SummaryControl of the bioavailability of the growth factor TGF is essential for tissue formation and homeostasis, yet precisely how latent TGF is incorporated into the extracellular matrix is unknown. Here, we show that deposition of a large latent TGF complex (LLC), which contains latent TGF-binding protein 1 (LTBP-1), is directly dependent on the pericellular assembly of fibrillin microfibrils, which interact with fibronectin during higher-order fibrillogenesis. LTBP-1 formed pericellular arrays that colocalized with microfibrils, whereas fibrillin knockdown inhibited fibrillar LTBP-1 and/or LLC deposition. Blocking 51 integrin or supplementing cultures with heparin, which both inhibited microfibril assembly, disrupted LTBP-1 deposition and enhanced Smad2 phosphorylation. Full-length LTBP-1 bound only weakly to N-terminal pro-fibrillin-1, but this association was strongly enhanced by heparin. The microfibrilassociated glycoprotein MAGP-1 (MFAP-2) inhibited LTBP-1 binding to fibrillin-1 and stimulated Smad2 phosphorylation. By contrast, fibulin-4, which interacted strongly with full-length LTBP-1, did not induce Smad2 phosphorylation. Thus, LTBP-1 and/or LLC deposition is dependent on pericellular microfibril assembly and is governed by complex interactions between LTBP-1, heparan sulfate, fibrillin-1 and microfibril-associated molecules. In this way, microfibrils control TGF bioavailability.

ADAMTS10 and ADAMTS6 are homologous metalloproteinases with ill-defined roles. ADAMTS10 mutations cause Weill-Marchesani syndrome (WMS), implicating it in fibrillin microfibril biology since some fibrillin-1 mutations also cause WMS. However little is known about ADAMTS6 function. ADAMTS10 is resistant to furin cleavage, however we show that ADAMTS6 is effectively processed and active. Using siRNA, over-expression and mutagenesis, it was found ADAMTS6 inhibits and ADAMTS10 is required for focal adhesions, epithelial cell-cell junction formation, and microfibril deposition. Either knockdown of ADAMTS6, or disruption of its furin processing or catalytic sites restores focal adhesions, implicating its enzyme activity acts on targets in the focal adhesion complex. In ADAMTS10-depleted cultures, expression of syndecan-4 rescues focal adhesions and cell-cell junctions. Recombinant C-termini of ADAMTS10 and ADAMTS6, both of which induce focal adhesions, bind heparin and syndecan-4. However, cells overexpressing full-length ADAMTS6 lack heparan sulphate and focal adhesions, whilst depletion of ADAMTS6 induces a prominent glycocalyx. Thus ADAMTS10 and ADAMTS6 oppositely affect heparan sulphate-rich interfaces including focal adhesions. We previously showed that microfibril deposition requires fibronectin-induced focal adhesions, and cell-cell junctions in epithelial cultures. Here we reveal that ADAMTS6 causes a reduction in heparan sulphate-rich interfaces, and its expression is regulated by ADAMTS10.

The genome sequence of V. cholerae O1 Biovar Eltor strain N16961 has revealed a putative antibiotic resistance (var) regulon that is predicted to encode a transcriptional activator (VarR), which is divergently transcribed relative to the putative resistance genes for both a metallo-β-lactamase (VarG) and an antibiotic efflux-pump (VarABCDEF). We sought to test whether these genes could confer antibiotic resistance and are organised as a regulon under the control of VarR. VarG was overexpressed and purified and shown to have β-lactamase activity against penicillins, cephalosporins and carbapenems, having the highest activity against meropenem. The expression of VarABCDEF in the Escherichia coli (ΔacrAB) strain KAM3 conferred resistance to a range of drugs, but most significant resistance was to the macrolide spiramycin. A gel-shift analysis was used to determine if VarR bound to the promoter regions of the resistance genes. Consistent with the regulation of these resistance genes, VarR binds to three distinct intergenic regions, varRG, varGA and varBC located upstream and adjacent to varG, varA and varC, respectively. VarR can act as a repressor at the varRG promoter region; whilst this repression was relieved upon addition of β-lactams, these did not dissociate the VarR/varRG-DNA complex, indicating that the de-repression of varR by β-lactams is indirect. Considering that the genomic arrangement of VarR-VarG is strikingly similar to that of AmpR-AmpC system, it is possible that V. cholerae has evolved a system for resistance to the newer β-lactams that would prove more beneficial to the bacterium in light of current selective pressures.

A multiprotein complex containing TACC3, clathrin, and other proteins has been implicated in mitotic spindle stability. To disrupt this complex in an anti-cancer context, we need to understand the composition of the complex and the interactions between complex members and with microtubules. Induced relocalization of proteins in cells is a powerful way to analyze protein-protein interactions and additionally monitoring where and when these interactions occur. We used CRISPR/Cas9 gene-editing to add tandem FKBP-GFP tags to each complex member. The relocalization of endogenous tagged protein from the mitotic spindle to mitochondria and assessment of the effect on other proteins allowed us to establish that TACC3 and clathrin are core complex members and that chTOG and GTSE1 are ancillary to the complex, respectively binding to TACC3 and clathrin, but not each other. PIK3C2A, a membrane trafficking protein that binds clathrin, was previously proposed to also bind TACC3 and stabilize the TACC3–chTOG–clathrin–GTSE1 complex during mitosis. We show that PIK3C2A is not on the mitotic spindle and that knockout of this gene had no effect on the localization of the complex. We therefore conclude that PIK3C2A is not a member of the TACC3–chTOG–clathrin–GTSE1 complex. This work establishes that targeting the TACC3–clathrin interface or their microtubule-binding sites are the two strategies most likely to disrupt spindle stability mediated by this multiprotein complex.

A multiprotein complex containing TACC3, clathrin and other proteins has been implicated in mitotic spindle stability. To disrupt this complex in an anti-cancer context, we need to understand its composition and how it interacts with microtubules. Induced relocalization of proteins in cells is a powerful way to analyze protein–protein interactions and, additionally, monitor where and when these interactions occur. We used CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing to add tandem FKBP–GFP tags to each complex member. The relocalization of endogenous tagged protein from the mitotic spindle to mitochondria and assessment of the effect on other proteins allowed us to establish that TACC3 and clathrin are core complex members and that chTOG (also known as CKAP5) and GTSE1 are ancillary to the complex, binding respectively to TACC3 and clathrin, but not each other. We also show that PIK3C2A, a clathrin-binding protein that was proposed to stabilize the TACC3–chTOG–clathrin–GTSE1 complex during mitosis, is not a member of the complex. This work establishes that targeting the TACC3–clathrin interface or their microtubule-binding sites are the two strategies most likely to disrupt spindle stability mediated by this multiprotein complex.

We present a method to capture mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) by adhesion to extracellular matrix (ECM) molecules under flow conditions. The technique simulates a physiological system and exploits the natural biological interactions of cells, through integrin receptors, with their ECM. The system offers an insight into how MSCs could be targeted/localized to the site of interest (graft) following intravenous injection.

Tropomyosins are structurally conserved α-helical coiled-coil dimeric proteins that bind along the length of filamentous actin (F-actin) in fungi and animals. Tropomyosins play essential roles in the stability of actin filaments in non-muscle cells and are essential for calcium regulation of myosin II contractility in the muscle. Despite the crucial role of tropomyosin in actin cytoskeletal regulation, in vivo investigations of tropomyosin are limited, mainly due to the suboptimal live cell imaging tools currently available in many organisms. Here, we report mNeon-Green (mNG) tagged tropomyosin, with native promoter and linker length configuration, that clearly reports tropomyosin localization and dynamics in Schizosaccharomyces pombe (Cdc8), Schizosaccharomyces japonicus (Cdc8), and Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Tpm1 and Tpm2), in vivo and in isolated S. pombe cell division apparatuses. We extended this approach to also visualize the mammalian TPM2 isoform. Finally, we generated a camelid-nanobody against S. pombe Cdc8, which mimics the localization of mNG-Cdc8 in vivo without significantly influencing cell growth and dynamics of actin cytoskeleton. Using these tools, we report the presence of tropomyosin in previously unappreciated patch-like structures in fission and budding yeasts, show flow of tropomyosin (F-actin) cables to the cytokinetic actomyosin ring, and identify rearrangements of the actin cytoskeleton during mating. These powerful tools and strategies will aid better analyses of tropomyosin and actin cables in vivo.

Tropomyosins are structurally conserved α-helical coiled-coil proteins that bind along the length of filamentous actin (F-actin) in fungi and animals. Tropomyosins play essential roles in the stability of actin filaments and in regulating myosin II contractility. Despite the crucial role of tropomyosin in actin cytoskeletal regulation, in vivo investigations of tropomyosin are limited, mainly due to the suboptimal live-cell imaging tools currently available. Here, we report on an mNeonGreen (mNG)-tagged tropomyosin, with native promoter and linker length configuration, that clearly reports tropomyosin dynamics in Schizosaccharomyces pombe (Cdc8), Schizosaccharomyces japonicus (Cdc8) and Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Tpm1 and Tpm2). We also describe a fluorescent probe to visualize mammalian tropomyosin (TPM2 isoform). Finally, we generated a camelid nanobody against S. pombe Cdc8, which mimics the localization of mNG–Cdc8 in vivo. Using these tools, we report the presence of tropomyosin in previously unappreciated patch-like structures in fission and budding yeasts, show flow of tropomyosin (F-actin) cables to the cytokinetic actomyosin ring and identify rearrangements of the actin cytoskeleton during mating. These powerful tools and strategies will aid better analyses of tropomyosin and F-actin cables in vivo.