Key Points Overall, no benefit of granulocyte transfusion therapy was observed, but the power of the study was reduced due to low accrual. Post hoc secondary analysis suggested that patients receiving higher doses tended to have better outcomes than those receiving lower ones.

These findings indicate that AMD3100 can be used alone or as an adjunct to G-CSF to mobilize cells for HPC transplantation.

The National Marrow Donor Program (NMDP) has been facilitating hematopoietic cell transplants since 1987. Volunteer donors listed on the NMDP Registry may be asked to donate either bone marrow (BM) or peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC); however, since 2003, the majority of donors (72% in 2007) have been asked to donate PBSC. From the donor's perspective these stem cell sources carry different recovery and safety profiles. The majority of BM and PBSC donors experienced symptoms during the course of their donation experience. Pain is the number 1 symptom for both groups of donors. BM donors most often reported pain at the collection site (82% back or hip pain) and anesthesia-related pain sites (33% throat pain; 17% post-anesthesia headache), whereas PBSC donors most often reported bone pain (97%) at various sites during filgrastim administration. Fatigue was the second most reported symptom by both BM and PBSC donors (59% and 70%, respectively). PBSC donors reported a median time to recovery of 1 week compared to a median time to recovery of 3 weeks for BM donors. Both BM and PBSC donors experienced transient changes in their WBC, platelet, and hemoglobin counts during the donation process, with most counts returning to baseline values by 1 month post-donation and beyond. Serious adverse events are uncommon, but these events occurred more often in BM donors than PBSC donors (1.34% in BM donors, 0.6% in PBSC donors) and a few BM donors may have long-term complications. NMDP donors are currently participating in a randomized clinical trial that will formally compare the clinical and quality-of-life outcomes of BM and PBSC donors and their graft recipients.

Six patients with cyclic neutropenia were treated with recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) for 3 to 15 months. All had a history of recurrent aphthous stomatitis, pharyngitis, lymphadenopathy, fever, and numerous infections during periods of neutropenia. Serial blood-cell counts, findings on bone marrow examination, and signs and symptoms were evaluated before and during the daily administration of G-CSF (3 to 10 micrograms per kilogram of body weight per day), either intravenously or subcutaneously. The kinetics of labeled autologous blood neutrophils and the migration of neutrophils to skin chambers were also measured. Recombinant human G-CSF increased the mean (+/- SEM) neutrophil counts from 717 +/- 171 per microliter to 9814 +/- 2198 per microliter (P = 0.009). In five of the six patients, the cycling of blood-cell counts continued, but the length of the period decreased from 21 to 14 days. The number of days of severe neutropenia was reduced (P = 0.002). Neutrophil turnover increased almost four-fold (P = 0.005), whereas neutrophil migration to a skin chamber was normal. G-CSF therapy reduced the frequency of oropharyngeal inflammation, fever, and infections in these patients. During the first 40 months of treatment, no typical mouth ulcers or bacterial infections occurred; recurrent gingivitis improved. We conclude that G-CSF is effective for the treatment of cyclic neutropenia in humans.

Therapeutic apheresis procedures are relatively safe, with a 4.75-percent overall incidence of mostly reversible adverse effects. Among the most commonly performed procedures, the risk is higher for blood component exchanges, especially if allogeneic red cell or plasma transfusion occurs, and lower for peripheral blood progenitor cell collection.

Leukoreduced blood products are reportedly comparable to cytomegalovirus (CMV)-seronegative products for the prevention of transfusion-transmitted CMV (TT-CMV) infection after stem cell (SC) transplantation. To determine if the incidence of TT-CMV was affected by the increasing use of leukoreduced blood products, we followed a prospective cohort of 807 CMV-seronegative SC transplant (SCT) recipients who underwent weekly surveillance using the pp65 antigenemia assay. The incidence of TT-CMV for 2 time periods was recorded: Period 1 (5/94-11/96), when only CMV-seronegative and/or filtered blood products were provided, and period 2 (12/96-2/00), when leukocyte-reduced platelets obtained by apheresis without filtration were also used. The incidence of TT-CMV was higher during period 2 (18/447, 4%) than period 1 (6/360, 1.7%) (P < .05); this was correlated with higher utilization of both filtered and apheresed products from CMV-positive donors in period 2. Multivariable analysis identified filtered red blood cell (RBC) units (but not apheresis platelet products) from CMVpositive donors as the primary predictor of TT-CMV: each additional filtered RBC unit was associated with a 32% increase in the odds for TT-CMV (95% confidence interval[CI]: 8%-61%, P ‫؍‬ .006). Pre-emptive therapy with ganciclovir after detection of antigenemia prevented all but one case of CMV disease prior to day 100. CMV-seronegative products may thus be superior to leukoreduced products (particularly filtered RBCs) for the prevention of TT-CMV. In an era of "universal leukoreduction," the abandonment of CMV-seronegative inventories appears premature, particularly among populations at high risk of CMV disease that do not receive active surveillance. (Blood. 2003;

We examined the feasibility of a community blood bank granulocyte transfusion program utilizing community donors stimulated with a single-dose regimen of subcutaneous granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) plus oral dexamethasone. The recipients of these transfusions were neutropenic stem cell transplantation patients with severe bacterial or fungal infection. Nineteen patients received 165 transfusions (mean 8.6 transfusions/patient, range 1-25). Community donors provided 94% of the transfusions; relatives accounted for only 6% of the transfusions. Sixty percent of the community donors initially contacted agreed to participate, and 98% of these individuals indicated willingness to participate again. Transfusion of 81.9 ± 2.3 × 109 neutrophils (mean ± SD) resulted in a mean 1-hour posttransfusion neutrophil increment of 2.6 ± 2.6 × 103/μL and restored the peripheral neutrophil count to the normal range in 17 of the 19 patients. The buccal neutrophil response, a measure of the capacity of neutrophils to migrate to tissue sites in vivo, was restored to normal in most patients following the transfusion. Chills, fever, and arterial oxygen desaturation of ≥ 3% occurred in 7% of the transfusions, but these changes were not sufficient to limit therapy. Infection resolved in 8 of 11 patients with invasive bacterial infections or candidemia. These studies indicate that transfusion of neutrophils from donors stimulated with G-CSF plus dexamethasone can restore a severely neutropenic patient's blood neutrophil supply and neutrophil inflammation response. Further studies are needed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of this therapy.

Dexamethasone significantly increases the level of neutrophilia induced in normal subjects by G-CSF. The combination of dexamethasone and G-CSF (at the dosages used in this study) is a convenient, well-tolerated regimen for the mobilization of PMNs in the peripheral blood of granulocyte donors. Moreover, the optimal quantitative yield of PMNs is likely to be achieved by leukapheresis 12 hours after drug administration.