In this study of the orofacial formalin test in rats, the effects of different formalin concentrations (0.2%, 0.5%, 1.5%, 2.5%, 5% and 10%) on the behavioural nociceptive response (face rubbing) was investigated. The histological responses of the skin were also evaluated. Increasing the concentration of formalin caused a parallel aggravation of histological signs of tissue inflammation and injury. All concentrations provoked an early phase of nociceptive response, but its intensity was not concentration-dependent. The 2nd phase of response to formalin only occurred for concentrations of 1.5% and higher. A positive relationship between the formalin concentration and the amplitude of the rubbing activity measured between 12 and 45 min after injection could be observed until 2.5% but with the highest concentrations (5 and 10%), the amplitude of the response decreased. Our findings indicate that the orofacial formalin test should be carried out using concentration between 0.5 and 2.5%. This is essential to assess increase as well as decrease in pain intensity. Moreover, this will have the effect of minimizing the suffering of the experimental animal.

Purpose: This study evaluated the trends and factors associated with maxillofacial fractures treated from 1997 to 2007 in the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department of the Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital. Material and Methods: This study included 364 patients of which 82% were men and 45%, 20-29-years old. The etiology, anatomical distribution, treatment modality and complications of maxillofacial fractures were examined. Results: Overall, interpersonal violence, traffic accidents and falls were the most common mechanisms of injury. There was a decreasing trend in traffic accidents and increasing one in falls as a cause of fracture over the 11-years period of this study. Young male patients were preferentially victim of interpersonal violence and traffic accidents, while middle-aged ones were of falls and work-related accidents. Middle-aged female patients were preferentially victim of traffic accidents and interpersonal violence, while older ones were of falls. And the number of fractures per patient varied according to the mechanism of injury: low after work-related accidents and high after traffic accidents. About two-third of fractures involved the mandible. Most of these mandibular fractures were treated by osteosynthesis with or without intermaxillary fixation, with the proportion of the latter increasing over time. There were very few postoperative infections and only in mandible. Conclusions: Maxillofacial fractures predominantly occur in young men, due to interpersonal violence. There is nevertheless an increasing trend in falls as a cause of fracture, especially in female patients, consistent with the increasing trend in presentation of older people. Most maxillofacial fractures involve the mandible and there is an increasing trend in treating these fractures by osteosynthesis without intermaxillary fixation. Antibiotic prophylaxis associated with dental hygiene care can be indicated to prevent postoperative infections. Key words:Maxillofacial fractures, Epidemiology, Trends, Influencing factors, Fall, Age, Gender, Antibiotic prophylaxis.

Cutaneous allodynia (CA), pain in response to innocuous cutaneous stimuli, is recognized as a sign of central sensitization during migraine episodes. It is either restricted within the pain area on the ipsilateral head, or extends within and outside the head. Moreover, CA can be elicited in response to thermal (heat or cold) and/or mechanical stimuli. This raises the question as to whether cephalic and extracephalic CAs share the same properties. We assessed cephalic and extracephalic CAs in migraine episodic patients using a questionnaire completed at home during migraine attacks. A total of 67 episodic migraine patients (58 women, nine men; 4013 years old) addressed all questions in the questionnaire. Forty-nine patients (73%) cited one or more allodynic symptoms during or immediately after the migraine attack. Almost all 49 patients reported cephalic CA, whereas 24 (49%) also reported extracephalic CA. Occurrence and extension of CA correlated (P = 0.005) with headache intensity. Modalities of cephalic and extracephalic CA were different (chi2 = 12.03; P = 0.002), extracephalic CA being mostly thermal (75%) whereas cephalic CA was mostly mechanical (92%). This suggests that cephalic and extracephalic CAs involve different mechanisms.

Down syndrome induces a neuromotor deficiency that affects the orofacial musculature, and thus could be implicated in the feeding difficulties affecting people with this disease. This study aimed to investigate the differences in chewing indicators between a group of 11 adults with Down syndrome and a group of 12 healthy subjects without Down syndrome. Chewing ability was evaluated by means of video recordings taken during a standardized meal that included 10 natural foods. The variables collected were masticatory time, number of masticatory cycles, chewing frequency, number of open masticatory cycles, and number of food refusals. There were several differences in both directions for masticatory time and number of masticatory cycles between the two groups. In addition, with the exception of purée, the group with Down syndrome had significantly lower mean chewing frequency than the reference group, and was unable to eat all the foods presented.