Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and human metapneumovirus (HMPV) cause severe respiratory diseases in infants and elder adults 1 . Neither a vaccine nor an effective antiviral therapy exists to control RSV or HMPV infections. During viral genome replication and transcription, the tetrameric phosphoprotein P serves as a crucial adaptor between the nucleoprotein-RNA (N-RNA) template and the L protein, which has RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp), GDP polyribonucleotidyltransferase (PRNTase) and cap-specific methyltransferases (MTases) activities 2,3 . How P interacts with L and mediates association with the free form of N and with the ribonucleoprotein (RNP) is not clear for HMPV or other prominent human pathogens including Users may view, print, copy, and download text and data-mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use:
The respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) RNA dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) initiates two RNA synthesis processes from the viral promoter: genome replication from position 1U and mRNA transcription from position 3C. Here, we examined the mechanism by which a single promoter can direct initiation from two sites. We show that initiation at 1U and 3C occurred independently of each other, and that the same RdRp was capable of precisely selecting the two sites. The RdRp preferred to initiate at 3C, but initiation site selection could be modulated by the relative concentrations of ATP versus GTP. Analysis of template mutations indicated that the RdRp could bind ATP and CTP, or GTP, independently of template nucleotides. The data suggest a model in which innate affinity of the RdRp for particular NTPs, coupled with a repeating element within the promoter, allows precise initiation of replication at 1U or transcription at 3C.
Polyamines and hypusinated eIF5A have been implicated in the replication of diverse viruses; however, defining their roles in supporting virus replication is still under investigation. We have previously reported that Ebola virus (EBOV) requires polyamines and hypusinated eIF5A for replication. Using a replication-deficient minigenome construct, we show that gene expression, in the absence of genome replication, requires hypusinated eIF5A. Additional experiments demonstrated that the block in gene expression upon hypusine depletion was posttranscriptional, as minigenome reporter mRNA transcribed by the EBOV polymerase accumulated normally in the presence of drug treatment where protein did not. When this mRNA was isolated from cells with low levels of hypusinated eIF5A and transfected into cells with normal eIF5A function, minigenome reporter protein accumulation was normal, demonstrating that the mRNA produced was functional but required hypusinated eIF5A function for translation. Our results support a mechanism in which hypusinated eIF5A is required for the translation, but not synthesis, of EBOV transcripts. In contrast, depletion of polyamines with difluoromethylornithine (DFMO) resulted in a strong block in the accumulation of EBOV polymerase-produced mRNA, indicating a different mechanism of polyamine suppression of EBOV gene expression. Supplementing with exogenous polyamines after DFMO treatment restored mRNA accumulation and luciferase activity. These data indicate that cellular polyamines are required for two distinct aspects of the EBOV life cycle. The bifunctional requirement for polyamines underscores the importance of these cellular metabolites in EBOV replication and suggests that repurposing existing inhibitors of this pathway could be an effective approach for EBOV therapeutics. Ebola virus is a genetically simple virus that has a small number of proteins. Because of this, it requires host molecules and proteins to produce new infectious virus particles. Though attention is often focused on cellular proteins required for this process, it has recently been shown that cellular metabolites such as polyamines are also necessary for EBOV replication. Here we show that polyamines such as spermine and spermidine are required for the accumulation of EBOV mRNA and that eIF5A, a molecule modified by spermidine, is required for the translation, but not the production, of EBOV mRNAs. These findings suggest that effectively targeting this pathway could provide a biphasic block of EBOV replication.
Ebola virus (EBOV) causes a severe disease in humans with the potential for significant international public health consequences. Currently, treatments are limited to experimental vaccines and therapeutics. Therefore, research into prophylaxis and antiviral strategies to combat EBOV infections is of utmost importance. The requirement for high containment laboratories to study EBOV infection is a limiting factor for conducting EBOV research. To overcome this issue, minigenome systems have been used as valuable tools to study EBOV replication and transcription mechanisms and to screen for antiviral compounds at biosafety level 2. The most commonly used EBOV minigenome system relies on the ectopic expression of the T7 RNA polymerase (T7), which can be limiting for certain cell types. We have established an improved EBOV minigenome system that utilizes endogenous RNA polymerase II (pol II) as a driver for the synthesis of minigenome RNA. We show here that this system is as efficient as the T7-based minigenome system, but works in a wider range of cell types, including biologically relevant cell types such as bat cells. Importantly, we were also able to adapt this system to a reliable and cost-effective 96-well format antiviral screening assay with a Z-factor of 0.74, indicative of a robust assay. Using this format, we identified JG40, an inhibitor of Hsp70, as an inhibitor of EBOV replication, highlighting the potential for this system as a tool for antiviral drug screening. In summary, this updated EBOV minigenome system provides a convenient and effective means of advancing the field of EBOV research.
Most nonsegmented negative strand (NNS) RNA virus genomes have complementary 3′ and 5′ terminal nucleotides because the promoters at the 3′ ends of the genomes and antigenomes are almost identical to each other. However, according to published sequences, both ends of ebolavirus genomes show a high degree of variability, and the 3′ and 5′ terminal nucleotides are not complementary. If correct, this would distinguish the ebolaviruses from other NNS RNA viruses. Therefore, we investigated the terminal genomic and antigenomic nucleotides of three different ebolavirus species, Ebola (EBOV), Sudan, and Reston viruses. Whereas the 5′ ends of ebolavirus RNAs are highly conserved with the sequence ACAGG-5′, the 3′ termini are variable and are typically 3′-GCCUGU, ACCUGU, or CCUGU. A small fraction of analyzed RNAs had extended 3′ ends. The majority of 3′ terminal sequences are consistent with a mechanism of nucleotide addition by hairpin formation and back-priming. Using single-round replicating EBOV minigenomes, we investigated the effect of the 3′ terminal nucleotide on viral replication and found that the EBOV polymerase initiates replication opposite the 3′-CCUGU motif regardless of the identity of the 3′ terminal nucleotide(s) and of the position of this motif relative to the 3′ end. Deletion or mutation of the first residue of the 3′-CCUGU motif completely abolished replication initiation, suggesting a crucial role of this nucleotide in directing initiation. Together, our data show that ebolaviruses have evolved a unique replication strategy among NNS RNA viruses resulting in 3′ overhangs. This could be a mechanism to avoid antiviral recognition.Ebola virus replication | Ebola virus genome ends | variable 3′ genome ends | ebolavirus replication initiation | nonsegmented negative strand RNA virus replication
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.