Objective Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) occurs frequently in children and adolescents and may be a sign of insufficient asthma control. EIB is often evaluated by respiratory symptoms, spirometry, eNO measurement and methacholine testing (MCT) instead of time consuming exercise test. Aim of this study was to analyse the amount of patients for which an exercise challenge in a cold chamber (ECC) was needed for a clear EIB diagnosis, to characterize EIB phenotypes and the incidence of exercise induced laryngeal obstruction (EILO) in a large cohort of patients with EIB. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed in 595 children and adolescents (mean age 12.1 years) with suspected EIB from January 2014 to December 2018. Complete data sets of skin prick test, spirometry, eNO and MCT were available from 336 patients. Results An ECC to confirm the EIB diagnosis was performed in 125 (37.2%) of patients. Three EIB phenotypes were detected: group 1: EIB without allergic sensitization (n=159); group 2: EIB with other than house dust mite (HDM) sensitization (n=87) and group 3: EIB with HDM sensitization (n=90). MCT and eNO showed significant differences between the subgroups: An eNO>46 ppb and/or a MCT<0.1 mg was found in 23.9% vs. 50.6% vs. 57.8% in group 1–3, respectively. Significantly more patients suffered from EILO in group 1 compared to group 2 and 3 (n=13 vs. n=1). Conclusion EIB without sensitization is as often as EIB with sensitization. In patients without sensitization, EILO has to be considered as a possible cause of symptoms during exercise.