Background:The validity of dementia diagnoses in the Danish nationwide hospital registers was evaluated to determine the value of these registers in epidemiological research about dementia. Methods: Two hundred patients were randomly selected from 4,682 patients registered for the first time with a dementia diagnosis in the last 6 months of 2003. The patients’ medical journals were reviewed to evaluate if they fulfilled ICD-10 and/or DSM-IV criteria for dementia and specific dementia subtypes. The patients who were still alive in 2006 were invited to an interview. Results: One hundred and ninety-seven journals were available for review and 51 patients were interviewed. A registered diagnosis of dementia was found to be correct in 169 (85.8%) cases. Regarding dementia subtypes, the degree of agreement between the registers and the results of the validating process was low with a kappa of 0.36 (95% CI 0.24–0.48). Conclusion: The validity of dementia syndrome in the Danish hospital registers was high and allows for epidemiological studies about dementia. Alzheimer’s disease, although underregistered, also had a good validity once the diagnosis was registered. In general, other ICD-10 dementia subtypes in the registers had a low validity and are less suitable for epidemiological research.

Background: This study aimed to determine whether there is an association between hysterectomy and dementia. Methods: All female Danish residents born before 1966, alive on their 40th birthday and without a dementia diagnosis prior to 1977 (n = 2,313,388) were followed from January 1, 1977, or the age of 40, whichever came later, until dementia diagnosis, death, emigration or December 31, 2006, whichever came first. The relative risks (RR) for developing dementia in women with hysterectomy/oophorectomy compared to referent women were calculated. Results: Overall, hysterectomy did not increase the risk of dementia. When stratified by age at dementia diagnosis, hysterectomy was associated with an increased risk for early-onset dementia before the age of 50: hysterectomy alone (RR = 1.38, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.07–1.78), with unilateral oophorectomy (RR = 2.10, 95% CI = 1.28–3.45), with bilateral oophorectomy (RR = 2.33, 95% CI = 1.44–3.77). The younger the age at hysterectomy/oophorectomy, the greater was the risk. Conclusions: Although statistically significant, the association between premenopausal hysterectomy and early-onset dementia is uncertain due to study limitations. Premenopausal bilateral oophorectomy is associated with a higher risk, suggesting a dose effect of premature estrogen deficiency on dementia. The age-dependent effect suggests that the younger brain is probably more vulnerable to estrogen deficiency.

This paper reviews and discusses existing barriers to diagnosis and treatment for patients with dementia in Europe as well as approaches to overcome these barriers. The barriers to care are manifold, being present at all levels in each society and between countries in Europe. Multilevel and multifaceted strategies are needed to improve diagnosis and treatments for all patients with cognitive complaints. A multidisciplinary approach based on close collaboration between GPs and specialised memory clinics may be the ideal model for early accurate diagnosis and subsequently early pharmacological and psychosocial interventions. For all healthcare professionals, there should be specialised training in dementia and frequently updated practice guidelines to provide the framework for standards of care. Culture-sensitive strategies to promote public knowledge and destigmatize dementia are essential. Policy makers and authorities should be made aware of the benefits of early access to diagnosis and treatment.

ObjectivesTo examine the long-term efficacy at the 36-month follow-up of an early psychosocial counselling and support programme lasting 8–12 months for community-dwelling patients with mild Alzheimer's disease and their caregivers.DesignMulticentre, randomised, controlled, rater-blinded trial.SettingPrimary care and memory clinics in five Danish districts.Participants330 home-dwelling patients with mild Alzheimer's disease and their primary caregivers (dyads).InterventionsDyads were randomised to receive intervention during the first year after diagnosis. Both intervention and control groups had follow-up visits at 3, 6, 12 and 36 months.Main outcome measuresPrimary outcomes for the patients assessed at 36-month follow-up were changes from baseline in global cognitive function (Mini-Mental State Examination), depressive symptoms (Cornell Depression Scale) and proxy-rated EuroQoL quality of life on visual analogue scale. The primary outcomes for the caregivers were changes from baseline in depressive symptoms (Geriatric Depression Scale) and self-rated EuroQoL quality of life on a visual analogue scale. The secondary outcome measures for the patient were proxy-rated Quality of Life Scale for Alzheimer's disease (QoL-AD), Neuropsychiatric Inventory-Questionnaire, Alzheimer's disease Cooperative Study Activities of Daily Living Scale, all-cause mortality and nursing home placement.ResultsAt a 36-month follow-up, 2 years after the completion of the Danish Alzheimer Intervention Study (DAISY), the unadjusted positive effects previously detected at the 12-month follow-up in one patient primary outcome (Cornell depression score) and one patient secondary outcome (proxy-rated QoL-AD) disappeared (Cornell depression score, p=0.93; proxy-rated QoL-AD, p=0.81). No long-term effect of DAISY intervention on any other primary and secondary outcomes was found at the 36-month follow-up.ConclusionsFor patients with very mild Alzheimer's disease and their caregivers, an intensive, multi-component, semitailored psychosocial intervention programme with counselling, education and support during the first year after diagnosis did not show any positive long-term effect on primary and secondary outcomes. Trial registrationThe study was registered in the Clinical Trial Database (http://www.controlled-trials.com/ISRCTN74848736).

The A-RUDAS is proposed for dementia screening in clinical practice and in research in Arabic-speaking populations with an optimal cutoff of ≤22.

Background: To study the trend of diagnosing dementia in the secondary health care sector over time, we conducted a nationwide longitudinal study of the incidence and prevalence of registered dementia diagnoses in the Danish national hospital registers. Methods: All Danish residents born before 1964 and alive at their 40th birthday were followed from their 40th birthday or January 1, 1970, whichever came later, to the date of the first dementia diagnosis recorded in the hospital registers, the date of emigration, date of death, or December 31, 2004, whichever came first. The age- and period-specific incidence and prevalence of dementia were calculated and compared to estimates from large community-based cohort studies in Europe. Results: The study population consisted of 4,723,838 persons with 81,090,583 person-years of follow-up. 154,152 dementia cases were registered from 1970 to 2004. The incidence and prevalence of registered dementia diagnoses showed an increasing trend over time. In 2003, the age-standardized incidence rate ratio was 0.66 when compared to estimates from large European community-based cohort studies. Conclusions: The study shows a marked improvement in the diagnostic rate of dementia in secondary care over time and indicates that this sector can be an important point of entry for patients with dementia.

Dementia is under-diagnosed to a greater extent among ethnic minorities in the age group 60 years and older but is over-diagnosed in the age group younger than 60 years. Several factors may contribute to this pattern, including cultural differences in help-seeking behaviour, and problems in navigating the health-care system. Furthermore, cross-cultural assessment of dementia can be difficult because of language barriers and cultural differences.

Background/Aims: Diagnostic evaluation of dementia for ethnic minority patients may be challenging. This study aimed to evaluate the quality of diagnostic evaluation of dementia for patients from ethnic minorities in Denmark. Methods: The Danish national hospital registers were used to identify patients from the main ethnic minority groups in Denmark, who were diagnosed with dementia in the period 2005–2007. Three raters independently reviewed the patients’ medical records. Data were compared to data from a previous similar study in the general Danish population. Results: Fifty-seven medical records were reviewed. An acceptable diagnostic workup was documented in only 23% of the patients. Dementia diagnosis was confirmed in 35%. Significant differences in the quality of the diagnostic evaluation were found between patients from ethnic minorities and the general population. Conclusion: There are significant ethnic disparities in the quality of diagnostic evaluations and outcome of dementia in the secondary healthcare sector.