No abstract

We have isolated and characterized two suppressor genes, SUI4 and SUI5, that can initiate translation in the absence of an AUG start codon at the HIS4 locus in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Both suppressor genes are dominant in diploid cells and lethal in haploid cells. The SUI4 suppressor gene is identical to the GCD11 gene, which encodes the ␥ subunit of the eIF-2 complex and contains a mutation in the G 2 motif, one of the four signature motifs that characterizes this subunit to be a G-protein. The SUI5 suppressor gene is identical to the TIF5 gene that encodes eIF-5, a translation initiation factor known to stimulate the hydrolysis of GTP bound to eIF-2 as part of the 43S preinitiation complex. Purified mutant eIF-5 is more active in stimulating GTP hydrolysis in vitro than wild-type eIF-5, suggesting that an alteration of the hydrolysis rate of GTP bound to the 43S preinitiation complex during ribosomal scanning allows translation initiation at a non-AUG codon. Purified mutant eIF-2␥ complex is defective in ternary complex formation and this defect correlates with a higher rate of dissociation from charged initiator-tRNA in the absence of GTP hydrolysis. Biochemical characterization of SUI3 suppressor alleles that encode mutant forms of the ␤ subunit of eIF-2 revealed that these mutant eIF-2 complexes have a higher intrinsic rate of GTP hydrolysis, which is eIF-5 independent. All of these biochemical defects result in initiation at a UUG codon at the his4 gene in yeast. These studies in light of other analyses indicate that GTP hydrolysis that leads to dissociation of eIF-2 ⅐ GDP from the initiator-tRNA in the 43S preinitiation complex serves as a checkpoint for a 3-bp codon/anticodon interaction between the AUG start codon and the initiator-tRNA during the ribosomal scanning process.

The human p68 kinase is an interferon‐regulated enzyme that inhibits protein synthesis when activated by double‐stranded RNA. We show here that when expressed in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the p68 kinase produced a growth suppressing phenotype resulting from an inhibition of polypeptide chain initiation consistent with functional protein kinase activity. This slow growth phenotype was reverted in yeast by two different mechanisms: expression of the p68 kinase N‐terminus, shown to bind double‐stranded RNA in vitro and expression of a mutant form of the alpha‐subunit of yeast initiation factor 2, altered at a single phosphorylatable site. These results provide the first direct in vivo evidence that the p68 kinase interacts with the alpha‐subunit of eukaryotic initiation factor 2. Sequence similarity with a yeast translational regulator, GCN2, further suggests that this enzyme may be a functional homolog in higher eukaryotes, where its normal function is to regulate protein synthesis through initiation factor 2 phosphorylation.

Yeast TFIIH that is active in transcription can be dissociated into three components: a 5-subunit core, the SSL2 gene product, and a complex of 47 kDa, 45 kDa, and 33 kDa polypeptides that possesses protein kinase activity directed towards the C-terminal repeat domain of RNA polymerase II. These three components can reconstitute fully functional TFIIH, and all three are required for transcription in vitro. By contrast, TFIIH that is highly active in nucleotide excision repair (NER) lacks the kinase complex and instead contains the products of all other genes known to be required for NER in yeast: RAD1, RAD2, RAD4, RAD10, and RAD14. This repairosome is not active in reconstituted transcription in vitro and is significantly more active than any of the constituent polypeptides in correcting defective repair in extracts from strains mutated in NER genes.

We initiated a genetic reversion analysis at the HIS4 locus to identify components of the translation initiation complex that are important for ribosomal recognition of an initiator codon. Three unlinked suppressor loci, suil, sui2, and SUI3, that restore expression of both HIS4 and HIS4-lacZ in the absence of an AUG initiator codon were identified. In previous studies, it was demonstrated that the sui2 and SUI3 genes encode mutated forms of the a and subunits, respectively, of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 (eIF-2). In this report, we describe the molecular and biochemical characterizations of the suil suppressor locus. The DNA sequence of the SUII + gene shows that it encodes a protein of 108 amino acids with a calculated Mr of 12,300. The suil suppressor genes all contain single base pair changes that alter a single amino acid within this 108-amino-acid sequence. suil suppressor strains that are temperature sensitive for growth on enriched medium have altered polysome profiles at the restrictive temperature typical of those caused by alteration of a protein that functions during the translation initiation process. Gene disruption experiments showed that the SUII + gene encodes an essential protein, and antibodies directed against the SUII+ coding region identified a protein with the predicted Mr in a ribosomal salt wash fraction. As observed for sui2 and SUI3 suppression events, protein sequence analysis of His4-4-galactosidase fusion proteins produced by suil suppression events indicated that a UUG codon is used as the site of translation initiation in the absence of an AUG start codon in HIS4. Changing the penultimate proline codon 3' to UUG at his4 to a Phe codon (UUC) blocks aminopeptidase cleavage of the amino-terminal amino acid of the His4-41-galactosidase protein, as noted by the appearance of Met in the first cycle of the Edman degradation reaction. The appearance of Met in the first cycle, as noted, in either a suil or a SUI3 suppressor strain showed that the mechanism of suppression is the same for both suppressor genes and allows the initiator tRNA to mismatch base pair with the UUG codon. This suggests that the Suil gene product performs a function similar to that of the , subunit of eIF-2 as encoded by the SUI3 gene. However, the Suil gene product does not appear to be a required subunit of eIF-2 on the basis of purification schemes designed to identify the GTP-dependent binding activity of eIF-2 for the initiator tRNA. In addition, suppressor mutations in the suil gene, in contrast to suppressor mutations in the sui2 or SUI3 gene, do not alter the GTP-dependent binding activity of eIF-2. The simplest interpretation of these studies is that the suil suppressor gene defines an additional factor that functions in concert with eIF-2 to enable tRNA"et to establish ribosomal recognition of an AUG initiator codon. The ribosomal scanning model has been proposed to account for fundamental features of eukaryotic mRNAs and basic steps during the pathway that leads to initiation of protein synt...