BACKGROUND: Transfusion of citrated blood products may worsen resuscitation-induced hypocalcemia and trauma outcomes, suggesting the need for protocolized early calcium replacement in major trauma. However, the dynamics of ionized calcium during hemostatic resuscitation of severe injury are not well studied. We determined the frequency of hypocalcemia and quantified the association between the first measured ionized calcium concentration [iCa] and calcium administration early during hemostatic resuscitation and in-hospital mortality. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of all admissions to our regional level 1 trauma center who (1) were ≥15 years old; (2) presented from scene of injury; (3) were admitted between October 2016 and September 2018; and (4) had a Massive Transfusion Protocol activation. They also (1) received blood products during transport or during the first 3 hours of in-hospital care (1st3h) of trauma center care and (2) had at least one [iCa] recorded in that time. Demographic, injury severity, admission shock and laboratory data, blood product use and timing, and in-hospital mortality were extracted from Trauma Registry and Transfusion Service databases and electronic medical records. Citrate load was calculated on a unit-by-unit basis and used to calculate an administered calcium/citrate molar ratio. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses for the binary outcome of in-hospital death were performed. RESULTS: A total of 11,474 trauma patients were admitted to the emergency department over the study period, of whom 346 (3%; average age: 44 ± 18 years; 75% men) met all study criteria. In total, 288 (83.2%) had hypocalcemia at first [iCa] determination; 296 (85.6%) had hypocalcemia in the last determination in the 1st3h; and 177 (51.2%) received at least 1 calcium replacement dose during that time. Crude risk factors for in-hospital death included age, injury severity score (ISS), new ISS (NISS), Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) head, admission systolic blood pressure (SBP), pH, and lactate; all P < .001. Higher in-hospital mortality was significantly associated with older age, higher NISS, AIS head, and admission lactate, and lower admission SBP and pH. There was no relationship between mortality and first [iCa] or calcium dose corrected for citrate load. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, though most patients had hypocalcemia during the 1st3h of trauma center care, neither first [iCa] nor administered calcium dose corrected for citrate load were significantly associated with in-patient mortality. Clinically, hypocalcemia during early hemostatic resuscitation after severe injury is important, but specific treatment protocols must await better understanding of calcium physiology in acute injury.

External ventricular drain (EVD) placement and management pose risks to neurocritically ill patients. Yet, little is known about EVD management or hospital EVD management practices and policies in US hospitals. A narrative review was conducted to describe EVD-related publications reported in PubMed and Embase between 1953 and 2019, and a survey was used to examine US hospital EVD practices and policies, including adherence to EVD guideline recommendations. Overall, 912 relevant articles were published between 1953 and 2019 (average 21; range, 0 to 102 articles, per year), primarily related to indications for EVD placement (n = 275, 30.2%), EVDassociated complications (n = 206, 22.6%), and EVD care (n = 200, 21.9%). The number of EVD publications increased over time (R 2 = 0.7), and most publications addressed EVD-associated infection (n = 296, 73.4%) and EVD insertion (n = 195, 45.2%). Survey responses were received from 30 hospitals (37.5% response rate), and reported use of antimicrobial-impregnated catheters in 80% of hospitals, preinsertion antibiotic administration in 70%, collection of cerebrospinal fluid samples for suspicion of ventriculitis in 73.3%, tracking of EVD-associated infection in 86.7%, routine EVD clamping during transport in 66.7%, and monitoring of intracranial pressure during transport in 33.3%. Adherence to hospital policies was high for recommendations related to flushing an EVD and changing cerebrospinal fluid drainage systems (100% [range, 0% to 100%] each), but low for intrahospital transportation (16.7% [0% to 83.3%]), EVD removal (0% [0% to 66.7%]), patient and family

Optimal postoperative analgesia has a significant impact on patient recovery and outcomes after cesarean delivery. Multimodal analgesia is the core principle for cesarean delivery and pain management. For a standard analgesic regimen, the use of long-acting neuraxial opioids (e.g., morphine) and adjunct drugs, such as scheduled acetaminophen and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, is recommended unless contraindicated. Oral or intravenous opioids should be reserved for breakthrough pain. In addition to the aforementioned use of multimodal analgesia, preoperative evaluation is critical to individualize the analgesic regimen according to the patient requirements. Risk factors for severe postoperative pain or analgesia-related adverse effects will require modifications to the standard analgesic regimen (e.g., the use of ketamine, gabapentinoids, or regional anesthetic techniques). Further investigation is required to determine analgesic drugs or dose alterations based on preoperative predictions for patients at risk of severe pain. Outcomes beyond pain and analgesic use, such as functional recovery, should be determined to evaluate analgesic treatment protocols.