Serendipity is one of the many factors that may contribute to drug discovery. It has played a role in the discovery of prototype psychotropic drugs that led to modern pharmacological treatment in psychiatry. It has also played a role in the discovery of several drugs that have had an impact on the development of psychiatry. "Serendipity" in drug discovery implies the finding of one thing while looking for something else. This was the case in six of the twelve serendipitous discoveries reviewed in this paper, i.e., aniline purple, penicillin, lysergic acid diethylamide, meprobamate, chlorpromazine, and imipramine. In the case of three drugs, i.e., potassium bromide, chloral hydrate, and lithium, the discovery was serendipitous because an utterly false rationale led to correct empirical results; and in case of two others, i.e., iproniazid and sildenafil, because valuable indications were found for these drugs which were not initially those sought The discovery of one of the twelve drugs, chlordiazepoxide, was sheer luck.

Close collaboration between basic neuroscience and careful and informed clinical practice are likely to lead to continued progress.

No abstract

No abstract

Iproniazid and imipramine, the prototypes of monoamine oxidase inhibitor (MAOI) and monoamine (re)uptake inhibitor (MAUI) antidepressants, were introduced in 1957. The relationship between iproniazid's antidepressant effect and its MAO inhibiting property was tenuous. Because of the potential drug-drug interactions and the need for dietary restrictions, the use of MAOIs became restricted to atypical depression. The confounding of reserpine reversal with antidepressant effect led to the theory that MAU inhibition is responsible for imipramine's antidepressant effect. Driven by neuropharmacological theory, non-selective reuptake inhibitors were replaced first by selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, then by selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, and more recently, by a series of new antidepressants to relieve the stimulation of serotonin-5HT2A receptors and the compensatory decline of dopamine in the brain. Each antidepressant has its own identity, but meta-analyses indicate a widening of the antidepressant response range from 65-70% to 45-79%, and a lowering of the antidepressant threshold from 65% to 45%. Although one can no longer expect that 2 of 3 depressed patients will respond to treatment, the newer antidepressants are better tolerated, because they produce less anticholinergic side effects.