Introduction In the United States of America, early childhood caries (ECC) is the most common chronic childhood disease of early onset, with dental caries being the most prevalent chronic disease among children aged 6-19 years. Children without an established medical home, from low-income households, and who are uninsured have historically shown to be prone to dental caries and attribute to higher health care costs. Early recognition of these risk factors by a pediatrician helps prevent the development of medical and psychosocial complications in the child. Methods The cross-sectional data of the prevalence of dental caries and dental treatment trends in children and three socioeconomic risk factors, namely establishment of a medical home, household income, and child’s health insurance, were accessed from the National Survey of Children's Health (NSCH) for the years 2016-2019. The association of the risk factors with the prevalence of dental caries and with the prevalence of dental treatment were analyzed using two-sample proportion tests and chi-square (χ 2 ) tests for dichotomous categorical variables and non-dichotomous categorical variables, respectively. Standardized residuals were calculated and analyzed as well. Furthermore, the odds ratios were calculated and utilized to quantify the influence of each category on the highly associated category with having teeth decay and not receiving dental treatment under each socioeconomic risk factor. Results The results of this study revealed that the three socioeconomic factors considered have statistically significant associations with tooth decay and dental treatment. The prevalence and associative risk of tooth decay and untreated caries were the highest in the children without a medical home. Additionally, the odds of having tooth decay was >50% higher for the children from the lowest household income category (0-99% federal poverty level [FPL]) compared to those from the high household income categories (200-399% FPL and >400% FPL). Public insurance coverage was associated with the highest prevalence of dental caries and not receiving fluoride treatment. Furthermore, the likelihood of not availing dental treatment is nearly two times or more higher for the uninsured children than children having public insurance, or private insurance, or a combination of both. Conclusion Our study findings reveal that children belonging to certain socioeconomic risk categories are at a higher risk of developing dental caries and not receiving dental treatment. As a consequence, the study implies that increased support and expansion of public health insurance will benefit oral health care for the children. Pediatricians play an integral part in developing a medical home for the child by providing preventative dental care and establishing continued care through dental referrals.

IntroductionDental caries is a global health issue. It is a largely preventable, multifactorial non-communicable disease. Given the gravity of the situation, in 2014 United States Preventive Services Task Force recommended that the primary care physician apply fluoride varnish from the eruption of the first tooth till the child attains five years of age. Using 2016-2019 National Survey of Children's Health (NSCH) cross-sectional representative data, the aim of this study was to determine if the child's age, gender, and race are predictors of the child having decayed teeth or cavities in the past 12 months and if they had availed preventative dental services from the dentist in the past 12 months in the US and if so, did they receive fluoride treatment. MethodsThe prevalence of dental caries and dental treatment among children under each category of sociodemographic risk factors were estimated using 2016-2019 NSCH's cross-sectional representative data on two survey questions. Then, the statistical significance of the association of the categorical risk factors with the prevalence of dental caries and the association of the categorical risk factors with the prevalence of fluoride dental treatment were tested using two-sample proportion tests and chi-square tests. Further, chisquare residual analysis was employed to better understand the nature of the association and to reveal the degree of contribution to the test statistic from each categorical combination of risk factors. ResultsPrevalence and associative risk of tooth decay in children was the highest in the 6-11 years age group across all three years under study. The 6-11 years age group had the highest prevalence and association of receiving fluoride treatment across all three years. In our study, the prevalence of dental caries in children by race varied according to the year. In 2016-2017 and 2018-2019, it was the Hispanic population with the highest prevalence of tooth decay. In 2017-2018 the highest prevalence was seen in the Non-Hispanic Black (NHB) population. Across all three years, the Hispanic population had the highest associative risk of tooth decay. The Non-Hispanic White (NHW) population had the highest prevalence and association with receiving fluoride treatment across all three years. Male children were found to have the higher prevalence and associative risk of decayed teeth across all three survey years. ConclusionDental caries is a worldwide health burden. However, it can be prevented by different precautionary measures. The results of our study revealed that certain sociodemographic factors such as age, gender, and race of the child make certain groups of the child population more at risk for the development of dental caries; most notable findings were that the male children were significantly associated to have decayed teeth and not availing dental fluoride treatment for which limited information is available in the literature. Additionally, the age groups 1-5 and 6-11 were significantly associated with the prevalence of not receiving denta...

Pandemic “wave” usually refers to the rise and fall of the infections with time, however, for a large country, the variations due to geographical location could be considerable. In this work, we investigated COVID-19 infection and fatality across the U.S. during the pandemic waves in the pre-vaccination period (January 2020–December 2020). Focusing on counties with a population ≥100,000, the data from the entire period were first segmented into two equal phases roughly corresponding to the first pandemic wave and subsequent surge, and each phase was further divided into two zones based on infection rate. We studied the potential influences of six sociodemographic variables (population density, age, poverty, education, and percentage of Hispanic and African American population) and four air pollutants (PM2.5, NO2, SO2, and O3) on the differences in infection and fatality observed among different phases and zones. We noticed a distinct difference in the overall impact of COVID-19 between the two phases of the pre-vaccination period with a substantial decrease in the fatality in the second phase despite an increase in the infection. Analysis using log-linear regression modeling further revealed a shift in the impact of several risk factors considered in this study. For example, population density and lesser education were found to be significant for infection during the first phase of the pandemic alone. Furthermore, population density and lesser education along with poverty and NO2 level had a significant contribution to fatality during the first phase of the pandemic, while age over 65 years was important in both phases. Interestingly, the effects of many of these factors were found to be significant only in the zones with higher infection rates. Our findings indicate that the impacts of several well-known sociodemographic and environmental risk factors for COVID-19 are not constant throughout the course of the pandemic, and therefore, careful considerations should be made about their role when developing preventative and mitigative measures.

Background Fatigue has been postulated to influence postural control, which may lead to an increased risk for falling among older adults.1 Mental and physical energy and fatigue have recently been reported to be four distinct mood states.2,3 Thus, to test Grobe’s1 theory of the influence of fatigue on postural control, we must examine all four mood states. Objective This study examined the influence of mental and physical energy and fatigue on postural control. Methods Adults (N=133, Males=50, Females=83, Age=25.8±7.96, BMI=24.8±3.8) aged 18-69 years were recruited from the community and asked to complete a series of surveys that measured their current mental and physical energy and fatigue states. After the completion of the surveys, subjects were instructed to complete the modified Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction in Balance (mCTSIB) using the APDM mobility monitors. Necessary assumptions were verified, and four multivariate multiple regression models were developed. Results Analyses yielded a significant association between posture and state mental energy (p=.048), but only when subjects were standing with their eyes closed while on a foam surface. Increased feelings of mental energy were associated with decreased total frequency dispersion (b=-358.62) and increased jerk in the coronal plane (b=11.78). No other associations were found. Discussion Results of our study suggest that as mental energy decreases there is a concomitant decrease in postural control when subjects are placed in conditions where they are unable to rely on visual feedback on unstable surfaces to maintain balance. Progressive increases in postural instability lead to increased risks of falls, most commonly in the elderly population. Falls are a significant risk factor for mortality. This study supports the clinical recommendation either to: (1) improve integration of vestibular and somatosensory input into postural control; or (2) train compensatory strategies for low lighting environments during episodes of decreased mental energy.

Background Routine immunization of both girls and boys starting from nine years of age with the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine is the current recommendation. The objective of this retrospective study using National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data was to evaluate the influence of sociodemographic factors on the series initiation and completion of the HPV vaccine from 2011 to 2020. Methodology The chi-square test was used to examine the statistical significance of the association between categorical variables and receipt of the HPV vaccine. The Cochran-Armitage test for trend was employed to assess the statistical significance of temporal trends in risk factors associated with rates of HPV vaccination. These trends were further quantified by a significant rate ratio by comparing them against the most recent survey years. Results HPV vaccine uptake was higher in the 9-14-year age group across survey years and had increased for both males and females over that time. The first dose of the HPV vaccine was most likely to be received by the 11-18-year age group. In the most recent survey of 2017-2020, the highest number of vaccination series completion was achieved for Gardasil®. Conclusions Improved physician efforts and strategies to vaccinate males, low socioeconomic strata patients, and ethnic minorities in more numbers are needed.