High sensitivity (94%) and relatively high negative predictive value (85%) for Trömner sign indicate the usefulness of Trömner sign in ruling out CSM. High incidence of positive Trömner sign in presymptomatic cervical cord compression patients suggests Trömner sign could have a useful role in early detection of presymptomatic patients.

This study aimed to present the ‘dot-in-circle’ sign, which indicates the typical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasonographic (USG) findings for mycetoma involving soft tissue and bone. A total of 8 cases with histopathological proof of mycetoma affecting the musculoskeletal system, and that were examined via MRI and/or coexistent diagnostic ultrasonography between 2004 and 2013 in Songklanagarind Hospital were included in this study. The ‘dot-in-circle’ sign on the MRI and USG images of all the patients was reviewed by two radiologists. The analytic method was descriptive. All cases of musculoskeletal mycetoma revealed the ‘dot-in-circle’ sign on MRI, which was seen as multiple, small, round- to oval-shaped hyperintense lesions separated and surrounded by a low-signal intensity rim (circle), and a tiny, central, low-signal focus (dot). An USG study was available in four patients, and all USG findings demonstrated the ‘dot-in-circle’ sign as a central hyperechoic area (dot) surrounded by hypoechoic tissue (circle). In conclusion, the ‘dot-in-circle’ sign is a typical feature on MRI and USG findings for the diagnosis of musculoskeletal mycetoma.

IntroductionCalcific myonecrosis is a rare condition in which muscle in a limb compartment undergoes necrosis and becomes peripherally calcified with central liquefaction. The patient usually presents with a slowly progressive enlarged mass that sometimes can be misdiagnosed as soft tissue sarcoma. Most of the reported cases showed that the disease occurs often after trauma or compartment syndrome. However, the case of calcific myonecrosis following snake bite is rarely reported.Case presentationA 66-year-old Thai woman presented with a gradually progressive enlarged mass over a period of 10 years in her left leg. She had a history of untreated compartment syndrome after she was bitten by a snake (Malayan pit viper) in her left leg when she was 14-years old. At presentation, a plain X-ray showed a large soft tissue mass at the anterior compartment of her left leg. A sheet-like mass with an enlarged central cavity combined with peripheral calcification and cortical erosion of her tibia were observed. A biopsy was performed and the result was negative for neoplastic cells. During a 5-year follow-up, the mass progressively enlarged and then became infected and finally broke through the skin. She was treated by excision of the mass and administration of antibiotics. The wound completed healed at 1 month postsurgery. There was no wound complication or disease recurrence at 1 year postoperation.ConclusionsThe diagnosis of calcific myonecrosis was done by history taking and radiographic interpretation. In an asymptomatic patient the management should be observation and clinical follow-up. A biopsy should be avoided due to the high rate of postoperative infection. Treatment of choice in a symptomatic condition is mass excision.

Background: Lateral meniscal repair using an all–inside meniscal repair device involves a risk of iatrogenic peroneal nerve injury. To our knowledge, there have been no previous studies evaluating the risk of injury with the knee in the standard operational figure-of-4 position with joint dilatation in arthroscopic lateral meniscal repair. Purpose: To evaluate and compare the risk of peroneal nerve injury and establish the safe and danger zones in repairing the lateral meniscus through the anteromedial, anterolateral, or transpatellar portal in relation to the medial and lateral borders of the popliteal tendon (PT). Study Design: Descriptive laboratory study. Methods: Using axial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies of knees in the figure-of-4 position with joint fluid dilatation at the level of the lateral meniscus, we drew direct lines to simulate a straight all–inside meniscal repair device deployed from the anteromedial, anterolateral, and transpatellar portals to the medial and lateral borders of the PT. If the line passed through or touched the peroneal nerve, a risk of iatrogenic peroneal nerve injury was noted, and measurements were made to determine the safe and danger zones for peroneal nerve injury in relation to the medial or lateral border of the PT. Results: Axial MRI images of 29 adult patients were reviewed. Repairing the lateral meniscus through the anteromedial portal in relation to the lateral border of the PT and through the anterolateral portal in relation to the medial border of the PT had a 0% risk of peroneal nerve injury. The “safe zone” in relation to the medial border of the PT through the anterolateral portal was between the medial border of the PT and 9.62 ± 4.60 mm medially from the same border. Conclusion: It is safe to repair the body of the lateral meniscus through the anteromedial portal in the area lateral to the lateral border of the PT or through the anterolateral portal in the area medial to the medial border of the PT. Clinical Relevance: There is a risk of iatrogenic peroneal nerve injury during lateral meniscal repair. Thus, we recommend repairing the lateral meniscal tissue through the anteromedial portal in the area lateral to the lateral border of the PT and using the anterolateral portal in the area medial to the medial border of the PT, as neither of these approaches resulted in peroneal nerve injury. Additionally, the surgeon can decrease this risk by repairing the meniscal tissue using the all–inside meniscal device in the safe zone area.

Primary malignant non-Hodgkin's lymphoma of the muscle is rare. Currently, imaging tools are necessary to enable its diagnosis. Herein, we report the case of a patient who presented with swelling and pain in the right thigh and pelvis. Computed tomography findings revealed isodense masses in the patient's right thigh and left iliacus muscle, leading to the initial diagnosis of either primary muscular lymphoma or soft tissue sarcoma. Further investigation with magnetic resonance imaging was done, and a biopsy was performed. The ensuing histological diagnosis was that of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.