Turnkey and thermal island supply scopes present turbine manufacturers with a perfect way to sell their rotating products. The popularity of these plant configurations, along with the recent availability of more holistic test codes, has led to the need for an accurate and reasonable method of determining the thermal performance of the externally-purchased HRSG component. To assess a multiple pressure HRSG, it is advantageous and convenient to have one single criterion for the evaluation of performance, especially when this criterion provides for the compensation of the different outlet energy streams. The so-called Model Steam Turbine method of HRSG evaluation was developed for these reasons. The result of the calculation, a lone performance criterion, is the shaft power of the fictitious Model Steam Turbine. In this paper we will detail the components of the Model Steam Turbine calculation and explore the merits of this method. Some thoughts on performance corrections are also presented.
Gas turbines in combined cycle (CC) power plants, in phased construction situations, usually operate for several months in the simple cycle (SC) mode while the steam portion of the plant is being constructed. At the time of commissioning the combined cycle phase, the gas turbines typically have accumulated a considerable number of operating hours and have possibly experienced some degradation, especially on turbines that have run on dual fuels. To determine the combined cycle new and clean performance, it is necessary to employ a phased testing approach. The phased testing approach involves testing the gas turbines when they are in new and clean condition and combining those results with the measured new and clean steam turbine cycle performance. The method of the phased testing has been introduced in ASME PTC 46 (1996) “Performance Test Code on Overall Plant Performance”. This paper will discuss in detail the test protocol, fundamental equations, corrections, and uncertainty analysis of phased testing. This paper will also discuss performance degradation and engine setting changes between the phases.
One of the most important aspects of American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Performance Test Code (PTC) thermal performance testing is the proper determination of test uncertainty since the Uncertainty Analysis (UA) validates the quality of a test as well as demonstrates that the test meets code requirements. It can also carry a commercial relevance when test tolerances are linked to uncertainty figures. This paper introduces an approach to the calculation of the random component of uncertainty when covariance exists between certain primary measurements in thermal performance testing. It demonstrates how to identify parameters that are co-variant, provides a methodology for properly calculating the aggregated random uncertainty of co-variant measurements, and discusses the effect of co-variance on UA results.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.