Elderly traumatic brain injury patients have a worse mortality and functional outcome than nonelderly patients who present with head injury even though their head injury and overall injuries are seemingly less severe.

We evaluated auditory working memory in 41 HIV-seropositive (HIV+) and 37 HIV-seronegative (HIV−) male drug users, employing a modified version of the Letter-Number Span Task developed by Gold and colleagues. We added a control condition to the standard task in order to evaluate more directly the contribution of the processing component to the working memory deficits with the effects of storage demands minimized. HIV+ subjects performed significantly more poorly compared to controls on an index of working memory processing derived from raw scores obtained under the two testing conditions. These findings are consistent with our previous reports that HIV-related working memory deficits are evident across multiple informational domains; further, the deficit appears to involve multiple-component functions of working memory. Converging findings from recent working memory studies and from primate and neuroimaging investigations suggest that functional abnormalities of prefrontal cortex should receive greater emphasis in models of neurocognitive aspects of HIV-1 infection, which have typically emphasized “subcortical” deficits. (JINS, 2001, 7, 20–26.)

Field intubation is an independent strong negative predictor of survival or good functional outcome despite adjustment for severity of injury. Although not causal, the magnitude of these differences should lead to future controlled studies of pediatric trauma field intubations.

No abstract

There may be a risk-adjusted survival advantage for geriatric MVC patients treated at trauma centers with relatively higher volumes of geriatric MVC trauma and lower volumes of young adult non-MVC trauma. These results support consideration of age in trauma center transfer criteria.

No abstract

No abstract

Two data elements are needed for constructing a risk-adjusted X-bar chart. They are a continuous observed outcome collected over time across a sample of patients, and an expected outcome for each patient. The authors selected blood glucose levels to reflect diabetes control. They then reviewed data showing blood glucose levels of 60 Type 2 diabetes patients in a family practice clinic of five providers. The data covered a period of 21 consecutive months. They present the data relating to two of the providers using this set of data to demonstrate how to create a risk-adjusted X-bar control chart.