BackgroundFocused cardiac ultrasound (FOCUS) examination using a portable device is increasingly used for bedside diagnosis of cardiovascular diseases. This is a 4-week pilot project aiming to teach medical students to perform FOCUS to detect valvular heart lesions.MethodsPatients undergoing routine transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) were recruited by third year medical students who performed physical examination (PE) and FOCUS after 6-hour training to detect significant (moderate-to-severe) valvular lesions. Performance of FOCUS and PE was compared to TTE as reference using kappa statistics.Results10 medical students performed 212 PE and FOCUS on 107 patients with mean age 63.7 ± 14.9 years. TTE detected 126 significant valvular lesions of which FOCUS correctly identified 54 lesions (κ = 0.45) compared to 32 lesions by PE (κ = 0.28, p < 0.01). FOCUS was better than PE in identifying mitral stenosis (κ = 0.51 vs. 0.17), aortic stenosis (κ = 0.45 vs. 0.16) and tricuspid regurgitation (κ = 0.39 vs. 0.09, all p < 0.01). Students became more proficient in performing FOCUS examination with time.ConclusionsTeaching junior medical students to perform and interpret FOCUS was feasible after brief training and better than PE in detecting significant valvular lesions. Further studies are warranted to determine the utility of incorporating this new technology into mainstream medical training.
Chest wall tumor resection can result in a large defect that can pose a challenge in reconstruction in restoring chest wall contour, maintaining respiratory mechanics, and improving cosmesis. Titanium plates were first introduced for treating a traumatic flail chest, which yielded promising results in restoring chest wall stability. Subsequently, the applications of titanium plates in chest wall reconstruction surgery were demonstrated in case reports and series. Our center has adopted this technique for a decade, and patients are actively followed up after operation. Here, we retrospectively analyze our 10-year experience of using titanium plates and other reconstruction approaches for chest wall reconstruction, in terms of clinical outcomes, complications, and reasons for reoperation to determine long-term safety and efficacy. Thirty-eight patients who underwent chest wall resection and reconstruction surgery were identified. Of these, 11 had titanium plate insertion, 11 had patch repair or flap reconstruction, and the remaining 16 had primary closure of defects. Chest wall reconstruction using titanium plate(s) and patch repair (with or without flap reconstruction) was associated with larger chest wall defects and more sternal resections than primary closure. Subgroup analysis also showed that reconstruction by the titanium plate technique was associated with larger chest wall defects than patch repair or flap reconstruction [286.80 cm2 vs. 140.91 cm2 (p = 0.083)]. There was no 30-day hospital mortality. Post-operative arrhythmia was more commonly seen following chest wall reconstruction compared with primary closure (p = 0.041). Furthermore, more wound infections were detected following the use of titanium plate reconstruction compared with the patch repair (with or without flap reconstruction) approach (p = 0.027). In conclusion, the titanium plate system is a safe, effective, and robust approach for chest wall reconstruction surgery, especially in tackling larger defect sizes.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.