The present multicenter, randomized crossover study compared the safety and efficacy of continuous infusion with those of short infusions of ceftazidime in patients with cystic fibrosis. Patients with chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa colonization received two successive courses of intravenous tobramycin and ceftazidime (200 mg/kg of body weight/day) for pulmonary exacerbation administered as thrice-daily short infusions or as a continuous infusion. The primary endpoint was the variation in the forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV 1 ) during the course of antibiotic treatment. Sixty-nine of the 70 patients enrolled in the study received at least one course of antibiotic treatment. The improvement in FEV 1 at the end of therapy was not statistically different between the two treatment procedures (؉7.6% after continuous infusion and ؉5.5% after short infusions) but was better after continuous ceftazidime treatment in patients harboring resistant isolates (P < 0.05). The interval between the course of antibiotic treatments was longer after the continuous infusion than after the short infusion of ceftazidime (P ‫؍‬ 0.04). The mean serum ceftazidime concentration during the continuous infusion was 56.2 ؎ 23.2 g/ml; the mean peak and trough concentrations during the short infusions were 216.3 ؎ 71.5 and 12.1 ؎ 8.7 g/ml, respectively. The susceptibility profiles of the P. aeruginosa isolates remained unchanged and were similar for both regimens. Quality-of-life scores were similar whatever the treatment procedure, but 82% of the patients preferred the continuous-infusion regimen. Adverse events were not significantly different between the two regimens. In conclusion, the continuous infusion of ceftazidime did not increase its toxicity and appeared to be as efficient as short infusions in patients with cystic fibrosis as a whole, but it gave better results in patients harboring resistant isolates of P. aeruginosa.

Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) of human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients is associated with adverse effects, such as lipodystrophy and hyperlipidemia. The lipodystrophic syndrome is characterized by a peripheral lipoatrophy and/or fat accumulation in the abdomen and neck. In order to get insights into the physiopathological mechanisms underlying this syndrome, we treated mice with protease inhibitors (PIs) over a long period of time. Although atazanavir-treated mice presented the same circulating triglyceride concentration as control mice, lopinavir-ritonavir-treated mice rapidly became hypertriglyceridemic, with triglyceride levels of 200 mg/dl, whereas control and atazanavir-treated animals had triglyceride levels of 80 mg/dl. These results obtained with mice reproduce the metabolic disorder observed in humans. White adipose tissue (WAT) was analyzed after 8 weeks of treatment. Compared to the control or atazanavir treatment, lopinavir-ritonavir treatment induced a significant 25% weight reduction in the peripheral inguinal WAT depot. By contrast, the profound epididymal WAT depot was not affected. This effect was associated with a 5.5-fold increase in SREBP-1c gene expression only in the inguinal depot. Our results demonstrate that the long-term treatment of mice with PIs constitutes an interesting experimental model with which some aspects of the lipoatrophy induced by HAART in humans may be studied.Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) combines various protease inhibitors (PIs), nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), and nonnucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs). Whereas HAART efficiently suppresses human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) replication, long-term treatment of HIV-infected patients has been associated with a lipodystrophic syndrome and metabolic complications, with one of the most common complications being hypertriglyceridemia (6). The HAART-associated lipodystrophy is characterized by peripheral fat wasting in the face and limbs and the accumulation of visceral fat, breast hypertrophy, and cervical fat pads (buffalo hump) (7-9). Metabolic complications are preferentially associated with PI treatment and appear much more rapidly than lipodystrophy (20). It is not known whether the latter is a long-term consequence of the metabolic disorder or whether it corresponds to distinct molecular mechanisms. Because of the lack of a pertinent experimental model, the pathogenesis and physiopathological mechanisms by which PIs, NRTIs, and NNRTIs cause HAARTassociated lipodystrophy and metabolic disorders remain to be elucidated.PIs, NRTIs, and NNRTIs can interfere with adipocyte differentiation and adipocyte-specific gene expression (16,18,22,(26)(27)(28)(29). However, the reported effects are quite variable, positive or negative, depending on the molecule and on the experimental model studied. Furthermore, these cellular studies do not explain why HAART leads, in one case, to peripheral lipoatrophy and, in the other case, to abdominal...

The administration of ropivacaine 3.5 mg x kg(-1) can be associated with sustained high plasma concentrations of ropivacaine, outside the tolerable range. In view of these results, we recommend the use of lower ropivacaine dosage during FIC block in children.

No abstract