BackgroundAtherosclerosis and inflammation are more common in patients with diabetes than in patients without diabetes, and atherosclerosis progression contributes to inflammation. Therefore, anti-inflammatory therapy is important for the prognosis of patients with diabetes. Linagliptin is the only bile-excreted, anti-diabetic oral dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor. Although the anti-inflammatory effects of DPP-4 inhibitors in vivo and in vitro have been reported, few in vitro studies have examined the effects of linagliptin using monocytes, which play a central role in arteriosclerosis-related inflammation. Herein, we assessed the anti-inflammatory effects of linagliptin in human U937 monocytes.MethodsU937 cells at densities of 1 × 106 cells/mL were cultured in Roswell Park Memorial Institute medium supplied with 10% fetal bovine serum and treated with 100 nM phorbol myristate acetate for 48 h for differentiation into macrophages. The media were replaced, and the cells were pretreated with 1, 5, 10, 50, and 100 nM linagliptin for 1 h or were left untreated. The media were then replaced again, and the cells were treated with 1 μg/mL lipopolysaccharide (LPS) or 10 nM interleukin (IL)-1β only, in combination with 1, 5, 10, 50, and 100 nM linagliptin or were left untreated. The extracted media were used to measure IL-6 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α levels using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits.ResultsLPS alone significantly increased IL-6 and TNF-α production compared with the control treatment. The treatment of cells with linagliptin at all concentrations significantly inhibited the LPS-stimulated IL-6 and TNF-α production. Meanwhile, IL-1β alone significantly increased IL-6 production compared with the control treatment. No significant difference in IL-6 production was noted between the cells treated with IL-1β and simultaneous treatment with IL-1β and linagliptin.ConclusionsLinagliptin inhibited LPS-induced inflammation in human monocytic U937 cells.

BackgroundEffects of dopaminergic medication on executive function in patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD) are inconsistent.ObjectiveWe examined the effect of dopaminergic medication on executive function in 24 drug-naïve PD patients (de novo group) and in 21 PD patients on chronic dopaminergic medication (chronic medication group).MethodsPD patients without dementia were included in this study. For the de novo group patients, dopaminergic medication was initiated, and the dose was increased to improve motor symptoms. For the chronic medication group patients, dopaminergic medication was adjusted to relieve clinical problems. All participants were tested prior to and at 4–7 months after the drug initiation/adjustment. Executive function was assessed by using the Behavioral Assessment of the Dysexecutive Syndrome (BADS). Motor function was assessed by using the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS; part III). Improvement in executive function was compared with a simultaneous change in levodopa equivalent doses (LED) of dopaminergic medication and with improvement in motor functions.ResultsThe mean standardized BADS scores showed no significant improvement in both the groups. In the de novo group, percent improvement in the standardized BADS scores showed a significant positive correlation with the LED, but not with percent improvement in UPDRS part III. In the chronic medication group, percent improvement in the standardized BADS scores was negatively correlated with change in the LED, but not with percent improvement in UPDRS part III. Multiple regression analysis using improvement in the standardized BADS score as a dependent variable and patient’s background factors (ie, age, education, disease duration, and motor and executive assessments at baseline) as independent variable showed that improvement in the executive assessment is significantly correlated with the LED only in the de novo group.ConclusionEffects of dopaminergic drug adjustment on executive function differ according to the patient’s clinical stage and depend on LED in de novo stage.

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disease that leads to progressive cognitive decline. Several effective natural components have been identified for the treatment of AD. However, it is difficult to obtain conclusive evidence on the safety and effectiveness of natural components, because a variety of factors are associated with the progression of AD pathology. We hypothesized that a therapeutic effect could be achieved by combining multiple ingredients with different efficacies. The purpose of this study was thus to evaluate a combination treatment of curcumin (Cur) and ferulic acid (FA) for amyloid-β (Aβ)-induced neuronal cytotoxicity. The effect of Cur or FA on Aβ aggregation using thioflavin T assay was confirmed to be inhibited in a concentration-dependent manner by Cur single or Cur + FA combination treatment. The effects of Cur + FA on the cytotoxicity of human neuroblastoma (SH-SY5Y) cells induced by Aβ exposure were an increase in cell viability, a decrease in ROS and mitochondrial ROS, and repair of membrane damage. Combination treatment showed an overall higher protective effect than treatment with Cur or FA alone. These results suggest that the combined action mechanisms of Cur and FA may be effective in preventing and suppressing the progression of AD.

In Alzheimer’s disease (AD), accumulation of amyloid β−protein (Aβ) is one of the major mechanisms causing neuronal cell damage. Disruption of cell membranes by Aβ has been hypothesized to be the important event associated with neurotoxicity in AD. Curcumin has been shown to reduce Aβ−induced toxicity; however, due to its low bioavailability, clinical trials showed no remarkable effect on cognitive function. As a result, GT863, a derivative of curcumin with higher bioavailability, was synthesized. The purpose of this study is to clarify the mechanism of the protective action of GT863 against the neurotoxicity of highly toxic Aβ oligomers (Aβo), which include high−molecular−weight (HMW) Aβo, mainly composed of protofibrils in human neuroblastoma SH−SY5Y cells, focusing on the cell membrane. The effect of GT863 (1 μM) on Aβo−induced membrane damage was assessed by phospholipid peroxidation of the membrane, membrane fluidity, membrane phase state, membrane potential, membrane resistance, and changes in intracellular Ca2+ ([Ca2+]i). GT863 inhibited the Aβo−induced increase in plasma−membrane phospholipid peroxidation, decreased membrane fluidity and resistance, and decreased excessive [Ca2+]i influx, showing cytoprotective effects. The effects of GT863 on cell membranes may contribute in part to its neuroprotective effects against Aβo−induced toxicity. GT863 may be developed as a prophylactic agent for AD by targeting inhibition of membrane disruption caused by Aβo exposure.

There is correlated improvement in both gait and language function in de novo PD patients in response to dopaminergic drugs. Gait and language dysfunction in these patients may share a common pathophysiology linked to dopamine deficits.