Although immunohistochemistry has proven to be valuable in the differentiation of epithelioid mesothelioma from pulmonary or metastatic adenocarcinoma, no single antibody has demonstrated absolute sensitivity or specificity in making this distinction. Using immunohistochemical analysis with D2-40, a recently available monoclonal antibody that has been used as a lymphatic endothelial marker, we examined 53 cases of mesothelioma, 28 cases of reactive pleura, 30 cases of pulmonary adenocarcinoma, 35 cases of renal cell carcinoma, 26 cases of ovarian serous carcinoma, 16 cases of invasive breast carcinoma, 11 cases of prostatic adenocarcinoma, and seven cases of urothelial carcinoma. In addition, immunohistochemistry using calretinin, cytokeratin 5/6, and WT1 was performed on all cases of mesothelioma, pulmonary adenocarcinoma, ovarian serous carcinoma, and renal cell carcinoma. Predominantly, membranous D2-40 immunoreactivity was present in 51 of 53 (96%) mesotheliomas, 27 of 28 (96%) cases of reactive pleura, and 17 of 26 (65%) ovarian serous carcinomas; membranous staining was not seen in any other tumors examined. Compared to other immunohistochemical markers of mesothelioma, D2-40 was as sensitive as calretinin and more sensitive than cytokeratin 5/6 and WT1. We conclude that D2-40 immunoreactivity is sensitive for cells of mesothelial origin, and may be useful in the differential diagnosis of epithelioid malignant mesothelioma vs adenocarcinoma.

The current FDA-approved standard of care for nonsmall cell lung cancer is Carboplastin/Taxol/Avastin based upon an impressive survival benefit; however, patients with squamous carcinoma (SQCC) cannot receive Avastin because of a 30% mortality rate due to fatal hemoptysis. In this study we evaluated the role of cytomorphology and immunohistochemistry in differentiating SQCC from adenocarcinoma (ADC) in lung FNA specimens. The case cohort included 53 FNA cases of nonsmall cell lung carcinoma with surgical pathology follow-up. All FNA specimens were reviewed independently by a panel of cytopathologists to differentiate between SQCC and ADC. The cell block material was available in 23 cases (11 ADC and 12 SQCC) to perform immunohistochemical stains for TTF-1, CK7, CK20, P63, and CK5/6. On surgical resection, 35/53 (66%) cases were diagnosed as ADC and 18/53 (34%) as SQCC. The number of cases classified correctly on the basis of cytomorphology was 66% for ADC and 53% for SQCC (combined accuracy 60%). By immunohistochemical staining, 14/23 (61%) cases expressed TTF-1. Nine cases were TTF-1 negative; eight of the TTF-1 negative cases (89%) were SQCC. Twenty-three cases expressed CK7 (87%); one ADC case (4%) showed focal CK20 positivity. Both P63 and CK5/6 expression was seen in 9/12 (75%) SQCC cases; none of the ADC cases showed this dual expression. Cytomorphology alone may not be able to stratify all cases of nonsmall cell lung carcinoma into ADC and SQCC in FNA specimens. The immune-panel of TTF-1, CK7, CK20, P63, and CK5/6 is useful in differentiating SQCC from ADC.

Lymphatic invasion and nodal metastasis are predictors of shorter disease-free and overall survival in carcinoma of the uterine cervix. The monoclonal antibody D2-40, which reacts with the oncofetal membrane antigen M2A, is a new selective marker for lymphatic endothelium, and has been shown to be useful in identifying the presence of lymphatic invasion in various malignant neoplasms, including cervical carcinoma. However, the reactivity of the tumor cells with D2-40 has not yet been evaluated. In this study, we examined the pattern of D2-40 immunoreactivity in a series of 138 invasive squamous cell carcinomas of the uterine cervix. We correlated the presence and extent of D2-40 immunoreactivity in the tumor cells with various clinicopathologic features, the presence of lymphatic invasion, lymph node metastasis and outcome. Diffuse or focal D2-40 immunoreactivity was present in 17 (12%) and 81 (59%) tumors, respectively, while 40 (29%) tumors showed no immunoreactivity. Lymphatic invasion and nodal metastasis were present in 56 and 29% of tumors, respectively. Tumor emboli within lymphatic spaces and metastatic tumor foci in lymph nodes showed no immunoreactivity in 86 and 80% of the cases, respectively. Lymphatic invasion and nodal metastasis were significantly more common in tumors showing low D2-40 immunoreactivity (Po0.0001 and 0.022, respectively). D2-40 immunoreactivity showed no correlation with any other clinicopathologic features examined, including tumor size, grade and FIGO stage. In univariate analysis low D2-40 immunoreactivity was significantly associated with shorter recurrence-free, but not with overall survival. Our studies suggest that D2-40 immunostaining may serve as a marker for increased risk of lymphatic invasion and tumor recurrence in cervical biopsy material. Further study of the biological function of the M2A antigen may shed some light on the interaction of tumor cells with lymphatics.

The Wilms' tumor gene WT1 plays complex roles in the development of the organs of the genitourinary tract and mesothelium, as well as Wilms' tumors. Although its biologic role is still unclear, most serous carcinomas of the ovary and peritoneum, mesotheliomas, and Wilms' tumor have been shown to express WT1. A recent study, however, found no WT1 expression in serous carcinomas of the endometrium, suggesting that WT1 could be useful in identifying the primary site of serous carcinomas. We examined the expression of WT1 and p53 by immunohistochemistry in 69 cases of endometrial carcinoma (35 endometrioid, 18 clear cell, 16 serous), 68 cases of ovarian carcinoma (28 serous, 11 endometrioid, 18 clear cell, and 11 mucinous), 14 fallopian tube carcinomas (12 serous, 2 endometrioid), and 20 primary peritoneal serous carcinomas. WT1 nuclear reactivity of any extent and intensity was considered positive. Immunohistochemical stains were evaluated semiquantitatively using a four-tiered scale. Among endometrial carcinomas, WT1 immunoreactivity was seen in 10 of 16 serous, but in none of 35 endometrioid or 18 clear cell carcinomas. Among ovarian tumors, WT1 expression was seen in 24 of 28 serous and 4 of 18 clear cell carcinomas, but in none of 11 endometrioid and 11 mucinous tumors. All 12 serous carcinomas but none of 2 endometrioid carcinomas of the fallopian tube were positive for WT1. WT1 expression was seen in 19 of 20 serous primary peritoneal carcinomas. The difference in WT1 expression was highly significant between serous and other types of tumors in all sites (p<0.0001, chi-square test), although the level of WT1 expression was significantly different among serous carcinomas arising at different sites (p<0.0001, Kruskal-Wallis test). A significant positive correlation was found between the level of p53 and WT1 expression in all carcinomas combined (r = 0.3935, p<0.0001, Spearman test), but when only serous carcinomas were analyzed, the correlation between p53 and WT1 expression levels did not reach statistical significance. Our results suggest that WT1 expression in epithelial tumors of the female genital tract may be related to cell differentiation and histologic subtypes of carcinomas, rather than to primary site of origin.

Retraction artifact resulting in clear spaces around tumor cell nests is frequently seen in histologic material and may present difficulty in their differentiation from lymphovascular invasion. We noticed that retraction artifact seemed to be more common around groups of breast cancer cells compared with benign acini, and when extensively present, metastasis to axillary lymph nodes was often seen. Thus, we performed a study of 304 cases of stage pT1 and pT2 breast carcinomas to test our hypothesis that extensive retraction artifact in tumors correlates with lymphatic spread and outcome. Tumors were evaluated to determine the presence and extent of retraction artifact around tumor cell nests and the presence of lymphatic invasion. Lymphatic invasion was confirmed by D2-40 immunostaining. The extent of retraction artifact in tumors was correlated with clinicopathologic tumor features and patient outcome. Variable degree of retraction artifact was present in 183 of 304 (60%) invasive carcinomas, with its extent ranging from 0% to 90% (median 5%). The extent of retraction artifact showed a significant correlation with tumor size, histologic type, histologic grade, presence of lymphovascular invasion, and nodal metastasis. Further, extensive retraction artifact was significantly associated with poor overall and disease-free survival in both univariate and multivariate analyses. We propose that the apparent retraction of the stroma from cells of invasive breast carcinoma on routine histologic sections is not a phenomenon merely due to inadequate fixation as currently believed. Rather, it likely signifies important biologic changes that alter tumor-stromal interactions and contribute to lymphatic spread and tumor progression.

Human papillomavirus (HPV) is recognized as a causal agent for cervical carcinomas. Assimilation of HPV oncogenes E6 and E7 into the host DNA promotes upregulation of cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor (CDKI) p16(INK4A), detectable by monoclonal antibody in the developing cervical cancer cells. The aim of this study was to 1) develop a protocol for p16(INK4A) immunocytochemical staining on SurePath preparations, and 2) determine its utility as an HPV marker on a spectrum of cervical reactive and neoplastic lesions. Seventy-two specimens consisting of 28 nonneoplastic/nondysplastic cases (NN), one reactive glandular cells (RGC), 27 low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL), 10 high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL), one squamous cell carcinoma (SCCA), four atypical glandular cells (AGUS), and two adenocarcinomas (ADCA) were reprepped by SurePath and antibody to p16(INK4A) applied at 1:100 dilution using the Dako Envision + System on the Dako Autostainer. Expression of p16(INK4A) within the nucleus principally and cytoplasm of at least 10-15 cells was considered positive. All initial Papanicolaou-stained discrepant cases (p16(INK4A) positivity of NN and RGC cases and lack of reactivity in LSIL, HSIL, and AGUS) were reviewed. Nine of ten (90%) HSIL, one (100%) SCCA, 21/27 (78%) LSIL, and some reactive and inflammatory specimens demonstrated the presence of p16(INK4A). Reevaluation of discrepant cases revealed that several were underinterpreted (four NN were LSIL, one RGC was AGUS) or overinterpreted (one LSIL was NN). Following reassessment, false-positive staining was present in only 1/25 (1.4%) NN. Six of 30 (20%) LSIL lacked p16(INK4A) positivity. One of 10 (10%) HSIL had no staining. Two of four AGUS did not react with p16(INK4A) antibody. Both SCCA (1) and ADCA (2) had positive expression. This study confirms the intimate relationship between p16(INK4A) and HPV cytopathic effect. The p16(INK4A) immunocytochemical stain can be applied to liquid-based cervical preparations. This technique offers a more objective approach to deciphering "gray areas" of gynecologic cytopathology.

No abstract

HBME-1, ERK, and p16 were more specific for malignancy, whereas CK19 and GAL-3 stained benign lesions with a higher frequency and were not specific for malignant FDLT. RET-oncoprotein showed poor sensitivity and specificity.