Background: Epigenetic scores (EpiScores) can provide blood-based biomarkers of lifestyle and disease risk. Projecting a new individual onto a reference panel would aid precision medicine and risk communication but is challenging due to the separation of technical and biological sources of variation with array data. Normalisation methods can standardize data distributions but may also remove population-level biological variation. Methods: We compared two independent birth cohorts (Lothian Birth Cohorts of 1921 and 1936: nLBC1921= 387 and nLBC1936= 498) with DNA methylation assessed at the same chronological age (79 years) and processed in the same lab but in different years and experimental batches. We examined the effect of 15 normalisation methods on a BMI EpiScore (trained in an external cohort of 18,413 individuals) when the cohorts were normalised separately and together. Results: The BMI EpiScore explained a maximum variance of R2=24.5% in BMI in LBC1936 after SWAN normalisation. Although there were differences in the variance explained across cohorts, the normalisation methods made minimal differences to the estimates within cohorts. Conversely, a range of absolute differences were seen for individual-level EpiScore estimates when cohorts were normalised separately versus together. While within-array methods result in identical BMI EpiScores whether a cohort was normalised on its own or together with the second dataset, a range of differences were observed for between-array methods. Conclusions: Using normalisation methods that give similar EpiScores whether cohorts are analysed separately or together will minimise technical variation when projecting new data onto a reference panel. These methods are especially important for cases where when raw data and joint normalisation of cohorts is not possible or is computationally expensive.
Genlisea aurea (Lentibulariaceae) is a carnivorous plant that grows on waterlogged sandstone plateaus. It is thought to have evolved carnivory as an adaptation to very low nitrogen levels in its habitat. G. aurea is also unusual for having one of the smallest genomes among flowering plants. Despite DNA having a high nitrogen content, to the author's knowledge, no published study has linked nitrogen starvation of G. aurea with genome size reduction. This comparative study of the carnivorous plant Genlisea aurea, the model organism Arabidopsis thaliana (Brassicaceae) and the nitrogen fixing Trifolium pratense (Fabaceae) attempts to investigate whether the genome, transcriptome and proteome of G. aurea showed evidence of adaptations to low nitrogen availability. It was found that although G. aurea's genome, CDS and non-coding DNA were much lower in nitrogen than the genome of T. pratense and A. thaliana this was solely due to the length of the genome, CDS and non-coding sequences rather than the composition of these sequences.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.