BackgroundPositron emission tomography (PET) imaging is routinely used in many cancer types, although is not yet a standard modality for prostate carcinoma. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET is a promising new modality for staging prostate cancer, with recent studies showing potential advantages over traditional computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and nuclear medicine bone scan imaging. However, the impact of PSMA PET on the decision-making of radiation oncologists and outcomes after radiotherapy is yet to be determined. Our aim was to determine the impact of PSMA PET on a radiation oncologist’s clinical practice.FindingsPatients in a radiation oncology clinic who underwent PSMA PET were prospectively recorded in an electronic oncology record. Patient demographics, outcomes of imaging, and impact on decision-making were evaluated.Fifty-four patients underwent PSMA PET between January and May 2015. The major reasons for undergoing PET included staging before definitive (14.8 %) or post-prostatectomy (33.3 %) radiotherapy, and investigation of PSA failures following definitive (16.7 %) or post-prostatectomy (33.3 %) radiotherapy. In 46.3 % of patients PSMA was positive after negative traditional imaging, in 9.3 % PSMA was positive after equivocal imaging, and in 13.0 % PSMA was negative after equivocal imaging. PSMA PET changed radiotherapy management in 46.3 % of cases, and hormone therapy in 33.3 % of patients, with an overall change in decision-making in 53.7 % of patients.ConclusionsPSMA PET has the potential to significantly alter the decision-making of radiation oncologists, and may become a valuable imaging tool in the future.
This study provides insights into how PSWs are perceived by psychiatrists. While broadly positive attitudes exist, the research highlights certain challenges, particularly role ambiguity.
Audit with comparative, individualized, educational feedback is cost-effective and positively perceived CME, significantly improving targeted RO behavior. Oncologists' CME design and evaluation require further research.
A SpaceOAR programme in a regional setting with urologists performing low volumes of insertions (<1 per month on average) is of clinical benefit, and was associated with significantly lower radiation doses to the rectum and lower rates of acute diarrhoea.
Thrombotic complications are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in cancer patients. Studies in Caucasian populations have shown that up to one-third of such patients test positive to antiphospholipid antibodies. Our aim was to determine the prevalence and serotypes of antiphospholipid antibodies in an unselected group of Asian cancer patients with thrombosis. All patients with cancer-related thrombosis seen in the Department of Hematology-Oncology and Radiation Oncology were enrolled in this study. The study period was from April 2000 to May 2001. Antiphospholipid antibodies tests were performed, namely lupus anticoagulant screen, anticardiolipin antibodies (IgG and IgM) and anti-beta-2 glycoprotein I antibodies (B2 GPI) IgG, IgM and IgA. Thirty-three patients were recruited. There were 14 males and 19 females, with an age range of 35-78 years of age. Of those enrolled, there were 25 Chinese, five Malays and three Indians. The patients had several cancer types: 11 (36.7%) patients had adenocarcinoma as the histological cell type. Of the 33 patients, 75.8% had stage IV disease. Arterial thrombosis was seen in eight patients (24.2%), and venous thrombosis occurred in 29 patients (87.9%). Antiphospholipid antibodies were positive in 60.6% of the patients, of which anti-B2GPI IgA antibody was the most prevalent antiphospholipid present (46.9%). The presence of anti-beta-2 glycoprotein I IgA antibody was associated with strokes, extensive and recurrent venous thrombosis, and coincident arterial and venous thrombosis. A high prevalence of antiphospholipid antibodies (60.6%) was found in Asian patients with cancer-related thrombosis. The presence of antiphospholipid antibodies, particularly anti B2GPI IgA, may identify a subset of cancer patients who are at high risk of developing thrombotic complications, and further studies are warranted.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.