In order to more precisely define a syndrome of medial temporal lobe epilepsy, histories and physical findings were evaluated in 67 patients studied with intracranial electrodes who had medial temporal seizure onset and became seizure free following temporal lobectomy. Patients with circumscribed, potentially epileptogenic mass lesions were excluded. Fifty-four patients (81%) had histories of convulsions during early childhood or infancy, 52 of which were associated with fever. Complicated febrile seizures occurred in 33 (94%) of the 35 patients in whom detailed descriptions of the febrile seizures were available. Bacterial (5) or viral (2) central central nervous system infections were present in 7 patients with seizures and fevers. Other less common, but probably significant, risk factors included head trauma (10%) and birth trauma (3%). Only 5 patients had no apparent risk factors. The mean age at habitual seizure onset was 9 years. All patients had complex partial seizures, with half having only complex partial seizures. The other half also had secondarily generalized tonic-clonic seizures, but these were never the predominant seizure type. Only 3 patients had histories of convulsive status epilepticus and no patient had a history of nonconvulsive status epilepticus. All but 3 patients reported auras before some or all of their seizures, with an abdominal visceral sensation being by far the most common type of aura (61%). Of the 60 patients with identified risk factors, all but 2 had an interval between the presumed cerebral insult and the development of habitual seizures, with a mean seizure-free interval of 7.5 years.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
SUMMARYPurpose: Interictal positron emission tomography (PET) and ictal subtraction single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) of the brain have been shown to be valuable tests in the presurgical evaluation of epilepsy. To determine the relative utility of these methods in the localization of seizure foci, we compared interictal PET and ictal subtraction SPECT to subdural and depth electrode recordings in patients with medically intractable epilepsy. Methods: Between 2003 and 2009, clinical information on all patients at our institution undergoing intracranial electroencephalography (EEG) monitoring was charted in a prospectively recorded database. Patients who underwent preoperative interictal PET and ictal subtraction SPECT were selected from this database. Patient characteristics and the findings on preoperative interictal PET and ictal subtraction SPECT were analyzed. Sensitivity of detection of seizure foci for each modality, as compared to intracranial EEG monitoring, was calculated. Key Findings: Fifty-three patients underwent intracranial EEG monitoring with preoperative interictal PET and ictal subtraction SPECT scans. The average patient age was 32.7 years (median 32 years, range 1-60 years). Twenty-seven patients had findings of reduced metabolism on interictal PET scan, whereas all 53 patients studied demonstrated a region of relative hyperperfusion on ictal subtraction SPECT suggestive of an epileptogenic zone. Intracranial EEG monitoring identified a single seizure focus in 45 patients, with 39 eventually undergoing resective surgery. Of the 45 patients in whom a seizure focus was localized, PET scan identified the same region in 25 cases (56% sensitivity) and SPECT in 39 cases (87% sensitivity). Intracranial EEG was concordant with at least one study in 41 cases (91%) and both studies in 23 cases (51%). In 16 (80%) of 20 cases where PET did not correlate with intracranial EEG, the SPECT study was concordant. Conversely, PET and intracranial EEG were concordant in two (33%) of the six cases where the SPECT did not demonstrate the seizure focus outlined by intracranial EEG. Thirty-three patients had surgical resection and >2 years of follow-up, and 21 of these (64%) had Engel class 1 outcome. No significant effect of imaging concordance on seizure outcome was seen. Significance: Interictal PET and ictal subtraction SPECT studies can provide important information in the preoperative evaluation of medically intractable epilepsy. Of the two studies, ictal subtraction SPECT appears to be the more sensitive. When both studies are used together, however, they can provide complementary information.
Results of recent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies of memory are not entirely consistent with lesion studies. Furthermore, although imaging probes have identified neural systems associated with processing novel visual episodic information, auditory verbal memory using a novel/familiar paradigm has not yet been examined. To address this gap, fMRI was used to compare the haemodynamic response when listening to recently learned and novel words. Sixteen healthy adults (6 male, 10 female) learned a 10-item word list to 100% criterion, approximately 1 h before functional scanning. During echo-planar imaging, subjects passively listened to a string of words presented at 6-s intervals. Previously learned words were interspersed pseudo-randomly between novel words. Mean scans corresponding to each word type were analysed with a random-effects model using statistical parametric mapping (SPM96). Familiar (learned) words activated the right prefrontal cortex, posterior left parahippocampal gyrus, left medial parietal cortex and right superior temporal gyrus. Novel words activated the anterior left hippocampal region. The results for the familiar words were similar to those found in other functional imaging studies of recognition and retrieval and implicate the right dorsolateral prefrontal and left posterior medial temporal lobe (MTL) regions. The results for novel words require replication, but are consistent with the substantial lesion and PET literature implicating the anterior MTL as a critical site for processing novel episodic information, presumably to permit encoding. Together, these results provide evidence for an anterior-posterior functional differentiation within the MTL in processing novel and familiar verbal information. The differentiation of MTL functions that was obtained is consistent with a large body of PET activation studies but is unique among fMRI studies, which to date have differed from results with PET. Further, the finding of left MTL lateralization is consistent with lesion-based material-specific models of memory.
Summary:Purpose: The syndrome of temporal lobe epilepsy has been described in great detail. Here we focus specifically on the clinical manifestations of seizures originating in the hippocampus and surrounding mesial temporal structures.Methods: Seizure origin was confirmed in 67 cases by depth EEG recording and surgical cure after mesial temporal resection.Results: Among nonlateralized manifestations, we commonly found oral automatisms, pupillary dilatation, impaired consciousness, and generalized rigidity. Appendicular automatisms were often ipsilateral to the seizure focus, whereas dystonia and postictal hemiparesis were usually contralateral. Head deviation, when it occurred early in the seizure, was an ipsilateral finding, but was contralateral to the seizure focus when it occurred late. Clear ictal speech and quick recovery were found when seizures originated in the non-language-dominant hemisphere, but postictal aphasia and prolonged recovery time were characteristic of seizure origin in the language-dominant hemisphere.Conclusions: These signs help to define the mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (MTLE) syndrome and often provide information as to the side of seizure origin. Key Words: Medial temporal lobe epilepsy-Clinical seizure characteristics.Previous communications from this series examining medial temporal lobe epilepsy (MTLE) dealt with the patients' history and examinatioh, interictal and ictal scalp EEG recording, neuroimaging, and neuropsychological testing, including intracarotid amytal testing (1,2). We examine here the objective manifestations of seizures with proven medial temporal lobe origin, specficially those clinical characteristics that are available for review on videotaped events or detected during patient examination throughout the seizure.A wide variety of clinical signs have been described for temporal lobe seizures in general (3-6). A number of recent reports, however, have better defined these findings and have placed them in more orderly perspective. Although no clinical features are uniquely characteristic of the MTLE syndrome, some are highly suggestive and, taken together, provide additional diagnostic framework to help identify patients with MTLE. Furthermore, some of the clinical signs have consistent lateralizing value (7-9).
Summary:Purpose: Secondarily generalized seizures (SGSs) are often considered to be stereotyped, presumably sharing a common electrical pathway. We examined whether SGSs are uniform in a homogeneous group of patients with mesial temporal epilepsy, and whether certain clinical signs associated with generalization are lateralizing with regard to seizure origin.Methods: A comprehensive, standardized video/EEG analysis was performed of the clinical characteristics of 29 patients (69 SGSs) with mesial temporal seizure onset.Results: The sequence of tonic postures, as well as the sequence of tonic and clonic activity, was variable in SGSs of mesial temporal origin. The sequence of tonic activity, followed by vibratory and then clonic activity alone, was seen only in 51.7% of patients. Tonic and clonic activity could occur simultaneously. The most common clinical signs were forced head deviation (89.7%) and vocalization (75.9%). The most common tonic posture was bilateral arm extension (72.4%). All other clinical signs occurred in <60% of patients. Among these, early forced head deviation, asymmetric tonic facial contraction, tonic arm abduction with elbow flexion, and tonic arm extension combined with opposite arm flexion had lateralizing significance. The preceding partial seizure in SGSs (mean, 43.6 s) was significantly shorter than partial seizures without generalization (mean, 105.2 s; p < 0.001). SGSs occurred more often out of sleep (p < 0.01).Conclusion: Secondarily generalized seizures of mesial temporal origin are not uniform in their clinical presentation. The final phases of SGSs are more stereotyped than the initial clinical signs of generalization. This suggests variable electrical spread patterns, which may end in a common pathway. Some asymmetric motor signs have lateralizing significance. SGSs were associated with sleep and abbreviated partial seizures.
We measured the magnetoencephalogram (MEG), electroencephalogram (EEG), and electrocorticogram (ECoG) after stimulation of contralateral median nerve in four patients with partial epilepsy evaluated for surgery. Quantitative localization estimates from equivalent source modeling were compared with locations of central fissure in hand sensorimotor area determined by cortical stimulations, intraoperative photographs, and examination after excision in frontal lobe. We also measured MEG and EEG in nine control subjects. MEG and EEG localizations were within 2.5 cm of the estimated location of central fissure in all 13 subjects. In the three patients who had complete mapping of all three fields, the average distance of localizations from central fissure was approximately 4 mm in both MEG and EEG, 3 mm in ECoG, and 3 mm in combined MEG and EEG. MEG was simpler than EEG, which was simpler than ECoG. MEG resolved ambiguities in both EEG and ECoG. The combination of the three fields added information about the spatiotemporal activity of somatosensory cortex. Localization of central fissure was essential to surgical treatment.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.