Seventeen fully sequenced and two partially sequenced extracytoplasmic proteins of purple, gram-negative bacteria constitute a homologous family termed the putative membrane fusion protein (MFP) family. Each such protein apparently functions in conjunction with a cytoplasmic membrane transporter of the ATP-binding cassette family, major facilitator superfamily, or heavy metal resistance/nodulation/cell division family to facilitate transport of proteins, peptides, drugs, or carbohydrates across the two membranes of the gram-negative bacterial cell envelope. Evidence suggests that at least some of these transport systems also function in conjunction with a distinct outer membrane protein. We report here that the phylogenies of these proteins correlate with the types of transport systems with which they function as well as with the natures of the substrates transported. Characterization of the MFPs with respect to secondary structure, average hydropathy, and average similarity provides circumstantial evidence as to how they may allow localized fusion of the two gram-negative bacterial cell membranes. The membrane fusion protein of simian virus 5 is shown to exhibit significant sequence similarity to representative bacterial MFPs.

Screening of the complete genome sequence from the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae reveals that 28 open reading frames (ORFs) are homologous to each other and to established bacterial members of the drug‐resistant subfamily of the major facilitator superfamily. The phylogenesis of these protein sequences shows that they fall into three major clusters. Cluster I contains 12 ORFs, cluster II contains ten ORFs and cluster III contains six ORFs. Hydropathy analyses indicate that in clusters II and III ORFs, 14 transmembrane spans are predicted whereas only 12 transmembrane spans are predicted in cluster I ORFs. Three ORFs that have known functions as multidrug‐resistance pumps in other yeast species such as Schizosaccharomyces pombe (CAR1), Candida albicans (BMRP) or C. maltosa (CYHR), also fall into cluster I. Two S. cerevisiae ORFs of known multidrug‐resistance function (ATR1, SGE1) fall into cluster II. Cluster III consists exclusively of ORFs of unknown function but binary sequence comparisons show homology to ORFs from cluster II. Analysis of the multiple alignment for these proteins leads to the identification of characteristic signature sequences for each of the three clusters. © 1997 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

For large-scale analysis of complex protein mixtures, liquid chromatography – tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) has been proven to be one of the most versatile tools due to its high sensitivity...