No abstract

Our understanding of the intracrine (or local) regulation of estrogen and other steroid synthesis and degradation expanded in the last decades, also thanks to recent technological advances in chromatography mass-spectrometry. Estrogen responsive tissues and organs are not passive receivers of the pool of steroids present in the blood but they can actively modify the intra-tissue steroid concentrations. This allows fine-tuning the exposure of responsive tissues and organs to estrogens and other steroids in order to best respond to the physiological needs of each specific organ. Deviations in such intracrine control can lead to unbalanced steroid hormone exposure and disturbances. Through a systematic bibliographic search on the expression of the intracrine enzymes in various tissues, this review gives an up-to-date view of the intracrine estrogen metabolisms, and to a lesser extent that of progestogens and androgens, in the lower female genital tract, including the physiological control of endometrial functions, receptivity, menopausal status and related pathological conditions. An overview of the intracrine regulation in extra gynecological tissues such as the lungs, gastrointestinal tract, brain, colon and bone is given. Current therapeutic approaches aimed at interfering with these metabolisms and future perspectives are discussed.

No abstract

This study describes a validated LC-MS/MS method for assaying 23 steroids within a single run from 150 µl of human plasma, serum or prostatic tissue homogenate. Isotope-labeled steroids were used as internal standards. Samples were extracted with toluene, and ketosteroids were derivatized with hydroxylamine prior to LC-MS/MS analysis. The steroids were separated on a C18 column and methanol was used as an organic solvent with the addition of 0.2 mM ammonium fluoride to improve underivatized estradiol (E2) ionization. Certified reference serums as well as plasma samples, and homogenates of prostate tissue were utilized in the method validation. The specificity of the method was inspected with a total of 27 steroids. The validation proved that the method was suitable for the quantitative analysis of a wide panel of androgens (testosterone, T (3.3 pM-13 nM); androstenedione, A4 (3.3 pM-13 nM); 5α-androstanedione, DHA4 (13 pM-13 nM); dehydroepiandrosterone, DHEA (67 pM-133 nM); dihydrotestosterone, DHT (33 pM-33 nM); 11ketodihydrotestosterone, 11KDHT (13 pM-13nM); 11-ketotestosterone, 11KT (33 pM-6.7 nM); 11βhydroxyandrostenedione, 11bOHA4 (33 pM-13 nM); 11β-hydroxytestosterone, 11OHT (13 pM-33 nM)), as well as estrogens (estrone, E1 (3.3 pM-13 nM)), progestagens (17α-hydroxypregnenolone, 17OHP5 (32 pM-127 nM); 17α-hydroxyprogesterone, 17OHP4 (67 pM-133 nM); progesterone, P4 (3.3 pM-13 nM); pregnenolone, P5 (6.6 pM-13 nM)), and glucocorticoids (cortisol, F (33 pM-134 nM); cortisone E (66 pM-131 nM); corticosterone, B (33 pM-67 nM); 11-deoxycortisol, S (33 pM-66 nM); 21-hydroxyprogesterone, 21OHP4 (32 pM-13 nM)). Furthermore, E2 (335 pM-134 nM) and 11α-hydroxyandrostenedione, 11aOHA4 (33 pM-33 nM) could be analyzed if the concentration in the sample was high enough. In addition, aldosterone, A (128 pM-64 nM) and 11-ketoandrostenedione, 11KA4 (33 pM-13 nM) could be analyzed semiquantitatively. The limits of quantification for all compounds ranged from 0.9 to 91 pg/ml, and from 0.009 to 0.9 pg/mg tissue. Compared to our previous method, this new method also permits the analysis of the more challenging steroids, like DHT, DHEA and P5, and a panel of 11-ketosteroids.

No abstract