There are ongoing debates with respect to the prognostic roles of molecular biomarkers in sporadic medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC). In this study, we aimed at investigating the prognostic value of and mutations - the two most common mutations in sporadic MTCs. A search was conducted in four electronic databases. Relevant data were extracted and pooled into odds ratios (OR), mean differences (MD) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) using the random-effect model. We used Egger's regression test and visual of funnel plots to assess the publication bias. From 2581 studies, we included 23 studies with 964 MTCs for meta-analysis. Overall, the presence of mutation was associated with an elevated risk for lymph node metastasis (OR = 3.61; 95% CI = 2.33-5.60), distant metastasis (OR = 2.85; 95% CI = 1.64-4.94), advanced tumor stage (OR = 3.25; 95% CI = 2.02-5.25), tumor recurrence (OR = 3.01; 95% CI = 1.65-5.48) and patient mortality (OR = 2.43; 95% CI = 1.06-5.57). mutation had no significant prognostic value in predicting tumor aggressiveness. To summarize, our results affirmed that mutation is a reliable molecular biomarker to identify a group of highly aggressive sporadic MTCs. It can help clinicians better assess patient prognosis and select appropriate treatment decisions.
The clinical outcomes of isocitrate dehydrogenase‐wild‐type (IDH‐wt) lower‐grade glioma (LGG) have been the subject of debate for some time. In this meta‐analysis, we aimed to assess the prognostic values of several known genetic markers (e.g. TERT promoter mutation, H3F3A mutation, CDKN2A loss) in this tumor group. Four electronic databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Virtual Health Library, were searched for relevant articles. Pooled hazard ratio (HR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) for overall survival were calculated using a random‐effect model weighted by an inverse variance method. A total of 11 studies were finally selected from 2274 articles for meta‐analyses. Several genetic alterations were demonstrated to have a negative impact on prognosis of IDH‐wt LGGs, specifically TERT promoter mutation (HR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.42–2.70), H3F3A mutation (HR, 3.21; 95% CI, 1.86–5.55) and EGFR amplification (HR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.02–2.74). However, CDKN loss, ATRX mutation and coexisting gain of chromosome 7/loss of chromosome 10 showed no clinical significance in this glioma entity. Our study results demonstrated that IDH‐wt LGGs are heterogeneous in clinical outcome and not all tumors have a poor prognosis. The presence of TERT promoter mutation, H3F3A mutation and EGFR amplification showed negative prognostic impacts in this tumor entity. These genetic events can be used to better stratify patient outcomes.
Introduction
The aim of this study is to investigate and summarize the treatment efficacy and adverse effects (AEs) of sorafenib in the treatment of metastatic medullary thyroid carcinomas (MTCs).
Methods
We included studies reporting the treatment efficacy or drug toxicity of sorafenib as a single therapeutic agent in MTCs. Pooled incidence and its 95% confidence interval (CI) for complete response, partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), and sorafenib‐related AEs were calculated using random‐effect model.
Results
Eight trials with 101 metastatic MTCs were included for meta‐analyses. The overall PR and SD were 21% (95% CI = 9‐33) and 58% (95% CI = 41‐75), respectively. Hand‐foot syndrome, diarrhea, alopecia, mucositis, skin rash, fatigue, and hypertension were the most commonly observed AEs.
Conclusion
Our results show that sorafenib treatment has a modest effect and might be a candidate treatment in patients with metastatic MTCs who have failed other therapeutic regimens.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.