The image quality was good for both 2D perfusion (grade 4 +/- 1) and 3D turbo fast low-angle shot (FLASH) (grade 4 +/- 1, n.s.). Compared with TEE, 2D perfusion, 3D turboFLASH, and the combination of both techniques yielded sensitivities of 47/35/44%, specificities of 50/67/67%, positive predictive values of 73/75/80%, and negative predictive values of 25/27/29%, respectively. The size of the thrombus was overestimated by 2D perfusion (66%) and by 3D turboFLASH (25%) and agreement for location and shape of thrombus was 50% and 75% for 2D perfusion and 75% and 50% for 3D turboFLASH, respectively. The TEE thrombus size was significantly larger in patients with true-positive diagnoses by 2D perfusion (148%) and by 3D turboFLASH (151%) when compared with patients with false-negative diagnoses (p < 0.05 for both). No such difference was found for image quality, time delay between TEE and MRI examination, and location and shape of thrombi. Contrast-enhanced MRI lacks diagnostic accuracy for the detection of thrombi in the left atrial appendage. Future technical improvements are essential to establish this technique as a noninvasive alternative to TEE.

This pilot study shows that MRI is a new noninvasive method to detect patent foramen ovale and atrial septal aneurysm. A grading is possible but warrants further investigation regarding its predictive value and impact on treatment strategies.

No abstract

Time-resolved contrast-enhanced MR angiography provides, in one breath-hold, anatomic and qualitative functional information in adult patients with congenital heart disease. The high diagnostic accuracy allows the investigator to tailor subsequent specific MR sequences within the same session.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical relevance of coronary artery calcifications detected by spiral CT, congruence with fluoroscopy (FS) and coronary angiography, and comparison with studies reporting on application of double-helical CT and ultrafast CT. Forty patients underwent spiral CT (2-mm slice thickness, table feed 3 mm/s), coronary angiography, and FS (performed in the usual manner). Stenosis and calcifications were evaluated semiquantitatively. Nineteen patients suffering from a stenosis >/= 75 % were verified at coronary angiography. All had coronary artery calcification on spiral CT. Fluoroscopy did not detect 8 of 19 patients with a stenosis >/= 75 % (1 vessel: n = 1; 2 vessels: n = 3; 3 vessels: n = 4). In spiral CT sensitivity was 100 % and specificity was 33 % (FS: 58 and 48 %). Positive predictive value was 83 % for spiral CT (FS: 50 %), and negative predictive value was 100 % (FS: 56 %). A significant linear increase in the calcification score was found for increasing maximal stenosis (p < 0.005). Spiral CT is more sensitive than FS in the recognition of hemodynamic relevant stenoses using the detection of coronary artery calcifications. Statistical parameters are comparable to ultrafast-CT. Spiral CT is a suitable non-invasive diagnostic technique in coronary heart disease. Coronary calcifications found incidentally in symptomatic patients at chest CT should be reported to the referring physician for further cardiological workup.