The specific absorption rates (SAR) determined computationally in the specific anthropomorphic mannequin (SAM) and anatomically correct models of the human head when exposed to a mobile phone model are compared as part of a study organized by IEEE Standards Coordinating Committee 34, SubCommittee 2, and Working Group 2, and carried out by an international task force comprising 14 government, academic, and industrial research institutions. The detailed study protocol defined the computational head and mobile phone models. The participants used different finite-difference time-domain software and independently positioned the mobile phone and head models in accordance with the protocol. The results show that when the pinna SAR is calculated separately from the head SAR, SAM produced a higher SAR in the head than the anatomically correct head models. Also the larger (adult) head produced a statistically significant higher peak SAR for both the 1- and 10-g averages than did the smaller (child) head for all conditions of frequency and position.
This paper reviews recent standardization activities and scientific studies related to the assessment of human exposure to electromagnetic fields (EMF). The differences of human exposure standards and assessment of consumer products and medical applications are summarized. First, we reviewed human body modeling and tissue dielectric properties. Then, we explain the rationale of current exposure standards from the viewpoint of EMF and the standardization process for product compliance based on these exposure standards. The assessment of wireless power transfer, as an example of emerging wireless devices, and environmental EMFs in our daily lives are reviewed. Safety in magnetic resonance systems, where the EMF exposure is much larger than from typical consumer devices, is also reviewed. Finally, we summarize future research directions and research needs for EMF safety.
The relationship between skin temperature elevation and incident power density (IPD) from radio-frequency near-field exposure at 28 GHz for different angles of incidence is evaluated computationally in this study. The averaging scheme of the IPD is crucial for determining the maximum allowable exposure levels of wireless equipment to comply with certain standards/regulations. However, it is still unclear which component of the IPD (i.e., the norm or normal component to the human body) is more related the temperature elevation. In the case of four-element dipole arrays, the distances between the model and the antenna were 15 and 30 mm in transverse-electric-and transverse-magnetic-like polarized waves, respectively, and in the case of eight-element dipole arrays, the distances were 45 mm from the center of the array. From our computational results for four-and eight-element dipole arrays, we confirmed that the normal component of the IPD provides better correlation with the surface skin temperature, regardless of angle of incidence, particularly for smaller angles of incidence (<30 •). The enhancement of the ratio of the temperature increase to IPD was observed around the Brewster's angle, which is mainly attributable to the difference in transmittance at the body surface. This exposure scenario may not occur as the antennahuman distance was too large to consider compliance at the closest distance. In terms of output power, the most restrictive condition for compliance is shown to be normal incidence, suggesting the importance of compliance for such exposure scenarios. Furthermore, the absorbed power density proved to be an appropriate metric to monitor in relation to skin temperature elevation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.