St-Laurent-Gagnon T, Bernard-Bonnin AC, Villeneuve E. Pain evaluation in preschool children and their parents. Acta Paediatr 1999; 88: 422-7. Stockholm. ISSN 0803-5253 The accurate assessment of pain in children constitutes a challenge for health professionals and, in the case of young children, parents are generally the main source of information. The objective of this study was to validate and to compare three pain scales in preschool children and their parents. A total of 104 children between 4 and 6 y of age and their parents participated in the study while undergoing an immunization procedure in the outpatient department of a tertiary pediatric care hospital. Three pain scales were used, the McGrath Facial Affective Scale (FAS), the Hester Poker Chip Tool (HPCT) and the Multiple Size Poker Chip Tool (MSPCT). There were 47 (45%) boys and 57 (55%) girls, with 54 (52%) 4-y-olds, 34 (33%) 5-y-olds and 16 (15%) 6-y-olds. Twentyeight children (27%) had memories of pain experienced during a former hospitalization. Correlations were very high both in children (r = 0.78) and their parents (r = 0.96) when comparing immunization pain scores obtained from the HPCT versus the MSPCT. Correlations between McGrath's FAS and HPCT or MSPCT ranged from r = 0.34-0.43 in children and r = 0.38-0.39 in parents. There was a good correlation between parents and children during the immunization procedure on all three scales, with the highest correlation using the FAS (r = 0.76), followed by the MSPCT (r = 0.69), and the HPCT (r = 0.66). Subgroup analyses based on the criteria of age, sex and previous hospitalization showed no consistent relationship. Parents tended to underestimate their child's pain when using HPCT or MSPCT. It seems that both HPCT and MSPCT measure a similar dimension of pain, whereas the FAS addresses a different aspect of pain. Although parents play an important role in their child's pain assessment, they tend to underestimate the intensity of pain when using HPCT or MSPCT. & Assessment, children, pain, parents
BACKGROUND The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends a multidimensional definition of palliative care for children as well as adults including relief of physical, psychological, so~i al , and spiritual suffering (1). In England, the distinction between palliative care and supportive care was recently debated (2). Supportive care was found to be a more general term, not related to a specific stage of a disease. Many elements of palliative care were also identified as part of supportive care, for example: relief of symptoms; and integration of psychological, social, and spiritual care. Palliative care seemed related to a more advanced stage of the illness and also to complicated symptoms, "complex end-of-life issues", and "unresolved symptoms and complex psychosocial issues for patients with advanced disease" (2). Nevertheless, there was significant overlap between the two definitions. Recent WHO recommendations call for the introduction of palliative care early in the course of a life-limiting illness (1). This recommendation is particularly challenging in children. In the United Kingdom, the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health (RCPCH) proposed four categories of pediatric illnesses that fulfill the definition of life-limiting disease and for which palliative care would be appropriate (3). These categories include diseases as diverse as cancer, muscular dystrophy or cystic fibrosis, cerebral palsy, and various syndromes such as San Filippo or Batten disease (3). In contrast to adults, the trajectories of these life-limiting diseases often evolve over many years. Their prognoses are less certain than for adults. The use of complex treatments such as organ transplantation, gene therapy, and mechanical ventilation increase the prognostic uncertainty, as Abstract I The objective of this study was to assess the concept of palliative care for a group of physicians in a tertiary care pediatric university hospital. Grounded theory methodology was used. Data included 12 semistructured interviews, field notes, research consent forms, research protocols, and articles published by the participants. Physicians involved in both research and clinical care of severely ill children were interviewed. Data analysis identified three principal themes. First, physicians limited their concept of palliative care to the relief of physical symptoms, equating palliative care with comfort care. Second, there was variation regarding the appropriate moment to introduce palliative care for children. Finally, many physicians were not comfortable using the term "palliative care". Although this study was conducted in one Canadian centre, the results raise questions that should be examined in other settings. A vague concept of palliative care may delay the provision of palliative care to children. .
The accurate assessment of pain in children constitutes a challenge for health professionals and, in the case of young children, parents are generally the main source of information. The objective of this study was to validate and to compare three pain scales in preschool children and their parents. A total of 104 children between 4 and 6 y of age and their parents participated in the study while undergoing an immunization procedure in the outpatient department of a tertiary pediatric care hospital. Three pain scales were used, the McGrath Facial Affective Scale (FAS), the Hester Poker Chip Tool (HPCT) and the Multiple Size Poker Chip Tool (MSPCT). There were 47 (45%) boys and 57 (55%) girls, with 54 (52%) 4-y-olds, 34 (33%) 5-y-olds and 16 (15%) 6-y-olds. Twenty-eight children (27%) had memories of pain experienced during a former hospitalization. Correlations were very high both in children (r = 0.78) and their parents (r = 0.96) when comparing immunization pain scores obtained from the HPCT versus the MSPCT. Correlations between McGrath's FAS and HPCT or MSPCT ranged from r = 0.34-0.43 in children and r = 0.38-0.39 in parents. There was a good correlation between parents and children during the immunization procedure on all three scales, with the highest correlation using the FAS (r = 0.76), followed by the MSPCT (r = 0.69), and the HPCT (r = 0.66). Subgroup analyses based on the criteria of age, sex and previous hospitalization showed no consistent relationship. Parents tended to underestimate their child's pain when using HPCT or MSPCT. It seems that both HPCT and MSPCT measure a similar dimension of pain, whereas the FAS addresses a different aspect of pain. Although parents play an important role in their child's pain assessment, they tend to underestimate the intensity of pain when using HPCT or MSPCT.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.