Introduction Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) has become a major global crisis. Preliminary reports have, in general, indicated worse outcomes in diabetes mellitus (DM) patients, but the magnitude of cardiovascular (CV) complications in this subgroup has not been elucidated. Methods We included 142 patients admitted with laboratory‐confirmed COVID‐19 from April 1st to May 30th 2020; 71 (50%) had DM. We compared baseline demographics and study outcomes between those with or without DM using descriptive statistics. Multivariate logistic regression was used to estimate the adjusted odds ratio for the study outcomes in DM patients, compared to those without DM, stratified by age, sex and glycaemic control. CV outcomes of interest include acute myocarditis, acute heart failure, acute myocardial infarction, new‐onset atrial fibrillation and composite cardiovascular end‐point consisting of all individual outcomes above. Result Mean age was 58 years. The unadjusted rates were higher in DM patients compared to non‐diabetics for the composite cardiovascular end‐point (73.2% vs. 40.6% p < .0001), acute myocarditis (36.6% vs. 15.5% p = .004), acute heart failure (25.3% vs. 5.6% p = .001), acute myocardial infarction (9.9% vs. 1.4% p = .03) and new‐onset atrial fibrillation (12.7% vs. 1.4% p = .009). After controlling for relevant confounding variables, diabetic patients had higher odds of composite cardiovascular end‐point, acute heart failure and new‐onset atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND There is a lack of data on the clinical outcomes in patients with native valve infective endocarditis (NVIE) and diabetes mellitus (DM). AIM To investigate (1) trends in the prevalence of DM among patients with NVIE; and (2) the impact of DM on NVIE outcomes. METHODS We identified 76385 with NVIE from the 2004 to 2014 National Inpatient Sample, of which 22284 (28%) had DM. We assessed trends in DM from 2004 to 2014 using the Cochrane Armitage test. We compared baseline comorbidities, microorganisms, and in-patients procedures between those with vs without DM. Propensity match analysis and multivariate logistic regression were used to investigate study outcomes in in-hospital mortality, stroke, acute heart failure, cardiogenic shock, septic shock, and atrioventricular block. RESULTS Crude rates of DM increased from in 22% in 2004 to 30% in 2014. There were significant differences in demographics, comorbidities and NVIE risk factors between the two groups. Staphylococcus aureus was the most common organism identified with higher rates in patients with DM (33.1% vs 35.6%; P < 0.0001). After propensity matching, in-hospital mortality (11.1% vs 11.9%; P < 0.0001), stroke (2.3% vs 3.0%; P < 0.0001), acute heart failure (4.6% vs 6.5%; P = 0.001), cardiogenic shock (1.5% vs 1.9%; P < 0.0001), septic shock (7.2% vs 9.6%; P < 0.0001), and atrioventricular block (1.5% vs 2.4%; P < 0.0001), were significantly higher in patients with DM. Independent predictors of mortality in NVIE patients with DM include hemodialysis, congestive heart failure, atrial fibrillation, staphylococcus aureus, and older age. CONCLUSION There is an increasing prevalence of DM in NVIE and it is associated with poorer outcomes. Further studies are crucial to identify the clinical, and sociodemographic contributors to this trend and develop strategies to mitigate its attendant risk.

No abstract

Background: To adapt during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, a large safety-net hospital in Atlanta, Georgia and other hospitals across the United Sates, increased telemedicine (TM) for outpatient visits. The impact on resident physicians, including minority providers, had not yet been reported. We aimed to assess how primary care residents perceived increased TM in clinics during the pandemic, and assess resident burnout. Materials and Methods: An online survey was sent to 60 internal medicine (IM) and 18 family medicine (FM) residents who used TM to treat underserved patients, from March to May 2020, at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. The questionnaire included questions on resident demographics, satisfaction with TM, screening capability for COVID-19, effectiveness for patient education on COVID-19, impact on patient interactions and time management. Burnout was assessed with the Abbreviated Maslach Burnout Inventory. Results: A majority (62 of 78) eligible residents (79.5%) responded to the survey. Ninety-one percent of residents agreed that TM was a secure alternative to face-to-face encounters. Seventy-nine percent used it to screen for signs/symptoms of COVID-19 and 93% provided patient education on COVID-19. Average visit length decreased by 10-20 min with TM. Post-TM, scores for overall burnout were decreased (p = 0.0003) and less residents in total exhibited burnout (p = 0.0156). Discussion and Conclusions: IM and FM residents viewed TM as an efficient way to screen for and provide education on COVID-19, as well as a secure alternative to face-to-face encounters. With increased used of TM during COVID-19, there was decreased burnout among primary care residents.

Introduction We surveyed a cohort of patients who recovered from severe SARS-CoV-2 infection to determine the COVID-19 vaccination rate. We also compared the willingness to accept the vaccine before and after its availability to assess changes in perception and attitude towards vaccination. Materials and Methods Recovered patients with severe hypoxemic respiratory failure from SARS-CoV-2 infection treated in the ICU at Grady Memorial Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia between April 1, 2020, and June 30, 2020 were followed up over a 1-year period to assess vaccine acceptability and acceptance rates, and changes in perception towards COVID-19 vaccination before and after vaccine availability. Results A total of 98 and 93 patients completed the initial and follow up surveys respectively. During the initial survey , 41% of the patients intended to receive vaccination, 46% responded they would not accept a vaccine against COVID-19 even if it were proven to be ‘safe and effective ‘and 13% undecided. During the follow up survey, 44% of the study cohort had received at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine. Major reasons provided by respondents for not accepting COVID-19 vaccine were lack of trust in the effectiveness of the vaccine, pharmaceutical companies, government, vaccine technology, fear of side effects and perceived immunity against COVID-19. Respondents were more likely to be vaccinated if recommended by their physicians (OR 6.4, 95% CI 2.8 – 8.3), employers (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.9 – 5.8), and family and friends (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.1 – 4.5) Conclusion We found a suboptimal COVID-19 vaccination rate in a cohort of patients who recovered from severe infection. COVID-19 vaccine information and recommendation by healthcare providers, employers and family and friends may improve vaccination uptake.

Tumor lysis syndrome is uncommon in solid tumors but with the use of immunotherapy (checkpoint inhibitors) their incidence is increasing. Physicians need to take adequate precautions while treating patients with immunotherapy. The findings of our case report will help improve our current understanding of tumor lysis syndrome specially in solid tumors and will help in developing multidisciplinary treatment and prophylaxis strategies for this uncommon, but potentially fatal complication.

No abstract

Background Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) disproportionately affects African Americans, and they tend to experience more severe course and adverse outcomes. Using a simple and validated instrument of depression screening, we evaluated the incidence and severity of major depression among African American patients within 90 days of recovery from severe COVID-19-associated respiratory failure. Methods African American patients hospitalized and treated with invasive mechanical ventilation for COVID-19-associated respiratory failure in the intensive care unit (ICU) of Grady Memorial Hospital, Atlanta, between April 1, 2020, and June 30, 2020, were screened for depression within 90 days of hospital discharge using the validated patient health questionnaires (PHQ-2) and PHQ-9. Results A total of 73 patients completed the questionnaire. The median age was 52.5 years [IQR 44–65] and 65% were males. The most common comorbidities were hypertension (66%) and diabetes mellitus (51%). Forty-four percent of the patients had a diagnosis of major depressive disorder (MDD) based on their PHQ-9 questionnaire responses. The incidence of MDD was higher among females (69%, n =18/26) compared to males (29%, n =14/47), in patients > 75 years (66%) and those with multiple comorbidities (45%). Eighteen percent of the patients had moderate depression, while 15% and 22% had moderately severe and severe depression, respectively. Only 26% ( n =7/27) of eligible patients were receiving treatment for depression at the time of this survey. Conclusion The incidence of depression in a cohort of African American patients without prior psychiatric conditions who recovered from severe COVID-19 infection was 44%. More than 70% of these patients were not receiving treatment for depression. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40615-021-01034-3.