Background The incidence and impact of clinical stroke and silent radiographic cerebral infarction complicating open surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) are poorly characterized. Methods and Results We performed a prospective cohort study of subjects ≥ 65 years of age undergoing AVR for calcific aortic stenosis. Subjects were evaluated by neurologists pre-operatively and post-operatively, and underwent post-operative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Over a 4 year period, 196 subjects were enrolled at 2 sites. Mean age = 75.8 ± 6.2 years, 36% female, 6% non-white. Clinical strokes were detected in 17%, Transient Ischemic Attack in 2%, and in-hospital mortality was 5%. The frequency of stroke in the Society for Thoracic Surgery (STS) database in this cohort was 7%. Most strokes were mild; the median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) was 3 (interquartile range 1 – 9). Clinical stroke was associated with increased length of stay, median 12 vs 10 days, p = 0.02. Moderate or severe stroke (NIHSS ≥10) occurred in 8 (4%) and was strongly associated with in-hospital mortality, 38% vs 4%, p = 0.005. Of the 109 stroke-free subjects with post-operative MRI, silent infarct was identified in 59 (54%). Silent infarct was not associated with in-hospital mortality or increased length of stay. Conclusions Clinical stroke after AVR was more common than previously reported, more than double for this same cohort in the STS database, and silent cerebral infarctions were detected in over half of patients undergoing AVR. Clinical stroke complicating AVR is associated with increased length of stay and mortality.

No abstract

Blood transfusion is associated with immunosuppression, although the exact etiology of the immunosuppressive effect is not fully understood. The clinical significance of the immunosuppressive effect of blood transfusion has been examined in three situations: (1) studies of renal allograft survival after renal transplantation, (2) outcome studies in patients who have had surgical resection of solid cancer tumors, and (3) studies of infection rates in postoperative patients. In each scenario, the data support the conclusion that transfusion is associated with immunosuppression as manifested by increased renal allograft survival, increased recurrence and mortality rates in patients with cancer, and increased infection rates in postoperative patients who are transfused. Not a l l studies demonstrate an immunosuppressive effect of transfusion. There are several possible explanations for these discrepancies. First, prognostic variables other than transfusion itself account for the outcome results in these retrospective studies. Second, the extent of immunosuppression may be influenced by the type of blood product transfused, the amount transfused, and the timing of the transfusion; these factors have not been considered in all studies. For example, whole blood has been implicated as having a greater immunosuppressive effect than packed red blood cells, and many studies have shown that more than three units of packed red blood cells are necessary to affect outcome. Controlled animal studies have tested the hypothesis that transfusions increase solid tumor growth or the risk for infection. These studies have yielded conflicting results. Nevertheless, evidence that blood transfusion influences clinical outcome mitigates that a decision to transfuse must consider both risks and benefits of a transfusion; the possible consequences of immunosuppression must be included among the risk.Use of autologous blood, eqthropoietin, and, in the future, synthetic hemoglobin may lead to improved outcome in patients with certain disease processes.From the

No abstract