-162,782) and antagonistic (L-162,389) properties in vivo were characterized on the cloned angiotensin AT1 receptor. Both compounds bound with high affinity (K(I) = 8 and 28 nM, respectively) to the AT1 receptor expressed transiently in COS-7 cells as determined in radioligand competition assays. L-162,782 acted as a powerful partial agonist, stimulating phosphatidylinositol turnover with a bell-shaped dose-response curve to 64% of the maximal level reached in response to angiotensin II. Surprisingly, L-162,389 also stimulated phosphatidylinositol turnover, albeit only to a small percentage of the angiotensin response. The prototype nonpeptide AT1 agonist L-162,313 gave a response of approximately 50%. The apparent EC50 values for all three compounds in stimulating phosphatidylinositol turnover were similar, approximately 30 nM, corresponding to their binding affinity. Each of the three compounds also acted as angiotensin antagonists, yet in this capacity the compounds differed markedly, with IC50 values ranging from 1.05 x 10(-7) M for L-162,389 to 6.5 x 10(-6) for L-162,782. A series of point mutations in the transmembrane segments (TMs) of the AT1 receptor had only minor effect on the binding affinity of the nonpeptide compounds, with the exception of A104V at the top of TM III, which selectively impaired the binding of L-162,782 and L-162,389. Substitutions in the middle of TM III, VI, or VII, which did not affect the binding affinity of the compounds, impaired or eliminated the agonistic efficacy of the nonpeptides but with only minor or no effect on the angiotensin potency or efficacy. Thus, in the N295D rat AT1 construct, L-162,782, L-162,313, and L-162,389 all antagonized the angiotensin-induced phosphatidylinositol turnover with surprisingly similar IC50 values (90-180 nM), and they all bound with unaltered, high affinity (22-36 nM). However, L-162,313 and L-162,782 could stimulate phosphatidylinositol turnover to only 20% of that of angiotensin. It is concluded that minor chemical modifications of either the compound or the receptor can dramatically alter the agonistic efficacy of biphenyl imidazole compounds on the AT1 receptor without affecting their affinity, as determined in binding assays, and that a number of substitutions in the middle of the TM segments affect the efficacy of nonpeptide agonists as opposed to angiotensin.