When associated with conditioned and limited (not adjuvant) radiotherapy, ABVD and MOPPEBVCAD were superior to Stanford V chemotherapy in terms of response rate and FFS and progression-free survival. Patients were irradiated less often after MOPPEBVCAD, but this regimen was more toxic. ABVD is still the best choice when it is combined with optional, limited irradiation.
PURPOSE The aim of this multicenter randomized study was to compare conventional therapy with conventional plus high-dose therapy (HDT) and autologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT) as front-line treatment for poor-prognosis non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). PATIENTS AND METHODS Between October 1991 and June 1995, 124 patients, aged 15 to 60 years, with diffuse intermediate- to high-grade NHL (Working Formulation criteria), stages II bulky (> or = 10 cm), III, or IV were enrolled. Sixty-one patients were randomized to receive etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone, and bleomycin (VACOP-B) for 12 weeks and cisplatin, cytarabine, and dexamethasone (DHAP) as a salvage regimen (arm A), and 63 to receive VACOP-B for 12 weeks plus HDT and ABMT (Arm B). RESULTS There was no significant difference in terms of complete remissions (CRS) in the two groups: 75% in arm A, and 73% in arm B. The median follow-up observation time was 42 months. The 6-year survival probability was 65% in both arms. There was no difference in disease-free survival (DFS) or progression-free survival (PFS) between the two groups. DFS was 60% and 80% (P = .1) and PFS was 48% and 60% (P = .4) for arms A and B, respectively. Procedure feasibility was the major problem. In arm B, 29% of enrolled patients did not undergo HDT and ABMT. A statistical improvement in terms of DFS (P = .008) and a favorable trend in terms of PFS (P = .08) for intermediate-/high- plus high-risk group patients assigned to HDT and ABMT was observed. CONCLUSION In this study, conventional chemotherapy followed by HDT and ABMT as front-line therapy seems no more successful than conventional treatment in terms of overall results. However, our results suggest that controlled studies of HDT plus ABMT should be proposed for higher risk patients.
Lymphoproliferative disease of granular lymphocytes (LDGL) is a recently recognized, relatively rare atypical lymphocytosis characterized by the presence of over 2000 lymphocytes with cytoplasmic azurophilic granules/mm3 in the peripheral blood. The clinical course is heterogeneous, varying from spontaneous regression to progressive, malignant disease. As a consequence, clinical intervention is not standardized. In a worldwide multicenter study, the authors observed 151 patients with LDGL for a mean follow-up time of 29 months. Forty-three patients were asymptomatic at the time of diagnosis. In the remaining cases, clinical symptoms included fever (41 cases), infections (58), neutropenia (47), anemia (17), and thrombocytopenia (12). In 69 cases, LDGL coexisted with an associated disease. Most patients had a nonprogressive clinical course despite the presence of severe symptoms. In 19 patients, death related to LDGL occurred within 48 months. The authors investigated which features at diagnosis were significantly associated with increased mortality. In the univariate analysis, lymph node and liver enlargement, fever at presentation, skin infiltration, a low (less than or equal to 5000/mm3) or high (greater than 20,000/mm3) peripheral leukocyte count, relatively low (less than or equal to 3000) or high (greater than 7000/mm3) absolute peripheral granular lymphocyte (GL) count, and a low (less than or equal to 15%) percentage of HNK-1-positive cells were found to be predictors of increased mortality. In the multivariate analysis, significant independent predictors were fever at diagnosis, a low (less than or equal to 15%) percentage of HNK-1-positive peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) and a relatively low (less than or equal to 3000) GL count. These results showed that about 25% of the patients with LDGL were diagnosed after a routine blood count and had no clinical symptoms. The remaining patients were symptomatic, with some experiencing a fatal clinical course. The author's analysis of the significant prognostic features of LDGL may help in understanding the heterogeneous nature of this syndrome.
A multiparameter analysis, which included the evaluation of clinical features, cell morphology, karyotype, phenotypic and functional immunologic findings, and T-cell receptor beta-chain configuration was performed on 34 patients with lymphoproliferative disease of granular lymphocytes (LDGL). The two-fold aim of the study was to identify the most useful tools that would more accurately characterize these patients and to deal with the problem of classifying these lymphoproliferative disorders. The data presented in this article suggest that a single parameter may not be sufficient to define the nature of the proliferating cells or to predict the clinical course of the disease and prognosis for the patient. The use of a multiparameter approach, however, may reach this goal, thus providing important prognostic and therapeutic information. Our study supports the concept that lymphoproliferative disease of granular lymphocytes is a heterogeneous disorder that ranges from indolent and possibly reactive conditions to the manifestation of aggressive malignancies.
When given in the context of relatively intensive initial chemotherapy, and at a dose >/= 5 million units (>/= 36 x 10(6) units per month), IFN-alpha2 prolongs survival and remission duration in patients with follicular lymphoma.
Single-center experiences have shown that intensified treatments with autologous transplantation are a promising therapeutic strategy for patients with high-risk follicle-center lymphoma (FCL) at diagnosis, whereas data from prospective multicenter trials are still lacking. This paper describes the results of a prospective multicenter study of an intensified purging-free high-dose sequential (i-HDS) chemotherapy schedule with peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) autografting. The main feature of this program is harvesting stem cells after intensified chemotherapeutic debulking, with no ex vivo manipulation of PBPCs. Ninety-two previously untreated patients aged 60 or younger with advanced-stage FCL were enrolled by 20 Italian centers and evaluated on an intention-to-treat basis. i-HDS proved feasible with limited toxicity (87% patients completed the planned treatment schedule). i-HDS led to a complete remission rate of 88%. The projected overall survival and disease-free survival (DFS) were, respectively, 84% and 67% at 4 years. Centralized molecular analysis showed that polymerase chain reaction-negative harvests could be collected in 47% of cases. Following autograft, 65% of molecularly evaluable patients achieved clinical and molecular remission. The projected DFS at 4 years of this subgroup is 85%. This result emphasizes the importance of achieving maximal tumor reduction in these patients. In conclusion, our data show that highly effective intensified treatments can now be routinely offered to young patients with poor-risk FCL even at small institutions, with no need for sophisticated and expensive cell manipulation procedures. IntroductionSeveral studies have investigated the role of intensified chemotherapy followed by autologous transplantation in the management of relapsed follicle-center lymphoma (FCL). [1][2][3][4][5][6][7] Results were encouraging with high rates of complete remission (CR) and molecular remission. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] The latest findings from the Dana Farber Cancer Institute show that molecular remission is associated with an extremely low relapse rate and a more than 80% projected freedom from relapse at 12 years. 7 Autologous transplantation may thus possess a curative potential in this otherwise incurable disease. 11,12 Similar approaches have been less frequently used at diagnosis. [13][14][15][16] In fact, a recent retrospective study from Stanford University showed that patients treated with autologous transplantation as first-line treatment have a better outcome compared to those treated with conventional chemotherapy. 16 Three important issues, however, still need to be addressed in evaluation of the real role of intensified approaches in FCL. First, there have been no multicenter prospective trials. A single-center trial carries the risk of overestimation of outcomes due to selection biases, and only highly qualified clinical teams may be able to achieve similar results with high-dose programs. Second, most autografting programs require ex vivo purging procedu...
In this prospective multicentric study, we investigated the contribution of positron emission tomography (PET) scanning to the staging of Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) by computed tomography (CT) and attempted to determine whether it has any impact on therapeutic approach. One hundred eighty six consecutive patients with HL from six Italian centers were enrolled in this study. They were staged with conventional methods; 2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-D: -glucose PET scanning were prospectively compared to CT. CT and FDG-PET stages were concordant in 156 patients (84%) and discordant in 30 patients (16%). PET stage in comparison to CT stage was higher in 27 patients (14%) and lower in 3 patients (1%). The programmed treatment strategy was modified in 11 out of 30 patients (37%) after the definition of final stage. If we considered the 123 CT staged patients with localized stage, ten patients (8%) with a change of stage from localized to advanced after PET evaluation were treated with different strategy. FDG-PET was shown to be a relevant, non-invasive method that supplements conventional procedures and should therefore be used routinely to stage HL, particularly in early stage patients, where a change in stage may modify disease management.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.