Erk/MAPK and TGFbeta signaling cause epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) and metastasis in mouse mammary epithelial cells (EpH4) transformed with oncogenic Ras (EpRas). In trials to unravel underlying mechanisms, expression profiling for EMT-specific genes identified a secreted interleukin-related protein (ILEI), upregulated exclusively at the translational level. Stable overexpression of ILEI in EpH4 and EpRas cells caused EMT, tumor growth, and metastasis, independent of TGFbeta-R signaling and enhanced by Bcl2. RNAi-mediated knockdown of ILEI in EpRas cells before and after EMT (EpRasXT) prevented and reverted TGFbeta-dependent EMT, also abrogating metastasis formation. ILEI is overexpressed and/or altered in intracellular localization in multiple human tumors, an event strongly correlated to invasion/EMT, metastasis formation, and survival in human colon and breast cancer.

Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), a switch of polarized epithelial cells to a migratory, fibroblastoid phenotype, is increasingly considered as an important event during malignant tumor progression and metastasis. To identify molecular players involved in EMT and metastasis, we performed expression profiling of a set of combined in vitro/in vivo cellular models, based on clonal, fully polarized mammary epithelial cells. Seven closely related cell pairs were used, which were modified by defined oncogenes and/or external factors and showed specific aspects of epithelial plasticity relevant to cell migration, local invasion and metastasis. Since mRNA levels do not necessarily reflect protein levels in cells, we used an improved expression profiling method based on polysome-bound RNA, suitable to analyse global gene expression on Affymetrix chips. A substantial fraction of all regulated genes was found to be exclusively controlled at the translational level. Furthermore, profiling of the above multiple cell pairs allowed one to identify small numbers of genes by cluster analysis, specifically correlating gene expression with EMT, metastasis, scattering and/or oncogene function. A small set of genes specifically regulated during EMT was identified, including key regulators and signaling pathways involved in cell proliferation, epithelial polarity, survival and transdifferentiation to mesenchymal-like cells with invasive behavior.

Polarized hepatocytes expressing hyperactive Ha-Ras adopt an invasive and metastatic phenotype in cooperation with transforming growth factor (TGF)-b. This dramatic increase in malignancy is displayed by an epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT), which mimics the TGFb-mediated progression of human hepatocellular carcinomas. In culture, hepatocellular EMT occurs highly synchronously, facilitating the analysis of molecular events underlying the various stages of this process. Here, we show that in response to TGF-b, phosphorylated Smads rapidly translocated into the nucleus and activated transcription of target genes such as E-cadherin repressors of the Snail superfamily, causing loss of cell adhesion. Within the TGF-b superfamily of cytokines, TGF-b1, -b2 and -b3 were specific for the induction of hepatocellular EMT. Expression profiling of EMT kinetics revealed 78 up-and 235 downregulated genes, which preferentially modulate metabolic activities, extracellular matrix composition, transcriptional activities and cell survival. Independent of the genetic background, platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF)-A ligand and both PDGF receptor subunits were highly elevated, together with autocrine secretion of bioactive PDGF. Interference with PDGF signalling by employing hepatocytes expressing the dominant-negative PDGF-a receptor revealed decreased TGF-b-induced migration in vitro and efficient suppression of tumour growth in vivo. In conclusion, these results provide evidence for a crucial role of PDGF in TGF-bmediated tumour progression of hepatocytes and suggest PDGF as a target for therapeutic intervention in liver cancer.

Host cell proteins (HCPs) are process-related impurities that may copurify with biopharmaceutical drug products. Within this class of impurities there are some that are more problematic. These problematic HCPs can be considered high-risk and can include those that are immunogenic, biologically active, or enzymatically active with the potential to degrade either product molecules or excipients used in formulation. Some have been shown to be difficult to remove by purification. Why should the biopharmaceutical industry worry about these high-risk HCPs? What approach could be taken to understand the origin of its copurification and address these *Marisa Jones and Nisha Palackal should be considered joint first authors About Biophorum Development Group (BPDG): Since its inception in 2004, BioPhorum has become a trusted environment in which senior leaders of the biopharmaceutical industry come together to share and discuss openly the emerging trends and challenges facing their industry.BioPhorum currently comprises more than 3800 active participants in seven "phorums" covering cell and gene therapy, drug substance, development, fill-finish, a technology roadmap, information technology, and supply partners. The Host Cell Protein (HCP) Workstream is part of the Development Group (BPDG). This article is a composite view of opinions shared by the whole of the BPDG-HCP Workstream and should not be attributed to the individual positions of the participating companies.

In the 40-year history of biopharmaceuticals, there have been a few cases where the final products contained residual host cell protein (HCP) impurities at levels high enough to be of concern. This article summarizes the industry experience in these cases where HCP impurities have been presented in public forums and/or published. Regulatory guidance on HCP impurities is limited to advising that products be as pure as practical, with no specified numerical limit because the risk associated with HCP exposure often depends on the clinical setting (route of administration, dose, indication, patient population) and the particular impurity. While the overall safety and purity track record of the industry is excellent, these examples illustrate several important lessons learned about the kinds of HCPs that co-purify with products (e.g., product homologs, and HCPs that react with product), and the kinds of clinical consequences of HCP impurities (e.g., direct biological activity, immunogenicity, adjuvant). The literature on industry experience with HCP impurities is scattered, and this review draws in to one reference documented examples where the data have been presented in meetings, patents, product inserts, or press releases, in addition to peer-reviewed journal articles. © 2018 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Biotechnol. Prog., 34:828-837, 2018.