OBJECTIVE: To assess outcomes of medication abortion provided through telemedicine compared with standard medication abortion at Planned Parenthood health centers in four U.S. states. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed electronic health records for patients receiving telemedicine compared with standard medication abortion at 26 health centers in Alaska, Idaho, Nevada, and Washington from April 2017 to March 2018. All patients had on-site ultrasound scans, laboratory testing, and counseling and provided informed consent before meeting with the clinician. Telemedicine patients met with a clinician by secure videoconference platform; standard patients met with a clinician in person. We also reviewed adverse event reports submitted during this period. Study outcomes included ongoing pregnancy, receipt of or referral for aspiration procedure, and clinically significant adverse events. To compare outcomes between the telemedicine and standard groups, we performed logistic regression accounting for gestational age and health center clustering. RESULTS: A total of 5,952 patients underwent medication abortion (738 telemedicine and 5,214 standard). Mean gestational age was 50.4 days for telemedicine patients compared with 48.9 days for standard patients (prevalence ratio 1.02; 95% CI 1.00–1.03). We had outcome data for 4,456 (74.9%) patients; follow-up within 45 days of abortion was lower among telemedicine patients (60.3%) than standard patients (76.9%) (prevalence ratio 0.83; 95% CI 0.78–0.88). Among patients with follow-up data, ongoing pregnancy was less common among telemedicine patients (2/445, 0.5%) than standard patients (71/4,011, 1.8%) (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.23; 95% CI 0.14–0.39). Aspiration procedures were less common among telemedicine patients (6/445, 1.4%) than standard patients (182/4,011, 4.5%) (adjusted OR 0.28; 95% CI 0.17–0.46). Fewer than 1% of patients in each group reported clinically significant adverse events. No deaths were reported. CONCLUSION: Findings from this study conducted across geographically diverse settings support existing evidence that outcomes for medication abortion provided through telemedicine are comparable with standard provision of medication abortion. Differences in observed outcomes may be due to differential follow-up between groups.

No abstract

No abstract

Men living in urban areas and states with lower prevalence of doctors have lower odds of screening for prostate cancer and PSAT, respectively, after adjusting for individual variables. Future studies should examine the reasons for these health disparities.

BackgroundWhile abortion care is widely legal in Australia, access to care is often poor. Many Australians must travel long distances or interstate to access abortion care, while others face stigma when seeking care. Telehealth-at-home medical abortion is a potential solution to these challenges. In this study, we compared the experience of accessing an abortion via telehealth-at-home to accessing care in-clinic.MethodsOver a 20-month period, we surveyed patients who received medical abortion services at Marie Stopes Australia via the telehealth-at-home service or in-clinic. We conducted bivariate analyses to assess differences in reported acceptability and accessibility by delivery model.ResultsIn total, 389 patients were included in the study: 216 who received medical abortion services in-clinic and 173 through the telehealth-at-home service. Telehealth-at-home and in-clinic patients reported similarly high levels of acceptability: satisfaction with the service (82% vs 82%), provider interaction (93% vs 84%), and recommending the service to a friend (73% vs 72%). Only 1% of telehealth-at-home patients reported that they would have preferred to be in the same room as the provider. While median time between discovering the pregnancy to first contact with a clinic was similar between groups, median time from first contact to taking the first abortion medication was 7 days longer for telehealth-at-home patients versus in-clinic patients (14 days (IQR 9–21) vs 7 days (IQR 4–14); p<0.01).ConclusionThe telehealth-at-home medical abortion service has the potential to address some of the challenges with provision of abortion care in Australia.

We found that half of eligible women received timely screening mammography. Diabetes and hypertension, though common, are not associated with timely screening mammography. Usual source of care remains an important factor to timely breast cancer screening.

Background: In the site-to-site telehealth for medication abortion model, patients visit a health center to meet with a remote clinician using telehealth technology. This model is safe, effective, and acceptable to patients and providers. The objective of this study was to document the experiences of patients and providers using telehealth for medication abortion in Planned Parenthood health centers across different geographical contexts in the United States.Methods: We conducted in-depth interviews with Planned Parenthood medication abortion patients who either met with a clinician at the clinic via telehealth or in-person about their experiences receiving care. We also interviewed Planned Parenthood staff members about their experiences implementing telehealth for medication abortion at their health center. Results:We interviewed 29 patients who received care at Planned Parenthood health centers in five states. Both telehealth and in-person patients described positive interactions with health center staff and clinicians. The vast majority of telehealth patients said that they felt comfortable speaking with the clinician over telehealth and had no trouble using the telehealth technology. We interviewed 12 providers, including clinicians and administrative staff, who worked in seven states. Providers largely thought that telehealth for medication abortion expanded access to medication abortion.Conclusions: Across different locations, our findings indicate that patients found telehealth for medication abortion services to be highly acceptable and providers found that telehealth services may help improve medication abortion access. As the use of telehealth for medication abortion expands, future research should include additional measures of quality to ensure that services are acceptable across different identities and experiences, including age, race, gender, and income level.

No abstract