The rate of production of methane in many environments depends upon mutualistic interactions between sulfate-reducing bacteria and methanogens. To enhance our understanding of these relationships, we took advantage of the fully sequenced genomes of Desulfovibrio vulgaris and Methanococcus maripaludis to produce and analyze the first multispecies stoichiometric metabolic model. Model results were compared to data on growth of the co-culture on lactate in the absence of sulfate. The model accurately predicted several ecologically relevant characteristics, including the flux of metabolites and the ratio of D. vulgaris to M. maripaludis cells during growth. In addition, the model and our data suggested that it was possible to eliminate formate as an interspecies electron shuttle, but hydrogen transfer was essential for syntrophic growth. Our work demonstrated that reconstructed metabolic networks and stoichiometric models can serve not only to predict metabolic fluxes and growth phenotypes of single organisms, but also to capture growth parameters and community composition of simple bacterial communities.
In methanogenic Archaea, the final step of methanogenesis generates methane and a heterodisulfide of coenzyme M and coenzyme B (CoM-S-S-CoB). Reduction of this heterodisulfide by heterodisulfide reductase to regenerate HS-CoM and HS-CoB is an exergonic process. Thauer et al. [Thauer, et al. 2008 Nat Rev Microbiol 6:579-591] recently suggested that in hydrogenotrophic methanogens the energy of heterodisulfide reduction powers the most endergonic reaction in the pathway, catalyzed by the formylmethanofuran dehydrogenase, via flavin-based electron bifurcation. Here we present evidence that these two steps in methanogenesis are physically linked. We identify a protein complex from the hydrogenotrophic methanogen, Methanococcus maripaludis, that contains heterodisulfide reductase, formylmethanofuran dehydrogenase, F 420 -nonreducing hydrogenase, and formate dehydrogenase. In addition to establishing a physical basis for the electronbifurcation model of energy conservation, the composition of the complex also suggests that either H 2 or formate (two alternative electron donors for methanogenesis) can donate electrons to the heterodisulfide-H 2 via F 420 -nonreducing hydrogenase or formate via formate dehydrogenase. Electron flow from formate to the heterodisulfide rather than the use of H 2 as an intermediate represents a previously unknown path of electron flow in methanogenesis. We further tested whether this path occurs by constructing a mutant lacking F 420 -nonreducing hydrogenase. The mutant displayed growth equal to wild-type with formate but markedly slower growth with hydrogen. The results support the model of electron bifurcation and suggest that formate, like H 2 , is closely integrated into the methanogenic pathway.energy conservation | Archaea | formate dehydrogenase | formylmethanofuran dehydrogenase | F 420 -nonreducing hydrogenase T he biochemical steps in methanogenesis from CO 2 are well known, but the interactions that lead to net energy conservation are not well understood. The steps in the pathway are diagrammed in Fig. 1 (1). The first step involves the reduction of CO 2 and covalent attachment to a unique cofactor, methanofuran (MFR), via the action of formylmethanofuran dehydrogenase (Fwd) to generate formyl-MFR. This represents an energy-consuming step in the pathway and is dependent on reduced ferredoxin, thought to be produced at the expense of a chemiosmotic membrane potential via the energy-conserving hydrogenase, Eha. Next, the formyl group is transferred to another carrier, tetrahydromethanopterin (H 4 MPT), and is then reduced to generate methyl-H 4 MPT. The methyl group is then transferred to yet another carrier, coenzyme M (HS-CoM), by methyl-H 4 MPT-CoM methyltransferase (Mtr) to generate methyl-S-CoM. At this point, Na + ions are translocated across the cell membrane. The final step involves reduction of the methyl group to CH 4 and capture of HS-CoM by coenzyme B (HS-CoB) to form a CoM-S-S-CoB heterodisulfide. To regenerate HS-CoM and HS-CoB, another enzyme is used, heterodisulfid...
The genome sequence of the genetically tractable, mesophilic, hydrogenotrophic methanogen Methanococcus maripaludis contains 1,722 protein-coding genes in a single circular chromosome of 1,661,137 bp. Of the protein-coding genes (open reading frames [ORFs]), 44% were assigned a function, 48% were conserved but had unknown or uncertain functions, and 7.5% (129 ORFs) were unique to M. maripaludis. Of the unique ORFs, 27 were confirmed to encode proteins by the mass spectrometric identification of unique peptides. Genes for most known functions and pathways were identified. For example, a full complement of hydrogenases and methanogenesis enzymes was identified, including eight selenocysteine-containing proteins, with each being paralogous to a cysteine-containing counterpart. At least 59 proteins were predicted to contain iron-sulfur centers, including ferredoxins, polyferredoxins, and subunits of enzymes with various redox functions. The methanogenic Archaea (methanogens) occupy a unique metabolic niche, as they produce methane, which is a useful energy source and a powerful greenhouse gas. These organisms are found in diverse anaerobic habitats, ranging from aquatic and marine sediments to sewage digesters and the rumens and large intestines of herbivores and other mammals (127). In these habitats, the degradation of organic matter results in the production of H 2 and other intermediates by fermentative organisms. By maintaining an extremely low partial pressure of H 2 , the methanogens keep fermentative pathways energetically favorable. In addition, some methanogens may occupy niches where hydrogen is produced predominately by geothermal reactions.Metabolically, methanogens are divided into those that specialize in CO 2 reduction and those that also use acetate and/or methyl compounds. The former group, the hydrogenotrophs, use H 2 as an electron donor to reduce CO 2 to methane. Many hydrogenotrophic species can substitute formate or certain low-molecular-weight alcohols and ketones for H 2 . Complete genome sequences have been published for three hydrogenotrophic methanogens, Methanocaldococcus jannaschii (13), Methanothermobacter thermautotrophicus (105), and Methanopyrus kandleri (104), all of which are thermophiles or hyperthermophiles. Of the methanogens that utilize acetate and methyl compounds, complete genome sequences have been published for two species, Methanosarcina acetivorans (26) and Methanosarcina mazei (19), both of which are mesophiles. In addition, partial sequences have been published for two psychrophiles, the hydrogenotroph Methanogenium frigidum and the methylotroph Methanolobus burtonii (97).Genome sequences of methanogens have answered many questions, but they have inspired many others. More than half of the genes in Methanocaldococcus jannaschii lack a predicted function (13), and this proportion has not declined significantly as other methanogen sequences have been determined. The proportions of genes of unknown functions, which are either homologous to other genes of unknown function...
Despite decades of study, electron flow and energy conservation in methanogenic Archaea are still not thoroughly understood. For methanogens without cytochromes, flavin-based electron bifurcation has been proposed as an essential energy-conserving mechanism that couples exergonic and endergonic reactions of methanogenesis. However, an alternative hypothesis posits that the energy-converting hydrogenase Eha provides a chemiosmosis-driven electron input to the endergonic reaction. In vivo evidence for both hypotheses is incomplete. By genetically eliminating all nonessential pathways of H 2 metabolism in the model methanogen Methanococcus maripaludis and using formate as an additional electron donor, we isolate electron flow for methanogenesis from flux through Eha. We find that Eha does not function stoichiometrically for methanogenesis, implying that electron bifurcation must operate in vivo. We show that Eha is nevertheless essential, and a substoichiometric requirement for H 2 suggests that its role is anaplerotic. Indeed, H 2 via Eha stimulates methanogenesis from formate when intermediates are not otherwise replenished. These results fit the model for electron bifurcation, which renders the methanogenic pathway cyclic, and as such requires the replenishment of intermediates. Defining a role for Eha and verifying electron bifurcation provide a complete model of methanogenesis where all necessary electron inputs are accounted for. M ethanogenesis is an anaerobic respiration carried out by a phylogenetically related group of Archaea within the phylum Euryarchaeota. Methanogens are divided into two metabolic types, those without and those with cytochromes (1). Methanogens without cytochromes use H 2 as an electron donor and are termed hydrogenotrophic. Some species can substitute H 2 with formate, and a few can use secondary alcohols. CO 2 is the electron acceptor and is reduced to methane. Methanogens with cytochromes reduce certain methyl compounds or the methyl carbon of acetate to methane and are called methylotrophic. Many can also use H 2 and CO 2 , as can hydrogenotrophic methanogens.Although the pathways of methanogenesis have long been known, an understanding of energy conservation has been slower to emerge. Methanogens with and without cytochromes both export Na + when a methyl group is transferred from the carrier tetrahydromethanopterin (H 4 MPT) to coenzyme M (CoM) (Fig. 1). The Na + gradient across the membrane is used directly for ATP synthesis or is converted by an antiporter to a proton gradient. However, for methanogenesis from CO 2 , the initial reduction of CO 2 to a formyl group attached to methanofuran (MFR) is endergonic. How energy is provided to drive this reaction is not well understood. Methanogens with and without cytochromes have membrane-associated energy-converting hydrogenases that couple the reduction of low-potential ferredoxins (Fd) to a chemiosmotic membrane gradient (2). If such a Fd donates electrons for CO 2 reduction, an energy-converting hydrogenase is the conduit of ener...
The enrichment and isolation in pure culture of a bacterium, identified as a strain of Desulfovibrio, able to release and reduce the sulfur of isethionate (2-hydroxyethanesulfonate) and other sulfonates to support anaerobic respiratory growth, is described. The sulfonate moiety was the source of sulfur that served as the terminal electron acceptor, while the carbon skeleton of isethionate functioned as an accessory electron donor for the reduction of sulfite. Cysteate (alanine-3-sulfonate) and sulfoacetaldehyde (acetaldehyde-2-sulfonate) could also be used for anaerobic respiration, but many other sulfonates could not. A survey of known sulfate-reducing bacteria revealed that some, but not all, strains tested could utilize the sulfur of some sulfonates as terminal electron acceptor. Isethionate-grown cells of Desulfovibrio strain IC1 reduced sulfonate-sulfur in preference to that of sulfate; however, sulfate-grown cells reduced sulfate-sulfur in preference to that of sulfonate.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.