Objectives
While the Affordable Care Act improves access to lactation services for many women across the US, low-income mothers in states without Medicaid expansion lack coverage for lactation support. As these states consider individual Medicaid reimbursement policies, the availability, effectiveness, and cost-benefit of lactation services must be evaluated. We conducted such an analysis for low-income mothers in North Carolina (NC), providing a model for other states.
Methods
First, we analyzed the distribution of NC International Board Certified Lactation Consultants (IBCLCs) and county-level breastfeeding rates among low-income infants. Logistic regression was used to examine the association between IBCLC density and six-week breastfeeding duration. Finally, state advocates collaborated on a cost-benefit analysis of Medicaid coverage of IBCLCs.
Results
Maps of the NC breastfeeding support landscape indicate that IBCLCs are available to provide services to low-income women across the state. Compared to counties with no IBCLCs, those with high IBCLC density were found to have a six-week breastfeeding prevalence ratio of 1.20 (95% CI: 1.12, 1.28). Medicaid reimbursement of IBCLCs showed an estimated annual cost savings of $2.33 million.
Conclusions
In one state without Medicaid expansion, we found that breastfeeding support resources are available across the state, high density IBCLC support is associated with increased breastfeeding by low-income mothers, and services are cost-effective. Our model for Medicaid reimbursement in NC provides a framework for states to improve equity in access to optimal lactation support.
Controversy still exists as to the best laboratory method to use to screen newborns for sickle cell disease and other hemoglobinopathies. The proposed methods include hemoglobin electrophoresis, column chromatography, isoelectric focusing, and high performance liquid chromatography. There is also debate concerning the preferred method of sample collection. The proposed methods of sample collection include cord blood or blood obtained from the infant collected in a tube with anticoagulant or on filter paper.
We compared hemoglobin electrophoresis patterns from infant blood samples collected in heparinized capillary tubes and on filter paper. This comparison was performed because hemoglobin electrophoresis of dried blood samples collected on filter paper has been advocated as a practical, reliable, and inexpensive method for mass screening programs, although the limitations of this technique have not been explored fully. We also summarize data from the North Carolina Newborn Hemoglobinopathy Screening Program, which relates to the advantages and limitations of hemoglobin electrophoresis from filter paper blood specimens.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Specimens
Four sets of specimens were used for this study: (1) specimens collected at Duke University Medical Center to compare hemoglobin electrophoresis patterns of hemolysates from filter paper and heparinized capillary tubes, (2) specimens collected by the North Carolina program for hemoglobinopathy screening, (3) specimens routinely collected at Duke University in heparinized capillary tubes for newborn hemoglobinopathy screening, and (4) samples for retesting to examine the error rate of the state program and to confirm screening results compatible with a hemoglobinopathy.
Samples for Direct Comparison Between Filter Paper and Heparinized Specimens
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.