This study was performed with the aim of determining the palatability of diets containing poultry and swine protein hydrolysates for Nile tilapia. Five experimental diets were made with a 5% inclusion level of fishmeal (FPE), poultry protein hydrolysate (PHF), liquid swine hydrolysate (PHS), feather protein hydrolysate (PHP), and swine mucosa hydrolysate (PHM). Five juveniles (2.81 ± 0.17 g) were placed in 10 L aquariums and fed five times a day after a raffle of offered diets. In each feeding throughout the day, 30 pellets were offered per fish. The experimental design was completely randomized, with five replicates per day. A three-minute footage period was established for each feeding with a digital camera. The following feeding behaviors were observed: time to capture the first pellet, number of pellet rejections, number of approaches without capturing the pellet, and number of consumed pellets. No observed parameters presented significant differences (p > 0.05). PHF provided a palatability index of 12.27%, while PHM had an index of 9.33%, PHF of 8.77%, and PHP of 7.74%. Both diets PHS and PHM increased the final consumption of pellets in comparison to FPE by more than 10%, despite the absence of a significant effect.

The experiment was conducted with the aim of determining the attractability and palatability of liquid protein hydrolysates for Nile tilapia. Five experimental diets were formulated containing 5% inclusion of fishmeal (FPE; positive control), 5% inclusion of liquid protein hydrolysate of porcine mucosa (PHM), 5% inclusion of liquid protein hydrolysate of poultry (PHF), 5% inclusion of liquid fish oil (OPE) and a diet without fishmeal (negative control). Five juveniles (2.51 ± 0.13 g) were distributed in 10 L tanks, and the animals were fed five times a day, with a previous draw being made of the offered diets. The same amount of pellets was offered and the following feeding behaviours were evaluated with the aid of three‐minute footages per feeding: time to capture first pellet, number of rejections, number of approaches without capturing the pellet and number of consumed pellets. None of the observed parameters displayed significant differences (p > .05), and all diets presented negative palatability indexes in comparison to FPE. The SPE diet provided a attractability and palatability index of 6.17%, while OPE index was 2.87%, PHM 2.82% and PHF 2.74%. Both PHF and PHM reduced the final consumption of pellets in comparison to FPE in approximately 28% and 20%, respectively, although it did not present significant values.

This study aimed at evaluating diets containing protein hydrolysate from poultry byproducts and swine liver (PHPPL), at different inclusion levels, for Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) juveniles. Seven diets were evaluated, being a negative control (free of both hydrolysate and fishmeal) and positive control (free of hydrolysate but containing fishmeal), besides five diets with 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5% inclusion of the mixed protein hydrolysate. Significant effects were observed regarding the animals' final length, with higher values with the 1% inclusion level than the negative control. The liver's quantitative evaluation revealed that inclusions above 3% might lead to severe alterations in the organ's morphology. The use of PHPPL in the diets that did not contain fishmeal has shown to be effective in maintaining the performance parameters of Nile tilapia. Thus, its use is recommended considering an inclusion level of 3%.