This study showed decreased P-gp activity during aging. Consequently, the brain may be exposed to higher drug and toxin levels in elderly subjects.

There is wide variability in the response of individuals to standard doses of drug therapy. This is an important problem in clinical practice, where it can lead to therapeutic failures or adverse drug reactions. Polymorphisms in genes coding for metabolising enzymes and drug transporters can affect drug efficacy and toxicity. Pharmacogenetics aims to identify individuals predisposed to a high risk of toxicity and low response from standard doses of anti-cancer drugs. This review focuses on the clinical significance of polymorphisms in drug-metabolising enzymes (cytochrome P450 [CYP] 2C8, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP3A4, CYP3A5, dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase [UGT] 1A1, glutathione S-transferase, sulfotransferase [SULT] 1A1, N-acetyltransferase [NAT], thiopurine methyltransferase [TPMT]) and drug transporters (P-glycoprotein [multidrug resistance 1], multidrug resistance protein 2 [MRP2], breast cancer resistance protein [BCRP]) in influencing efficacy and toxicity of chemotherapy. The most important example to demonstrate the influence of pharmacogenetics on anti-cancer therapy is TPMT. A decreased activity of TPMT, caused by genetic polymorphisms in the TPMT gene, causes severe toxicity with mercaptopurine. Dosage reduction is necessary for patients with heterozygous or homozygous mutation in this gene. Other polymorphisms showing the influence of pharmacogenetics in the chemotherapeutic treatment of cancer are discussed, such as UGT1A1*28. This polymorphism is associated with an increase in toxicity with irinotecan. Also, polymorphisms in the DPYD gene show a relation with fluorouracil-related toxicity; however, in most cases no clear association has been found for polymorphisms in drug-metabolising enzymes and drug transporters, and pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics of anti-cancer drugs. The studies discussed evaluate different regimens and tumour types and show that polymorphisms can have different, sometimes even contradictory, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects in different tumours in response to different drugs. The clinical application of pharmacogenetics in cancer treatment will therefore require more detailed information of the different polymorphisms in drug-metabolising enzymes and drug transporters. Larger studies, in different ethnic populations, and extended with haplotype and linkage disequilibrium analysis, will be necessary for each anti-cancer drug separately.

Purpose: Despite the extensive clinical experience with docetaxel, unpredictable interindividual variability in efficacy and toxicity remain important limitations associated with the use of this anticancer drug. Large interindividual pharmacokinetic variability has been associated with variation in toxicity profiles. Genetic polymorphisms in drug-metabolizing enzymes and drug transporters could possibly explain the observed pharmacokinetic variability. The aim of this study was therefore to investigate the influence of polymorphisms in the CYP3A and ABCB1 genes on the population pharmacokinetics of docetaxel. Experimental Design: Whole blood samples were obtained from patients with solid tumors and treated with docetaxel to quantify the exposure to docetaxel. DNA was collected to determine polymorphisms in the CYP3A and ABCB1 genes with DNA sequencing. A population pharmacokinetic analysis of docetaxel was done using nonlinear mixed-effect modeling. Results: In total, 92 patients were assessable for pharmacokinetic analysis of docetaxel. A threecompartmental model adequately described the pharmacokinetics of docetaxel. Several polymorphisms in the CYP3A and ABCB1 genes were found, with allele frequencies of 0.54% to 48.4%. The homozygous C1236T polymorphism in the ABCB1 gene (ABCB1*8) was significantly correlated with a decreased docetaxel clearance (À25%; P = 0.0039). No other relationships between polymorphisms and pharmacokinetic variables reached statistical significance. Furthermore, no relationship between haplotypes of CYP3A and ABCB1and the pharmacokinetics could be identified. Conclusions: The polymorphism C1236T in the ABCB1 gene was significantly related to docetaxel clearance. Our current finding may provide a meaningful tool to explain interindividual differences in docetaxel treatment in daily practice.The anticancer drug docetaxel (Taxotere) is approved for the treatment of patients with early-stage, locally advanced and/or metastatic breast cancer, non -small-cell lung cancer, and androgen-independent metastatic prostate cancer. The recommended dose ranges from 75 to 100 mg/m 2 given as a 1-hour infusion once every 3 weeks. An important limitation associated with docetaxel use is the unpredictable interindividual variability in efficacy and toxicity. Potential causes for such variability in drug effects include the pathogenesis and severity of the disease being treated, the occurrence of unintended drug interactions, and impairment of hepatic and renal function (1). Despite the potential importance of these clinical variables in determining drug effects, it is recognized that inherited differences in metabolism and excretion can have an even greater effect on the efficacy and toxicity of drugs (1).The metabolism of docetaxel consists of a CYP3A-mediated oxidation of the tert-butylpropionate side chain, which results in the formation of four metabolites with reduced cytotoxic activity (2). The elimination pathway is mediated by the membrane-localized, energy-dependent drug efflux ABC tran...

No abstract

Trabectedin is metabolically converted to a large number of compounds that are excreted in both urine and faeces. In urine and faeces we have confirmed the presence of trabectedin, ET-745, ET-759A, ETM-259, ETM-217 and ETM-204. In addition we have identified a putative new metabolite designated ET-731. Future studies should be aimed at further identification of possible metabolites and assessment of their activity.

The relative apparent bioavailability of 26% was most likely caused by a significant effect of OC144-093 on the oral uptake of docetaxel. Large intrapatient and interpatient (pharmacokinetic) variation was found after oral as well as after i.v. administration of docetaxel. Higher plasma levels were observed after 100 mg i.v. docetaxel than after 100 mg oral docetaxel plus 500 mg oral OC144-093. The safety of the oral combination was good. More patients should be evaluated to determine the effect of P-gp single nucleotide polymorphisms on oral pharmacokinetic values of docetaxel.

The results will be used in future studies to explore the influence of the different SNPs on ABCG2 protein expression, activity, and substrate specificity. In addition, the results can be used to study the effects of genetic polymorphisms in the ABCG2 gene on the pharmacokinetic profile of anticancer drugs.

BACKGROUND: Ranitidine, a histamine 2 blocker, is the standard of care to prevent hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) caused by paclitaxel infusion. However, the added value of ranitidine in this premedication regimen is controversial. Therefore, we compared the incidence of HSRs during paclitaxel treatment between a standard regimen including ranitidine and a regimen without ranitidine. METHODS: This prospective, pre-post interventional, non-inferiority study compared the standard premedication regimen (N = 183) with dexamethasone, clemastine and ranitidine with a premedication regimen without ranitidine (N = 183). The primary outcome was the incidence of HSR grade ≥3. Non-inferiority was determined by checking whether the upper bound of the twosided 90% confidence interval (CI) for the difference in HSR rates excluded the +6% non-inferiority margin. RESULTS: In both the pre-intervention (with ranitidine) and post-intervention (without ranitidine) group 183 patients were included. The incidence of HSR grade ≥3 was 4.4% (N = 8) in the pre-intervention group and 1.6% (N = 3) in the post-intervention group: difference −2.7% (90% CI: −6.2 to 0.1). CONCLUSIONS: As the upper boundary of the 90% CI does not exceed the predefined non-inferiority margin of +6%, it can be concluded that a premedication regimen without ranitidine is non-inferior to a premedication regimen with ranitidine. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.trialregister.nl; NL8173.