(Background) Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs) provide a low-cost, portable solution to obtain functional measures similar to those captured with three-dimensional gait analysis, including spatiotemporal gait characteristics. The primary aim of this study was to determine the feasibility of a remote patient monitoring (RPM) workflow using ankle-worn IMUs measuring impact load, limb impact load asymmetry and knee range of motion in combination with patient-reported outcome measures. (Methods) A pilot cohort of 14 patients undergoing primary knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis was prospectively enrolled. RPM in the community was performed weekly from 2 up to 6 weeks post-operatively using wearable IMUs. The following data were collected using IMUs: mobility (Bone Stimulus and cumulative impact load), impact load asymmetry and maximum knee flexion angle. In addition, scores from the Oxford Knee Score (OKS), EuroQol Five-dimension (EQ-5D) with EuroQol visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS) and 6 Minute Walk Test were collected. (Results) On average, the Bone Stimulus and cumulative impact load improved 52% (p = 0.002) and 371% (p = 0.035), compared to Post-Op Week 2. The impact load asymmetry value trended (p = 0.372) towards equal impact loading between the operative and non-operative limb. The mean maximum flexion angle achieved was 99.25° at Post-Operative Week 6, but this was not significantly different from pre-operative measurements (p = 0.1563). There were significant improvements in the mean EQ-5D (0.20; p = 0.047) and OKS (10.86; p < 0.001) scores both by 6 weeks after surgery, compared to pre-operative scores. (Conclusions) This pilot study demonstrates the feasibility of a reliable and low-maintenance workflow system to remotely monitor post-operative progress in knee arthroplasty patients. Preliminary data indicate IMU outputs relating to mobility, impact load asymmetry and range of motion can be obtained using commercially available IMU sensors. Further studies are required to directly correlate the IMU sensor outputs with patient outcomes to establish clinical significance.

A combination of wearable sensors’ data and Machine Learning (ML) techniques has been used in many studies to predict specific joint angles and moments. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of four different non-linear regression ML models to estimate lower-limb joints’ kinematics, kinetics, and muscle forces using Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs) and electromyographys’ (EMGs) data. Seventeen healthy volunteers (9F, 28 ± 5 years) were asked to walk over-ground for a minimum of 16 trials. For each trial, marker trajectories and three force-plates data were recorded to calculate pelvis, hip, knee, and ankle kinematics and kinetics, and muscle forces (the targets), as well as 7 IMUs and 16 EMGs. The features from sensors’ data were extracted using the Tsfresh python package and fed into 4 ML models; Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine, and Multivariate Adaptive Regression Spline for targets’ prediction. The RF and CNN models outperformed the other ML models by providing lower prediction errors in all intended targets with a lower computational cost. This study suggested that a combination of wearable sensors’ data with an RF or a CNN model is a promising tool to overcome the limitations of traditional optical motion capture for 3D gait analysis.

Trunk motion contributes to the technique of almost all sports motions. In this context, trunk motion refers to the motion of the segment incorporating the thorax and abdomen relative to the pelvis. 1 The trunk is essential in maintaining stability of the human body 1,2 and contains large muscle groups that are responsible for generating upper and lower limb motion. The anatomical trunk motions flexion/extension, lateral flexion, and axial rotation (trunk motion in the sagittal, frontal, and transverse plane, respectively) contribute to important performance

No abstract

No abstract

Gait analysis outside the laboratory has been possible by recent advancements in wearable sensors like inertial measurement units (IMUs) and Electromypgraphy (EMG) sensors. The aim of this study was to compare performance of four different non-linear regression machine learning (ML) models to estimate lower-limb joints’ kinematics, kinetics, and muscle forces using IMUs and EMGs’ data. Seventeen healthy volunteers (9F, 28 ± 5 yrs) were asked to walk over-ground for a minimum of 16 trials. For each trial, marker trajectories and three force-plates data were recorded to calculate pelvis, hip, knee, and ankle kinematics and kinetics, and muscle forces (the targets) as well as 7 IMUs and 16 EMGs. The most important features from sensors’ data were extracted using Tsfresh python package and fed into 4 ML models; Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Multivariate Adaptive Regression Spline (MARS) for targets’ prediction. The RF model outperformed the other ML models by providing lower prediction errors in all intended targets. This study suggested that a combination of wearable sensors’ data with an RF model is a promising tool to overcome limitations of traditional optical motion capture for 3D gait analysis.

No abstract