Background: In the phase III IMpassion130 trial, combining atezolizumab with first-line nanoparticle albumin-boundpaclitaxel for advanced triple-negative breast cancer (aTNBC) showed a statistically significant progression-free survival (PFS) benefit in the intention-to-treat (ITT) and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)-positive populations, and a clinically meaningful overall survival (OS) effect in PD-L1-positive aTNBC. The phase III KEYNOTE-355 trial adding pembrolizumab to chemotherapy for aTNBC showed similar PFS effects. IMpassion131 evaluated first-line atezolizumabepaclitaxel in aTNBC. Patients and methods: Eligible patients [no prior systemic therapy or 12 months since (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy] were randomised 2:1 to atezolizumab 840 mg or placebo (days 1, 15), both with paclitaxel 90 mg/m 2 (days 1, 8, 15), every 28 days until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Stratification factors were tumour PD-L1 status, prior taxane, liver metastases and geographical region. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed PFS, tested hierarchically first in the PD-L1-positive [immune cell expression 1%, VENTANA PD-L1 (SP142) assay] population, and then in the ITT population. OS was a secondary endpoint. Results: Of 651 randomised patients, 45% had PD-L1-positive aTNBC. At the primary PFS analysis, adding atezolizumab to paclitaxel did not improve investigator-assessed PFS in the PD-L1-positive population [hazard ratio (HR) 0.82, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.60-1.12; P ¼ 0.20; median PFS 6.0 months with atezolizumabepaclitaxel versus 5.7 months with placeboepaclitaxel]. In the PD-L1-positive population, atezolizumabepaclitaxel was associated with more favourable unconfirmed best overall response rate (63% versus 55% with placeboepaclitaxel) and median duration of response (7.2 versus 5.5 months, respectively). Final OS results showed no difference between arms (HR 1.11, 95% CI 0.76-1.64; median 22.1 months with atezolizumabepaclitaxel versus 28.3 months with placeboe paclitaxel in the PD-L1-positive population). Results in the ITT population were consistent with the PD-L1-positive population. The safety profile was consistent with known effects of each study drug. Conclusion: Combining atezolizumab with paclitaxel did not improve PFS or OS versus paclitaxel alone. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03125902.

The non-canonical Hh inhibitor GANT61 decreased not only cell growth, but also the CSC population in TNBC cells. GANT61 enhanced the anti-cell growth activity of paclitaxel in these cells. These results suggest for the first time that GANT61 has potential as a therapeutic agent in the treatment of patients with TNBC.

Estradiol (E2) increases not only the cell growth but also the cancer stem cell (CSC) proportion in estrogen receptor (ER)‐positive breast cancer cells. It has been suggested that the non‐canonical hedgehog (Hh) pathway activated by E2 plays an important role in the regulation of CSC proportion in ER‐positive breast cancer cells. We studied anti‐CSC activity of a non‐canonical Hh inhibitor GANT61 in ER‐positive breast cancer cells. Effects of GANT61 on the cell growth, cell cycle progression, apoptosis and CSC proportion were investigated in four ER‐positive breast cancer cell lines. CSC proportion was measured using either the mammosphere assay or CD44/CD24 assay. Expression levels of pivotal molecules in the Hh pathway were measured. Combined effects of GANT61 with antiestrogens on the anti‐cell growth and anti‐CSC activities were investigated. E2 significantly increased the cell growth and CSC proportion in all ER‐positive cell lines. E2 increased the expression levels of glioma‐associated oncogene (GLI) 1 and/or GLI2. GANT61 decreased the cell growth in association with a G1‐S cell cycle retardation and increased apoptosis. GANT61 decreased the E2‐induced CSC proportion measured by the mammosphere assay in all cell lines. Antiestrogens also decreased the E2‐induced cell growth and CSC proportion. Combined treatments of GANT61 with antiestrogens additively enhanced anti‐cell growth and/or anti‐CSC activities in some ER‐positive cell lines. In conclusion, the non‐canonical Hh inhibitor GANT61 inhibited not only the cell growth but also the CSC proportion increased by E2 in ER‐positive breast cancer cells. GANT61 enhanced anti‐cell growth and/or anti‐CSC activities of antiestrogens in ER‐positive cell lines.

The results of the present study demonstrated that eribulin had potent antitumor effects on estrogen-stimulated ER-positive breast cancer cells and the combined treatment of eribulin with an antiestrogen resulted in a weakly additive antitumor effect. We herein suggested for the first time that eribulin exhibited anti-CSC effects on either ER-positive or ER-negative breast cancer cells.

Although paclitaxel plus bevacizumab (PB) therapy is an effective chemotherapeutic regimen for HER2-negative advanced breast cancer (ABC), predictive markers for its effectiveness remain undefined. We investigated the usefulness of systemic immunity markers associated with lymphocytes as predictive markers for PB therapy in patients with HER2-negative ABC. We retrospectively reviewed data from 114 patients with HER2-negative ABC who underwent PB therapy from November 2011 to December 2019. We calculated the absolute lymphocyte count (ALC), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) as representative systemic immunity markers. The time to treatment failure (TTF) and overall survival (OS) of the patients with high ALC, low NLR, and high LMR were significantly longer compared with those of the patients with low ALC, high NLR, and low LMR. A multivariable analysis revealed that high ALC, low NLR, and low PLR were independent predictors for TTF and high ALC, low NLR, and high LMR were independent predictors for OS. Systemic immunity markers were significantly associated with longer TTF and OS in patients who underwent PB therapy and may represent predictive markers for PB therapy in patients with HER2-negative ABC.