No abstract

BackgroundBevacizumab and erlotinib have been demonstrated to prolong overall survival in patients with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We designed a four-arm Phase III trial to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of the combination of docetaxel, carboplatin, bevacizumab, and erlotinib in the first-line treatment of patients with NSCLC.MethodsA total of 229 patients with stage IIIb/IV non-squamous NSCLC were treated with two cycles of carboplatin (area under the concentration-time curve 5.5) and docetaxel 100 mg/m2 as chemotherapy. After completion of two treatment cycles, patients were evaluated for response and divided into four groups: 61/229 continued with four more cycles of chemotherapy (control group), 52/229 received chemotherapy plus erlotinib 150 mg daily, 56/229 received chemotherapy plus bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg, and 60/229 were treated with the combination of chemotherapy, erlotinib, and bevacizumab until disease progression. The primary endpoint was overall survival.ResultsOver 4 years of follow-up, there was no statistically significant difference in survival and time to progression between the four treatment groups. After two cycles of chemotherapy, responders and nonresponders were divided according to their response in order to examine the role of initial response as an independent factor in survival and response when a biological agent is combined with chemotherapy. Nonresponders, who received additional therapy with bevacizumab or combination therapy, had a survival benefit [657 days (95% confidence interval 349–970) and 681 days (95% confidence interval 315–912), respectively], which was statistically significant compared with continuation of cytotoxic chemotherapy (P < 0.001). The combination therapy had a safety profile comparable with that of bevacizumab and erlotinib taken individually.ConclusionAdministration of bevacizumab and erlotinib in combination with first-line chemotherapy, followed by bevacizumab and erlotinib monotherapy as maintenance, showed promising results in patients with NSCLC, with reduced toxicity as compared with chemotherapy alone, but did not translate into longer overall survival.

The cytologic results of lavage were positive for malignant cells in eight of 85 patients (9.4%). The existence of cancer cells in the pleural cavity can be the result of their exfoliation or surgical manipulations. The mechanical irrigation subdivides the percentage of positive samples. Our study supports that the positive findings on pleural lavage cytology is an essential prognostic factor.

No abstract

No abstract

ARDS remains a lethal complication after major lung resections. The reported mortality ranges from 50% to 100%, with increased incidence and mortality rates in pneumonectomy patients. The pathogenesis of early ARDS is still not fully understood, and the majority of patients will require mechanical ventilation. A review of the literature reveals that the role of noninvasive ventilation (NIV) in ARDS after lung resection is unclear, in contrast to its well established benefits in other types of respiratory failure. NIV is a technique of augmenting alveolar ventilation delivered by face mask, without introducing an endotracheal tube. NIV may reduce the need for endotracheal mechanical ventilation and improve clinical outcome in patients with acute respiratory failure after lung resection, avoiding complications related to intubation. We present a case of early ARDS following left-sided pneumonectomy, where bi-level positive airway pressure ventilation prompted a successful outcome.

Peutz–Jeghers syndrome (PJS) is characterized by mucocutaneous pigmentation and gastrointestinal hamartomatous polyposis, which can lead to intussusception. PJS patients face high lifetime risks for various cancer types, with the majority of patients being diagnosed with tumors along the gastrointestinal tract. Herein, we present the case of a 34‐year‐old man who carried a germline STK11 pathogenic variant, while lacking the cardinal features of PJS syndrome. Interestingly, he was diagnosed with lung adenocarcinoma despite being a never‐smoker. Tumor testing revealed clinically relevant molecular alterations, including the known germline pathogenic variant STK11, a KRAS somatic pathogenic variant, and FGFR3 gene amplification. Treatment with standard chemotherapy and immunotherapy did not have a clinical benefit. Due to clinical deterioration, the patient deceased 18 months after his initial diagnosis prior to having the chance for targeted therapy. Identification of rare hereditary cancer syndromes and the respective presence of tumor biomarkers can provide important alternatives to targeted treatments, including immunotherapy in patients with tumors unresponsive to conventional treatment protocols. This case highlights that although only a small proportion of lung cancer diagnoses will be due to hereditary predisposition, STK11 germline carriers should be under close surveillance for early detection of lung cancer.

No abstract