The objective of this work was to establish the quantitative relationship between Lanreotide Autogel® (LAN) on serum chromogranin A (CgA) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with nonfunctioning gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) through an integrated pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model. In CLARINET, a phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 204 patients received deep subcutaneous injections of LAN 120 mg (n = 101) or placebo (n = 103) every 4 weeks for 96 weeks. Data for 810 LAN and 1298 CgA serum samples (n = 632 placebo and n = 666 LAN) were used to develop a parametric time-to-event model to relate CgA levels and PFS (76 patients experienced disease progression: n = 49 placebo and n = 27 LAN). LAN serum profiles were described by a one-compartment disposition model. Absorption was characterized by two parallel pathways following first- and zero-order kinetics. As PFS data were considered informative dropouts, CgA and PFS responses were modeled jointly. The LAN-induced decrease in CgA levels was described by an inhibitory E MAX model. Patient age and target lesions at baseline were associated with an increment in baseline CgA. Weibull model distribution showed that decreases in CgA from baseline reduced the hazard of disease progression significantly (P < 0.001). Covariates of tumor location in the pancreas and tumor hepatic tumor load were associated with worse prognosis (P < 0.001). We established a semimechanistic PK/PD model to better understand the effect of LAN on a surrogate endpoint (serum CgA) and ultimately the clinical endpoint (PFS) in treatment-naive patients with nonfunctioning GEP-NETs.
Using two mechanisms of absorption, the pharmacokinetics of lanreotide Autogel were well-described in patients with GEP-NET. None of the patient characteristics tested were of clinical relevance to potential dose adjustment in clinical practice.
397 Background: Lanreotide Autogel (Depot in US) has been shown in clinical trials to have antitumor effects and control symptoms associated with hormone hypersecretion in GEP NET patients. Objectives: To describe the PK of Lanreotide 60, 90, or 120 mg SC injections every 4 weeks in GEP NET patients, to quantify inter-patient variability (IPV) and to identify PK impacting patient characteristics. Methods: 1,541 serum concentrations were obtained from 290 patients and analysed simultaneously using the population approach with the software NONMEM version 7.2. The covariates evaluated included demographics, renal and hepatic function markers, and disease related information. Results: Serum profiles were described with a one-compartment disposition model and with an absorption process characterized by two parallel absorption pathways following first and zero order kinetics. The estimated apparent volume of distribution was 18.3 L. The estimated apparent total serum clearance for a typical 74 kg patient was 513 L/day. No covariate tested showed a statistically significant effect on the PK profile except body weight, which showed a moderate effect on clearance (clearance increased by 25% as weight increased by 30%). However, when comparing a subject with low weight (51 kg) to a subject with high weight (104 kg), their PK profiles were similar with a great degree of overlapping. Therefore, this weight effect on clearance was not considered clinically relevant. The magnitude of IPV was low for clearance (27%) and moderate for absorption constant (61%). However due to the lack of PK timepoints around the Cmax, a higher IPV was observed for volume of distribution (150%). Mean (SD) derived parameters AUC and Cmaxat steady-state were respectively 239 (64.8) ng.day/mL and 13.9 (7.44) ng/mL, showing moderate IPV in the PK profile. Conclusions: The PK of lanreotide Autogel/Depot was well characterized in GEP NET patients using two mechanisms of absorption. The IPVof the PK of lanreotide was moderate. Among all the patients characteristics tested, none were found clinically relevant to a potential dose adjustment in clinical practice.
5049^ Background: Both Cbz and AA have demonstrated significantly improved survival in randomized Ph 3 studies in pts with mCRPC and progressive disease after D treatment. Cbz and AA have established non-overlapping adverse event (AE) profiles. A Ph 1/2 study was initiated to investigate the combination of Cbz + AA for the treatment of mCRPC (NCT01511536). Methods: Pts with progressive mCRPC after D were enrolled. The primary objectives were to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of Cbz + AA (Ph 1), and the PSA response rate (RR) with this combination (Ph 2). Secondary endpoints included AEs, pharmacokinetics (PK) and efficacy. All pts received oral AA 1000 mg QD and P 5 mg BID. In Ph 1, pts received 1 of 2 dose levels (DL) of Cbz (20 and 25 mg/m2 IV Q3W) according to a 3+3 design. A 2-cycle DLT observation period was used. Here, we report results of Ph 1. Results: Ten pts were enrolled in Ph 1; 9 were evaluable: 3 at DL1 and 6 at DL2 completed 2 cycles without DLTs (total number of cycles = 46). In general, AEs were Grade (Gr) 1/2; the most frequent all-Gr AEs by pt cycle were asthenia (39%), diarrhea (37%; Gr 3 in 1 pt), back pain (26%), nausea (20%), constipation (20%), anemia (17%), decreased appetite (17%) and fatigue (15%; Gr 3 in 2 pts). In the safety population, 0/3 pts at DL1 and 2/7 pts at DL2 experienced Gr 3–4 neutropenia. The MTD was established at the full approved doses of both drugs (Cbz 25 mg/m2/AA 1000 mg). In 6 pts evaluable for PK (DL1 and DL2), median Cbz clearance (coefficient of variation %) was similar at cycle 1 (Cbz alone: 28.9 L/h/m2 [11%]) and cycle 2 (Cbz + AA coadministration: 28.6 L/h/m2 [42%]). In 9 evaluable pts, 55% PSA RR was observed. Conclusions: In this Ph 1 study, Cbz in combination with AA appeared to have a manageable safety profile. Gr 3–4 neutropenia was observed in 2 of 10 patients. Daily AA treatment did not affect Cbz clearance; Cbz exposure was comparable to previous studies of Cbz + P treatment. The Ph 2 portion is ongoing at the established MTD. Detailed safety, PK and preliminary efficacy data (Ph 1) will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT01511536.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.