Extraordinarily favorable reverse LV remodeling through CRT in CHF and LBBB appears to require a particularly dilated LV due to nonischemic heart disease with pronounced electromechanical alteration, but with a fairly preserved functional capacity before CRT.

The long-term mortality in this unselected population of ICD recipients was low. Patients treated for secondary prevention received earlier appropriate ICD therapy than patients treated for primary prevention. Long-term mortality was similar in both groups. The higher VT incidence of VTA was effectively treated by the ICD and was not associated with a higher mortality.

Frequent RVP is associated with impaired survival in ICD patients despite conservative pacing settings. Implantable cardioverter/defibrillator patients requiring concomitant bradycardia pacing should be cared for with particular attention to clinical worsening. Right ventricular pacing prevention and alternative modalities of ventricular pacing need prospective evaluation.

Chronic heart failure patients with LBBB treated with CRT-ICD, experience less and delayed VT/VF episodes compared with matched controls without LBBB receiving conventional ICD. In the long-term, CRT appears to exert antiarrhythmic effects and to attenuate the particularly high arrhythmia-related risk of CHF patients with LBBB. The incremental benefit of adding the ICD option to CRT pacing in LBBB patients appears questionable.

Evidence-based treatment for heart failure (HF) comprises beta-blockers, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, and aldosterone receptor antagonists (ARA). Diuretics (DR) are prescribed in acute and chronic HF, but their impact on survival and ventricular tachyarrhythmias (VT/VF) is unclear. The present observational study aims to examine the influence of DR and ARA on survival and appropriate cardioverter/defibrillator (ICD) treatment episodes in routine ICD patients. In 352 consecutive ICD patients (291 men, 60 ± 12 years, LVEF 34 ± 15%, follow-up 37 ± 19 months) overall survival and the time to a first appropriate VT/VF episode were assessed. Electrograms were validated. Potassium and creatinine serum levels and the medical treatment regimen for heart failure were documented at baseline. Multivariate Cox regression analyses revealed significantly worse survival for patients with DR compared to those without DR (OR 0.24, CI 0.08-0.76, P = 0.016), whereas the group with ARA had better survival compared to patients without (OR 2.05, CI 1.02-4.10, P = 0.04). Patient groups did not differ regarding survival without incident VT/VF (DR+ vs. DR-OR 1.10, CI 0.67-1.83, P = 0.70; OR 0.66, CI 0.40-1.09, P = 0.10). Long-term survival appears to be compromised in ICD patients receiving concomitant DR, but is favorably influenced by ARA, although VT/VF incidence does not differ. Randomized analyses are warranted to assess long-term prognostic effects of DR in HF.