Few studies have evaluated the relative importance of multiple plant traits to herbivore diet choice, especially with an experimental approach. Moreover, although circumstantial evidence points to plant toughness and silica content as important determinents of diet choice, few studies have experimentally demonstrated that these factors actually deter feeding by herbivores. We examined feeding preferences of a generalist salt‐marsh crab, Armases cinereum, for all the common angiosperms in its habitat. We took an experimental approach to evaluating the importance of toughness, secondary chemistry, silica, salt, and protein in determining feeding preferences. Consumption of plants by Armases in two experiments was correlated with decreasing toughness. Consumption was more equitable when plants were ground up and reconstituted in agar discs, with reduced differences in toughness. In four pairwise choice tests, Armases always preferred the softer plant of the pair, but in three of four cases exhibited no preference when the same plants were presented in reconstituted discs. Several plant extracts significantly stimulated or deterred feeding by Armases, but these effects were not consistent with and could not be used to predict overall preferences for fresh plants. Salt in artificial diets stimulated feeding by Armases. Silica had no effect on feeding in two experiments and stimulated feeding in a third. Armases was mildly stimulated to feed by high levels of protein in artificial diets, but these levels were above those found in plants, and the protein content of plants did not correlate with feeding preferences. Our results point towards plant toughness as most important in determining feeding choices of Armases. Since Armases is omnivorous, it may escape dietary constraints that affect feeding choices of pure herbivores. The dogma that silica defends plants against herbivory needs to be re‐examined with additional experimental studies.

No abstract

We examined the feeding preferences of 3 supralittoral crustacean species in the Pacific Northwest of North America. The isopod Ligia pallasii (Brandt, 1833), the rocky-shore amphipod Traskorchestia traskiana (Stimpson, 1857), and the sandy-beach amphipod Megalorchestia californiana (Brandt, 1851) had similar feeding preferences, suggesting that feeding preferences were based on general algal traits rather than on adaptations particular to specific herbivores. No single trait clearly distinguished low- and high-preference seaweeds, although pH and phenolic compounds may have been important for two chemically defended seaweeds (Desmarestia sp. and Fucus sp., respectively). Feeding preferences of L. pallasii were affected by dietary history, but effects were minor compared with differences among seaweeds. All 3 consumers tended to prefer wrack (aged, stranded seaweeds) over fresh seaweeds of the same species. Our results suggested that increased organic and mineral contents of wrack were important in mediating these preferences, but that toughness and salt and nitrogen contents were not. Reduced levels of defensive compounds may have made wrack more palatable than fresh seaweeds in the case of the two chemically defended seaweeds.

Bergmann's rule (body size increases with latitude) has long interested biologists; however, its mechanism remains unclear. An overlooked mechanism (latitudinal variation in plant quality) might help explain Bergmann's rule. We studied three herbivores. In the field, the planthopper Prokelisia and the sea hare Aplysia, but not the long-horned grasshopper Orchelimum, were larger at high latitudes, following Bergmann's rule. In the laboratory, all three species grew larger or faster on high-latitude plants. High-latitude diets increased Prokelisia size and Aplysia growth rates by 8% and 72%, respectively, enough to explain the increase in field body size toward high latitudes. Therefore, latitudinal variation in herbivore body size could be influenced by latitudinal variation in plant quality, which may directly or indirectly also affect body size in detritivores, parasitoids, and predators. Studies of Bergmann's rule should consider the influence of biotic factors on body size in addition to abiotic factors such as temperature and precipitation.

No abstract