PPARs (peroxisome-proliferator-activated receptors) are ligand-activated transcriptional factor receptors belonging to the so-called nuclear receptor family. The three isoforms of PPAR (alpha, beta/delta and gamma) are involved in regulation of lipid or glucose metabolism. Beyond metabolic effects, PPARalpha and PPARgamma activation also induces anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects in different organs. These pleiotropic effects explain why PPARalpha or PPARgamma activation has been tested as a neuroprotective agent in cerebral ischaemia. Fibrates and other non-fibrate PPARalpha activators as well as thiazolidinediones and other non-thiazolidinedione PPARgamma agonists have been demonstrated to induce both preventive and acute neuroprotection. This neuroprotective effect involves both cerebral and vascular mechanisms. PPAR activation induces a decrease in neuronal death by prevention of oxidative or inflammatory mechanisms implicated in cerebral injury. PPARalpha activation induces also a vascular protection as demonstrated by prevention of post-ischaemic endothelial dysfunction. These vascular effects result from a decrease in oxidative stress and prevention of adhesion proteins, such as vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 or intercellular cell-adhesion molecule 1. Moreover, PPAR activation might be able to induce neurorepair and endothelium regeneration. Beyond neuroprotection in cerebral ischaemia, PPARs are also pertinent pharmacological targets to induce neuroprotection in chronic neurodegenerative diseases.
Background and purpose: Polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMNs) contribute to the vascular damage caused by transient cerebral ischaemia. Here we have evaluated the role of PMNs in intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) induced in a model of thrombolysis with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) during the acute phase of cerebral ischaemia. Experimental approach: The middle cerebral artery (MCA) of male spontaneously hypertensive rats was occluded for 1 h followed by reperfusion and, 5 h later, infusion of thrombolytic products (generated in vitro by t-PA on autologous clots). Effects of pretreatment (before the MCA occlusion) with vinblastine (4 days before; 0.5 mg·kg ) or saline on ICH, neutrophil infiltration, MCA vascular reactivity and brain infarct volume were assessed, 24 h after the beginning of reperfusion. Key results: Depletion of circulating neutrophils significantly reduced t-PA-induced ICH (vinblastine, 4.6 Ϯ 1.0; mAbRP3, 5.2 Ϯ 1.0 vs. saline, 10.8 Ϯ 2.7 haemorrhages; P < 0.05). This depletion was associated with a decrease in cerebral infiltration by neutrophils and a decrease of endothelium-dependent, vascular dysfunction in isolated MCA, induced by the ischaemia/ reperfusion and t-PA treatment. Brain infarct volume was significantly decreased after vinblastine treatment (159 Ϯ 13 mm 3 vs. 243 Ϯ 16 mm 3 with saline; P < 0.01) but not after depletion with mAbRP3 (221 Ϯ 22 mm 3 ).
Conclusions and implications:Our results showed that pharmacological depletion of PMNs prevented t-PA-induced ICH, in parallel with a decrease in cerebral infiltration by PMNs and a decreased endothelial dysfunction in cerebral blood vessels.
In stroke, there is an imperative need to develop disease-modifying drugs able to (1) induce neuroprotection and vasculoprotection, (2) modulate recovery and brain plasticity, and (3) limit the short-term motor and cognitive consequences. We hypothesized that fenofibrate, a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-α (PPAR-α) agonist, could exert a beneficial effect on immediate and short-term poststroke consequences related to its pleiotropic mechanisms. Rats or mice were subjected to focal ischemia to determine the effects of acute treatment by fenofibrate on (i) motor and memory impairment, (2) both cerebral and vascular compartments, (3) inflammation, (4) neurogenesis, and (5) amyloid cascade. We show that fenofibrate administration results in both neuronal and vascular protection and prevents the short-term motor and cognitive poststroke consequences by interaction with several mechanisms. Modulation of PPAR-α generates beneficial effects in the immediate poststroke consequences by mechanisms involving the interactions between polynuclear neutrophils and the vessel wall, and microglial activation. Fenofibrate modulates mechanisms involved in neurorepair and amyloid cascade. Our results suggest that PPAR-α agonists could check the key points of a potential disease-modifying effect in stroke.
BackgroundGranulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is a pharmacologic agent inducing neutrophil mobilization and a new candidate for neuroprotection and neuroregeneration in stroke. Its effects when used in combination with tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) were explored during the acute phase of ischemic stroke.MethodsWe used a middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) model of cerebral ischemia, associated with treatment with tPA, in male spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR). Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF; 60 μg/kg) was injected just before tPA. Neutrophil response in peripheral blood and in the infarct area was quantified in parallel to the infarct volume. Protease matrix metallopeptidase 9 (MMP-9) release from circulating neutrophils was analyzed by immunochemistry and zymography. Vascular reactivity and hemorrhagic volume in the infarct area was also assessed.ResultsTwenty four hours after ischemia and tPA, G-CSF administration induced a significant increase of neutrophils in peripheral blood (P <0.05). At 72 hours post-ischemia, G-CSF was significantly associated with an increased risk of hemorrhage in the infarct area (2.5 times more likely; P <0.05) and significant cerebral endothelium-dependent dysfunction. Ex vivo, an increased MMP-9 release from neutrophils after tPA administration correlated to the increased hemorrhagic risk (P <0.05). In parallel, G-CSF administration was associated with a decreased neutrophil infiltration in the infarct area (-50%; P <0.05), with a concomitant significant neuroprotective effect (infarct volume: -40%; P <0.05).ConclusionsWe demonstrate that G-CSF potentiates the risk of hemorrhage in experimental stroke when used in combination with tPA by inducing neutrophilia. This effect is concomitant to an increased MMP-9 release from peripheral neutrophils induced by the tPA treatment. These results highlight the potential hemorrhagic risk of associating G-CSF to thrombolysis during the acute phase of stroke.
While being increasingly recognized in clinical routine, brain microbleeds remain a puzzling finding for physicians. These small dot-like lesions are thought to be old perivascular collections of hemosiderin deposits. They can be found in different neurological settings such as cerebrovascular or neurodegenerative diseases. While their microscopic size would suggest considering these lesions as anecdotal, they are now regarded as biomarkers of severity of an underlying cerebrovascular disease. Their natural history and the interactions with surrounding brain cells remain unknown. However, their presence may impact therapeutic decisions. Deciphering the biological mechanisms leading to, or following microbleeds would enable us to address a key question: do microbleeds arise and impact the surrounding parenchyma like a miniature version of intracerebral hemorrhages or do they represent a different kind of injury? We hereby discuss, based on both clinical and experimental literature, the gap between the definition of microbleeds coming from neuroimaging and the pathophysiological hypotheses raised from histopathological and experimental data. Our analysis supports the need for a convergent effort from clinicians and basic scientists to go beyond the current “macro” view and disclose the cellular and molecular insights of these cerebral hemorrhagic microlesions.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.