Primary non-Hodgkin lymphoma of the bone (PLB) is a rare type of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) that affects the skeletal system with or without regional lymph node involvement. We present the case of a 74-year-old female patient with pain due to multifocal osteolytic lesions. The diagnosis of diffuse large B-cells (non-GCB) phenotype was made by clinical, laboratory, histopathological examination accompanied by an extensive immunohistochemical profile of one of the skeletal lesions.

Aims The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of microsomal triglyceride transfer protein inhibitor (lomitapide) in patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia. Methods and results In 12 homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia patients treated with lipid-lowering drugs ± biweekly lipoprotein apheresis sessions (nine patients), daily lomitapide was added. The lipid profile (total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol) before and after lomitapide treatment was evaluated. The follow-up period with lomitapide treatment was 3–24 months (13.8 ± 7.9). The median baseline low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level was 900 mg/dl (348–1070), after lipid-lowering drugs therapy was 383.5 mg/dl (214–866) and after lipid-lowering drugs + time-averaged level was 288 mg/dl (183.7–716.6). The addition of lomitapide lowered low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels further by 56.8% compared to lipid-lowering drugs alone (mean reduction 262, 95% confidence interval (105.5–418.7), p = 0.005) and by 54% (mean reduction 182.9, 95% confidence interval (−342 – −23), p = 0.031) comparing to lipid-lowering drugs + lipoprotein apheresis (time-averaged level). The time-averaged level of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in lipid-lowering drugs + lipoprotein apheresis patients compared with lipid-lowering drugs + lomitapide was 54% in favour of lomitapide ( p = 0.031). Conclusions Treatment with lomitapide in homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia patients has a beneficial effect with a constant decrease of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol by 57% compared with classical lipid-lowering therapy and by 54% compared with classical lipid-lowering therapy and time-averaged level of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol.

: Over the past decade major breakthroughs in the understanding of lung cancer histology and mutational pathways have radically changed diagnosis and management. More specifically, in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tumour characterisation has shifted from differentiating based solely on histology, to characterisation that includes genetic profiling and mutational status of Epidermal Growth Factor (EGFR), Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK), c-ros oncogene 1 (ROS1) and BRAF. These genetic alterations can be targeted by specific drugs that result in improved progression-free survival, as well as higher response rates and are currently standard of care for NSCLC patients harbouring these mutations. In this a narrative, non-systematic review we aim to handpick through the extensive literature and critically present the ground-breaking studies that lead to the institution of tailored treatment options as standard of care for the main targetable genetic alterations.

Introduction The majority of patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH) phenotype are treated additionally to lipid lowering (LL) drugs (statin + ezetimibe ± colesevelam) with lipoprotein apheresis (LA) sessions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of microsomal triglyceride transfer protein inhibitor (lomitapide) in HoFH patients. Patients and methods In 12 HoFH patients treated with LL drugs ± biweekly LA sessions (9 patients) the 5–40 mg daily of lomitapide was added. Lipid profile [total cholesterol (TC), low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), triglycerides (TG) and high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C)] before (LL drugs ± LA) and after lomitapide treatment were evaluated. Results The follow-up period of lomitapide treatment for 12 patients was 3–24 months (13.8±7.9). The median baseline LDL-C levels was 1000 mg/dL (339–1150). During LL drug therapy, patients showed a median LDL-C level of 383.5 mg/dL (Range: 214–866 mg/dL) and with LL drugs + Time-averaged levels (CAVG) the median was 288.1 mg/dL (Range: 183.69–716.65 mg/dL). The addition of lomitapide at the average dosage of 21.4 mg/day lowered LDL-C levels by 56.8% comparing to LL drugs alone therapy [mean reduction 262.12, 95% CI (105.53, 418.71), p=0.005] and by 54% [mean reduction −182.89, 95% CI (−342.35, −23.43), p=0.031] comparing to LL drugs + LA (CAVG). The CAVG of LDL-C in LL drugs + LA patients compared with LL drugs + lomitapide was 54% in favour of lomitapide (p=0.031). After lomitapide administration to LL drugs + LA treatment, 78% patients discontinued LA and 2 patients reduced their LA frequency by 50%. During follow-up, 2 patients (16.6%) reported side effects (transient diarrhea, 1 patient had liver transaminase >5× ULN and had to decrease dose of lomitapide). Two patients stopped lomitapide due to diet and alcohol restrictions. Median and ranges of lipid and lipoprotein values before any intervention, after LL drugs, LL drugs plus LA, LL drugs plus LA (CAVG) and LL drugs plus lomitapide Total Cholesterol LDL-C HDL-C Triglycerides Before any intervention 1000 (339–1150) 900 (245–1070) 34.5 (25–50) 125 (87–314) After LL drugs 434 (278–915) 383.5 (214–866) 36 (27–51) 113 (62–198) LL drugs + LA (CAVG) 336.13 (248.57–784.16) 288.07 (183.69–716.65) 42.81 (25.84–46.68) 105.09 (55.79–166.68) LL drugs + Lomitapide 228.5 (118–554) 173.5 (74–515) 37.5 (29–50) 83.5 (23–316) LDL graph Conclusions Treatment with lomitapide in HoFH patients has beneficial effect with constant decrease of LDL-C by 57% compared with classical LL therapy and by 54% compared with classical LL therapy and CAVG and seems to be with good safety profile. Although, in some cases the hybrid (all availably drug treatment and LA) therapy may be needed.